Jump to content

Heavy Duty Owners Without A Purpose


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ive wondered how do people who have a 2500, 3500 feel about people who have them and dont "use" them or dont have a need for them.

 

For example a lot of mechanics at my job live in the city and dont tow or haul anything ever, but they love their diesel trucks. Plus I always see business men who drive these around all the time, and i always wonder why they have them.

 

But how do u guys feel about these people? do u guy seem them as posers or dont mind them at all.

 

 

Just curious...

 

 

ive considered a 2500 diesel and just for the longevity of the vehicle itself.

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

yeah id have to agree the country is loaded with unnecessary diesels but i guess if they can afford the intial price (more expensive), the parts (more expensive), and the fuel ( more expensive) then more power to them. i look at it like this, id rather have a kick ass house and property than an overly expensive truck, its all about values, although it would be nice to have a dmax... :confused:

Posted

their is certain things that can appeal to the guy that just wants a truck for 4x4 or a diesel motor...one HDs in theory should last longer, two the diesel motor is a good option, don't forget lack of AFM in HDs lol...i'm going to an 3/4 HD next, do i tow alot? hell no i think they are sexy..

Posted

these questions remind me of grade school.....

 

i really dont care if someone has a 2500HD and doesnt tow. they wanted it and they bought it. does it make them a poser? only to other HD owners who have a superiority complex and feel threatened by others, like they shouldnt be able to have a HD because they're not "worthy".

 

the good thing about owning a 2500HD, whether they use it for it or not, is that IF they ever do need it to tow/haul something then they're ready to go.

 

hell, one reason i was looking at a 2500HD was solely for the purpose of getting a crew cab with a true 6' bed.... us 1500 owners dont have that option.

Posted
these questions remind me of grade school.....

 

i really dont care if someone has a 2500HD and doesnt tow. they wanted it and they bought it. does it make them a poser? only to other HD owners who have a superiority complex and feel threatened by others, like they shouldnt be able to have a HD because they're not "worthy".

 

the good thing about owning a 2500HD, whether they use it for it or not, is that IF they ever do need it to tow/haul something then they're ready to go.

 

hell, one reason i was looking at a 2500HD was solely for the purpose of getting a crew cab with a true 6' bed.... us 1500 owners dont have that option.

 

 

Well reason i asked was because i was talking to a buddy who owns a construction company and has several 2500's, 3500's - and i was talking to him about considering one just for dependability and resale value etc, but he kinda laughed and said it was stupid reason to own one... since he beats the shit out of his and replaces them every 5 years or so.

 

in his opinion those ppl are considered "posers", ive met several with the same mindset, and i happen to be slow at work so just wanted to tally the overall opinion of everyone on the forums.

 

so far everyone doesn't care, and i dont either.. id buy something just because i like, whether or not someone agrees with me.

Posted
these questions remind me of grade school.....

 

i really dont care if someone has a 2500HD and doesnt tow. they wanted it and they bought it. does it make them a poser? only to other HD owners who have a superiority complex and feel threatened by others, like they shouldnt be able to have a HD because they're not "worthy".

 

the good thing about owning a 2500HD, whether they use it for it or not, is that IF they ever do need it to tow/haul something then they're ready to go.

 

hell, one reason i was looking at a 2500HD was solely for the purpose of getting a crew cab with a true 6' bed.... us 1500 owners dont have that option.

 

 

Well reason i asked was because i was talking to a buddy who owns a construction company and has several 2500's, 3500's - and i was talking to him about considering one just for dependability and resale value etc, but he kinda laughed and said it was stupid reason to own one... since he beats the shit out of his and replaces them every 5 years or so.

 

in his opinion those ppl are considered "posers", ive met several with the same mindset, and i happen to be slow at work so just wanted to tally the overall opinion of everyone on the forums.

 

so far everyone doesn't care, and i dont either.. id buy something just because i like, whether or not someone agrees with me.

