Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just test drove a 2015 diesel for 35 miles, then took my broken in 2014 1/2 ton with 3.08 on the exact route. Got the same mileage according to the DIC.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I just test drove a 2015 diesel for 35 miles, then took my broken in 2014 1/2 ton with 3.08 on the exact route. Got the same mileage according to the DIC.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

Did you encounter the exact same obstacles? Such as stop signs/lights/etc, same speed and acceleration style?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

So Ive been trying to keep an eye on my MPG since I bought the truck. I started two tanks out with E85 and averaged between 10 and 12mpg. I switched to 87 after that and havent gotten anything better than 16mpg. This is all a mix of city and highway, mostly highway and country roads at 55. I do realize that my oversize tires and my lift will affect my MPG but should it be that much lower than what I am seeing from guys on here with 20 and higher? I just started using Fuelly and will keep posting updates to my tracking.

 

I would imagine that having the lift and large wheels/tires will prevent me from getting anything noticed by the dealer as far as a fault with the AFM or false claims of MPG ratings, so I dont plan on going that route but I do want to see if its normal or not compared to others.

 

Edit: Ive currently got 2112 miles on her and my current lifetime is 11mpg

Edited by liftedSLTsierra
Posted (edited)

230 miles into my new tune Fuel trims are settling in, all city driving with more than a few hard accelerations. photo_zps6bf585d8.jpg

Edited by mzodarg
Posted

Did you figure that average or are you going off the computer?

Im just going off my DIC and onstar tracking. But I will be tracking by actual average additionally from here on

Posted
230 miles into my new tune Fuel trims are settling in, all city driving with more than a few hard accelerations.

 

How much of an improvement have you seen?

Posted

Im just going off my DIC and onstar tracking. But I will be tracking by actual average additionally from here

I would say I am equal to what I was getting when the truck wouldn't get out of it's own way. I've only put 200+ miles on it but the MPG keeps increasing and I drive the crap out of it. If It does nothing better then what I'm getting now, I'll be happy.

 

Mike

Posted

I would say I am equal to what I was getting when the truck wouldn't get out of it's own way. I've only put 200+ miles on it but the MPG keeps increasing and I drive the crap out of it. If It does nothing better then what I'm getting now, I'll be happy.

 

Mike

 

These trucks have a very efficient tune in them already, they lean fuel way out at cruise (normal) have lean decal rates, shutting down half our cylinders, retarding cam timing, reducing transmission fluid pressure at low torque output to remove parasitic loss along with several other little tricks that eventually add up in the long run. I can see some room for improvement and many may see as much as .5mpg maybe even 1 mpg depending on driving conditions but once you get these things running like they should, most people actually see less MPG because that skinny pedal is so damn fun to mash now. It literally may take months before we start driving like adults again to see if we actually gained anything in mileage.

 

Steve

  • Like 1
Posted

So Ive been trying to keep an eye on my MPG since I bought the truck. I started two tanks out with E85 and averaged between 10 and 12mpg. I switched to 87 after that and havent gotten anything better than 16mpg. This is all a mix of city and highway, mostly highway and country roads at 55. I do realize that my oversize tires and my lift will affect my MPG but should it be that much lower than what I am seeing from guys on here with 20 and higher? I just started using Fuelly and will keep posting updates to my tracking.

 

I would imagine that having the lift and large wheels/tires will prevent me from getting anything noticed by the dealer as far as a fault with the AFM or false claims of MPG ratings, so I dont plan on going that route but I do want to see if its normal or not compared to others.

 

Edit: Ive currently got 2112 miles on her and my current lifetime is 11mpg

I am right with you on the mileage. Nothing wrong with the truck it is just the nature of the beast. Lift and Tires then the mileage goes down the drain. Gears helped around town but I am still getting 14-14.5 at 75 mph.

Posted

Just completed a 3 day road trip, San Diego to Lake Tahoe, Virginia City, over 2 High Sierra passes, sea level to 8000 + ft, 27 to 95 degree temps and a fierce headwind north on Hwy 395, very little V4 mode majority of the trip, no issues or problems, smooth, quiet and comfy, still an awesome truck.

n3rbb6.jpg

Posted

I've seen huge increases since it's above freezing. Getting 650kms (400 miles) out of a tank instead of 550kms (340 miles).

 

It seems so finicky

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

I should mention I took that diesel out for a drive again today. Drove it home in the country and back again, did a bit of running around in town. It was 15mpg, 1mpg better than mine according to DIC.

 

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...