Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an exhaust leak on the driver's side. I thought it may be leaking at manifold, but dealer said the problem is usually the first joint. I checked to make sure the 3 bolt flange was tight. It may not be as bad now but still leaks. Exhaust wrap?? Would a small leak cause less low-end torque?

 

 

Hopefully I have fixed a couple things on my truck to make it perform slightly better. First was a double win! I was taking off my OEM intake to install my Airaid Jr. and I found it had muddy water in it. So with the new intake and absence of water, I should be better off.

 

I swapped my 3.42 gears for 3.73 which is a plus. But I swapped my stock tires for slightly larger BF Goodrich KM2's which are pretty heavy. I don't know if the gearing is enough to offset the tire difference or not.

 

Lastly I uninstalled my Hypertech and am going with the BBP tune!!! Can't wait after reading all the good things about it.

 

 

Johnny

Posted (edited)

If I was gonna get a 6.2L, how many miles should I not go over if to buy one?

When I bought my '07 5.3L it had 102 when I bought it, never did use any oil at all.

Edited by STINSAN3
Posted

I remember the spacers on the old throttle-body injected engines didn't do crap. Actually, they made them lose power. Don't know why people still bought them ...

 

I'd imagine the same is true for these new ones, although there's no fuel going through the spacer like the old ones, so maybe that changes things ...

 

I'm sure somebody on here has tried one and can post better info than I.

I've read posts on other forums referencing when installing TB spacers on certain Ecotec intakes they will not work correctly unless you grind down a hump or rise just inside the TB flange. I cannot speak to accuracy just passing along.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I bought a 2010 Denali Yukon with 6.2 and this morning I heard a tapping or knocking noise on cold start...didn't hear it till today and I just bought it used on saturday! Is this typical? Wife took it down the road and I could hear it as she passed and it has been running a few minutes by then. I put regular fuel; it is a flex fuel engine. 59,000 miles. Not sure if it stopped later or not.

 

My 2006 with L33 aluminum block taps/knocks as well but this was a little different. The 6.0 in my 05 2500 work truck makes no noise at all! What might it be? Thank you.

Posted

Not sure what fuel the L33 takes as this thread is for the L9H version. I assume premium and since you used regular could be spark knock. Run it empty and put the right gas in it and see what it does

 

 

Ryan

Posted

I have an exhaust leak on the driver's side. I thought it may be leaking at manifold, but dealer said the problem is usually the first joint. I checked to make sure the 3 bolt flange was tight. It may not be as bad now but still leaks. Exhaust wrap?? Would a small leak cause less low-end torque?.....

 

 

 

Johnny

 

 

I have an 11 1500 6.2 with 98k miles. My exhaust manifold on passenger side was cracked and they replaced it under warranty. The exhaust leak did not affect my low end power.

Also replaced broken engine mount under warranty as well. Happy owner!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

My 2011 runs pretty rough when I first crank it. Other than starting right away, you may even think it's not fuel injected the way it runs for a couple of seconds. Then it runs smooth with only a small yet aggravating exhaust leak. No codes. I'm guessing this isn't typical.

Posted

I need some advice. I just got my American Racing Headers and am looking forward to installing them in the near future. I just want some pointers on getting them to seal and stay sealed. I have only put headers on my old Jeep and the were always leaking. These ARH's are way better quality then anything else I have ever had but any help would be great. The aluminum heads worry me too. Do I put anti-sieze on the bolts? How tight do I torque the bolts? Any info would be great.

Posted

Buy new stock ac delco gaskets. Didn't use anything else. Did this with my camaro. Not sure what torque is for the trucks.

 

 

Ryan

Posted

Thanks for the quick reply. I have them in hand now. Wish me luck.

Posted

Post some after video. Headers would be awesome

 

 

Ryan

Posted (edited)

I still have factory exhaust on 2011 Silverado 1500 with the 6.2. Been looking into headers and read a thread on Performance Trucks of an owner removing LT headers because of mechanical noise made more audible after installing headers. Several other members chimed in and agreed they have the same noise but most were not concerned. I have a C5 Corvette with headers and the they definitely bring out more noise from the internals but the previously mentioned thread on Performance Trucks indicates that the noise on our trucks is louder than other engines / apllications. Can anyone here comment on this?

Edited by NemesisC5
Posted

I tell people if your worried about noise, leave your exhaust stock.

  • Like 1
Posted

I tell people if your worried about noise, leave your exhaust stock.

 

Not an answer to my question, I'm asking about mechanical noises on the L9H being louder than other engines.

 

If you can't help with contributing helpful information please refrain from "if God meant for men to fly he would have given us wings" type of answer.

Posted (edited)

Don't get your nylons in a knot - I misunderstood your question! GEESH ....

 

 

BUT .. headers are inherently going to make the vehicle louder, so ....

Edited by Jsdirt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...