 

 

i don't like it when those random 3/4 or 1 ton owners put you down for driving a half ton calling it not a real truck..i get that alot from ford tards and those guys that say " a real truck dose't have spark plugs" the key reason i'm set on an HD next is the following

 

1) better durability

2) greater ability

3) less problems( atleast i think :confused: )

Posted

Free country. Everyone can buy what they wish and use it how they please. "Nuff said

Posted

I guess the same question could be said for those who own 1500's and really never use it as a truck.

Poeple will buy want they want and, hopefully, can afford.

 

For me, I have a 3500HD. Do I need it to tow my 27' travel trailer (7600lbs). Nope....but I will for the fifth wheel soon!

Posted

Hey Patrick,

 

The only reason you have the truck is to support Scouting events......that and you would have to sell the house and kids to buy that 5er that you want.

Posted

I think it's personal preference. If someone has the extra money to pay for a 2500, then go for it. It's nice to know that you have the power you need if you choose to use it. I know that I used to make fun of my brother for always buying 2500 HD until the day came that I needed to tow a tractor. Guess who I had to call? :confused::lol:

Posted

It dosen't bother me, its their money. I will say if I didn't need a 2500 to pull my fifth wheel I would not have one. The ride absolutely sucks.

Posted
I guess the same question could be said for those who own 1500's and really never use it as a truck.

Poeple will buy want they want and, hopefully, can afford.

 

Hey! I resemble that remark! :P:lol::lol:

 

I don't haul things that often with mine. I've put 30,000 miles on my truck, and I don't want to guess how many of those were loaded down. I need a truck from time to time, and it is still more cost effective than having a second vehicle for myself. :confused:

Posted
I guess the same question could be said for those who own 1500's and really never use it as a truck.

Poeple will buy want they want and, hopefully, can afford.

 

Hey! I resemble that remark! :lol::confused::P

 

 

 

Do you mean "resent"? :lol:

Posted

I couldn't live until I bought a brand-new Chevy 2500 LT-3 Crew Cab/Short Bed Duramax.Allison in 2006. The LBZ engine was wonderful and the Allison 1000 transmission was fabulous. And in four years, I put a whopping 5,800 miles on that gorgeous truck.

 

I'm an old fart and just getting in the truck was a job for me (youngsters can laugh now, but sooner or later you'll all be in my condition). Also, in reading all of the horror stories all over the internet about the diesel fuel situation, I worried about clogging that silly $100 fuel filter every time I fueled up. The ride was also abysmal.

 

Frankly, diesel was such a pain in the ass that I would not suggest it for anyone except folks who DO TOW, and tow a lot.

 

I'm back in a Chevy 1500 CC/SB Z-71 LTZ gas rig now and could not be happier.

 

To each his own, I guess, but I'll take the lower truck that is easy to handle.

 

My 2010 rig with the 5.3 liter engine and the 5-speed tranny actually gets better fuel mileage than my diesel ever got. That and the fuel is fully fifty-cents per gallon less. Hey, I'm happy.

 

My new gas rig is now precisely six-months old and I've already put 3,000 miles on her .... that is over half of what I put on the Duramax in FOUR YEARS.

 

Do I love my new Z-71 LTZ? You bet your butt I do. :confused::lol::P

 

Steve

Posted

My family has had trucks since '75 & have used them as trucks. My father's 2 trucks were 3/4 tons (one a reg' cab the other a crew cab).

 

My feelings about people who buy trucks regardless of wight range that don't need 1 is that they cause GM to spend money on creature comforts & cosmetic items rather than durability/engineering concerns.

 

When we saw the 1st GMT900 Sierra & Silverado in the plant, there was some personnel from Corporate accompanying the trucks. I asked about the "raincatcher" low point in the Sierra hood? The chap said that they were thinking of offering a hood scoop in the future (a la Toyota?) WTF!!!! these clowns can't even design a proper tailgate cable & they're thinking about some stupid scoop. Mind you the posers that glue those dual scoops on their vehicle's head would be drooling.

 

Finally, if you're on the engineering team for any truck program, you'd better be a truck owner. Yeah as if the gal that drives to work in an Aveo has any idea.

 

End of rant.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...