Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

To be honest if the front was on par, based on fender measurements, the truck will be looking like a pre-runner and the rear end will look like it's squatting. I'd never want this for any reason, aesthetics or function - it wouldn't make sense. Therefore 1" of "rake" when measured by fenders should be considered level IMO. I'll try to get some measurements on angle of the box to help out as well.

Posted

2014 sierra double cab SLE allterrain 4x4 5.3

2" rough country level

 

All measurements from ground to lowest point at the center of the wheel well.

 

Before

Front 36"

Rear 39.5"

 

After

Front 38.25"

Rear 39.5"

 

I'm assuming the .25 extra was because of unsprung weight after coming down off the jacks.

 

I'm installing the 2.5" level soon enough I'll record the same info.

 

I'm thinking tire size is going to factor into this equation as well because there is definitely a difference in height between mine and yours and mine is a smaller lift size.

 

1.5" Pro-Comp lift - front spacers only

275/70R18 Toyo Open Country AT (33")

 

Before:

 

Front = 36.5"

Rear = 39.5"

 

After:

 

Front = 38.5"

Rear = 40"

 

This was measured after driving for a few days and after alignment to correct toe.

 

Looking at a side profile, I can definitely tell there is a rake from back to front and it is not level. This is why I am planning on adding a 1" spacer for the bottom strut mount that should put it much closer to the rear measurement.

Posted

Of course tire size will have an impact as well. I'm still on 265/65/18 I should of mentioned that. So 31.5" stock tire height as opposed to your 33"s. You would be .75" higher at each fender to begin with. Any pics on level ground? I'll grab a couple today

Posted

Of course tire size will have an impact as well. I'm still on 265/65/18 I should of mentioned that. So 31.5" stock tire height as opposed to your 33"s. You would be .75" higher at each fender to begin with. Any pics on level ground? I'll grab a couple today

 

My pics are a few pages back in this thread.

Posted

Been trying to read through the entire thread and notice many of you have 20s and say you can run 305/55/20s no problem with a 2" level.

I'm getting tires next week and am not sure what size to go. I've got the 18 inch rims and am thinking about trying 325/60/18 which is 33.4x12.8" will I fot those on stock rims with a 2.5 inch level? Or should I play it safe and get a 295/65?

 

The difference between a 305/55/20 and 325/60/18 is just about .8 inches wider.

 

Any suggestions would be great.

Posted (edited)

Has anyone tried to fit 295/70R18? on a 2.5 inch level. I have the TGC 2.5 inch level and want to run that but worried ill have too much rubbing. 295/70 is a 34.3x11.8

Edited by john2115
Posted

On the stock 18" wheel with a 2.5" level and a 12.5 wide tire, it rubs the sway bar slightly so no 325 is not going to fit well bboyce.

  • Like 1
Posted

On the stock 18" wheel with a 2.5" level and a 12.5 wide tire, it rubs the sway bar slightly so no 325 is not going to fit well bboyce.

Alright good to know. Wonder what a small wheel spacer would do. Wonder how large in diameter we can go. A guy over on another forum claims hes running 35s with just a 3 inch level.

Posted (edited)

2WD

Looks good I wouldn't be able to tell the difference from the exterior. Maybe this had weight and height impact stock for stock vs a 4wd too.

Edited by tanner709
Posted

That's a good looking truck. Definitely going to get that extra 1" spacer for mine to get it level like yours. Love the wheels also.

 

Sent via Samsung Note II

 

 

Posted

I added .5" up front so now it sits 39.5 with 2.5 up front and 40 in the back stock.

attachicon.gifimage.jpgattachicon.gifimage.jpgattachicon.gifimage.jpg

Looks great with the level, rims and toyo ATs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,942
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    tblt44
    Newest Member
    tblt44
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 709 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • There was talk over the last couple of years that the contract to build these trucks between GM and International would not be renewed.  International moved production of all their other trucks besides the companion CV model out of the Springfield plant some time ago when they opened their San Antonio plant.  That left Springfield only building the Silverado Medium Duty, International CV Series, and some Express/Savanna long wheelbase cutaways.  International also put the plant up for sale some time ago.  This all answered my earlier question as to why GM and International did nothing with these trucks since they were introduced, as they had basically become a market 'placeholder' with a finite life.    The Silverado Medium Duty/International CV trucks were interesting combination of a GM powertrain, electrical system, and K2XX Silverado cab with an International chassis that was supposedly designed for a step-van type vehicle they never produced.  They were manufactured in International's Springfield plant along with the IH MV series initially.  When first introduced, there was much talk that the Silverado Medium Duty/CV would eventually get a gasoline engine option along with other upgrades and GM and IH would work on a class 6/7 joint venture truck.  This was before VW bought Navistar out, after that happened no more was said.  Draw your own conclusions...   About the time talk started that the GM/IH joint venture was not going to be renewed, rumors started that GM would develop a new line of medium duty trucks themselves.  The story is the new trucks will be part of the next generation HD's due in 2028, and will still feature a 'straight rail' chassis design that the current medium duty has.  GM views this as a desirable feature that differentiates their truck from the competition.  A gasoline engine option is also expected.  As the current Silverado Medium Duty remains in production until September 2026 and there is still a lot of inventory available do not expect any official word for some time.   I believe GM remains committed to their successful partnership with Isuzu, and all the LCF models will still be available from Chevy Commercial dealers.  Isuzu is on the cusp of opening a new large plant in South Carolina and there is also speculation that this may result in new product for both Isuzu and Chevy Commercial dealers.                  
    • drive the truck back to the dealer and complain that the button works.
    • drive the truck back to the dealer and complain that the button works.
    • I have a 2026 2500 HD Ultimate. My phone app says there’s a software update available. It’s something about improved battery management and something to do with the running boards. I follow the instructions for the update but the “Check for Updates” option is greyed out in my settings menu. Has anyone else seen this? How did you resolve it? The help message just says “see your dealer” if the download doesn’t work. I’m just trying to save a trip. 
    • Fuel mileage?  That's all how you use your right foot.  Exhaust will give you sound.   Stock exhaust 5.3 is 2.75" diameter piping.     If the truck is nice and worth putting some $$ into it, I'd go for a Corsa catback.  I had one on my 2019 old body 5.3 and it was just perfect.  Zero drone, just driving around and cruising on the highway you'd think it was stock, but when you opened it up it was like a Camaro with the factory dual mode.  Corsa bumps their catback to 3in diameter.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...