Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

6TEEN5.3 Enthusiast

6TEEN5.3

Posted
Posted

Truck_2 resize final.png

 

 

Sorry for the delay. I tried posting last week using the tapatalk app, but it said my pictures were too big. I have since shrunk the photo. Here they are. I must say, what a huge and awesome change. Makes a nice luxury truck (SLT model) feel like a real truck after having the 2" level and new tires.

 

I had the 2" "Zone" level put on the front. For the tires, I put 285/55/20 BF Goodrich A/T KO2.

 

Pros

-Truck looks 10x better with the level. (Even with factory tires still on before I put new tired on it looked better)

-New BF Goodrich A/T K02 tires look great on the truck. Not over the top aggressive, but not boring either.

-No rubbing at all.

- Perfect height for what I was looking for.

 

 

Cons

-looks about like 1.5-2mpg difference - But I have mostly only driven city miles. With gas $1.80 it's no biggie.

-Noise is not an issue, but the tires are louder than factory. With radio on, you barely can even hear them.

-Slightly rougher ride when going over potholes or traintracks, but not much difference at all.

 

Overall, without a doubt I'd do this same setup again. It's not too high, not too big tires, just perfect for what I was looking for. I didn't even tell my wife I was doing it. She even said, "Man look at those tires, that looks really good...." she doesn't even pay much attention to my vehicle either. So she noticed. :)

 

 

 

That looks really sharp! That's the look I'm going for, nothing too aggressive but will catch your eye once you take a second look. Nice work

  • Like 1
  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

mrhonestlyinsane Enthusiast

mrhonestlyinsane

Posted
Posted

Anyone running 275/65/20s with the RC 2.5" kit on stock wheels?

I'm looking at the Toyo AT II the BFG KO2 and the Mickey Thompson ATZ and would like it know if anyone is running a similar size tire and can tell me if it rubs (turning, reverse, gravel/bumpy roads, offroad) and if you had to trim.

 

2014 GMC RC 2.5"

 

Thanks in advance

This can be done with no problem. I ran that size tire on my 2 inch rc level before I lifted my truck. Most you will have to do is tie back the fender liner. There are plenty of examples of this set up in this thread. I still have pics of mine in my gallery.
highspeedZ71 Enthusiast

highspeedZ71

Posted
Posted

Hey everyone, so the rough country 2.5 wants you to unplug the power steering before installation.

I'm wondering can I just disconnect the battery instead?

MOhunter92 Enthusiast

MOhunter92

Posted
Posted

Hey everyone, so the rough country 2.5 wants you to unplug the power steering before installation.

I'm wondering can I just disconnect the battery instead?

I'm guessing that would be the same thing. I heard rough country say the reasoning for it is there are sensitive sensors in the electric power steering that can be thrown off when installing the kit if they are left connected. I would rather just disconnect the plugs, seems easy enough. But battery would be just as easy

 

 

Sent from my treestand using Tapatalk

highspeedZ71 Enthusiast

highspeedZ71

Posted
Posted

Hmm that's interesting, I was wondering what the whole point to that was. I was just thinking since I'm gonna install a MIT aswell and should disconnect the battery for that I could get away with not removing that debris cover and disconnecting the connectors to the power steering

Patflynn8734 Enthusiast

Patflynn8734

Posted
Posted

This can be done with no problem. I ran that size tire on my 2 inch rc level before I lifted my truck. Most you will have to do is tie back the fender liner. There are plenty of examples of this set up in this thread. I still have pics of mine in my gallery.

 

 

Did it rub any on rough roads or during full turn after you tied back the fender? And what did you use to tie the fender back?

5RWill Enthusiast

5RWill

Posted
Posted (edited)

I always chuckle when I see those kind of posts. They act like a longer strut is better than a spacer giving you a longer strut.. Lol angles are the same, and nothing is really better feeling than the factory set up. You pay for a so so ride and less lift than a spacer kit lol just doesn't make sense. I'm gonna go with the RCX 2.5 then when the truck is out of warranty bds 4 inch

 

 

Sent from my treestand using Tapatalk

 

For the Billies at least, lift isn't achieved due to a longer strut it's due to the springs. Angles aren't entirely the same in the case of Bilsteins either, 1.8" =/= 2.50" there is a reason Bilstein went with 1.8" you could argue that angles are nearly the same with a 2" spacer which is a better comparison, but your still extending the strut with the spacer. Having ridden in both and been in both i'll take my Billy's every day of the week over spacer kits. Of course there are struts that are much longer, but Bilsteins are 1/4th an inch longer than factory. My brothers truck rides like crap (RC2), My cousin's the same (RC 2.5). At the end of the day it's preference and what your willing to spend. Had i had it to do over again i just would've went with more and waited on 6112s and gotten rear shocks with reservoirs. In the end they both work, i vastly prefer one over the other though.

http://www.bilsteinus.com/fileadmin/user_upload/user_upload_us/pdfs/Bil_LevShks_WebArticle.pdf

Edited by 5RWill
Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted

 

For the Billies at least, lift isn't achieved due to a longer strut it's due to the springs.

I agree that Bilstein's are a good shock but they do increase strut length to achieve lift. They increase strut length by a different method. You will have the same new angles imposed on your other suspension components as a spacer of the same amount of lift. With a 1.5" - 2" spacer lift you should not notice a poorer ride quality than stock. If you do, and have not changed tires, I would get in for service. The Bilsteins have a good reputation for providing a nicer ride than stock.

5RWill Enthusiast

5RWill

Posted
Posted

The quarter inch might facilitate some help in achieving the lift but the literal length of the strut isn't what's causing the lift. It's the "pre-load" if you will on the spring. Maybe I'm misinterpreting what your saying. Are you saying that by doing that they're basically increasing the length of the strut in a different way?

 

As to the spacer kits as I said its personal preference. I strongly dislike how my brothers truck rides. Before with stock tires and after with duratracs. I will say my cousins is a little better albeit not much. My brother has stock gm shocks and my cousin has the ranchos that come on the z71

Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted

The quarter inch might facilitate some help in achieving the lift but the literal length of the strut isn't what's causing the lift. It's the "pre-load" if you will on the spring. Maybe I'm misinterpreting what your saying. Are you saying that by doing that they're basically increasing the length of the strut in a different way?

My understanding is that by raising the perch you are pre-loading the spring which in turn is creating lift. The end result is you have increased the distance between the top mount of the strut and the bottom mount. The angles of your control arms etc. will be impacted in the same manner as a spacer of equal lift height. I don't have any special expertise in this area, I'm simply sharing my understanding from the reading i have done. Money is the main reason I chose a spacer over Bilsteins! There are many who report a rougher ride from Bilsteins at max height and there are those that report a rough ride from 2" leveling spacers. The research I have done favors no noticeable negative impact in ride quality from either method.

5RWill Enthusiast

5RWill

Posted
Posted (edited)

I agree the angles are the same of the desired lift either way. But the Bilsteins aren't limiting upward suspension travel just changing the static ride height of the truck. At least that is how I understand it from all that I've read as to why someone would want the Bilsteins over spacers. Maybe spurshot or someone else knowledgeable will chime in and elaborate.

 

Either way they both get the job done and if your not ramping and pre-running your unlikely to run into problems.

Edited by 5RWill
mmwest Enthusiast

mmwest

Posted
Posted

Here is my dilemma.I currently have a 2 1/2 inch rough country lift that rides pretty rough.I am going to put 5100s on the front but I'm indecisive on to set it at the middle setting and leave the top spacer or put it on the top setting of the 5100 shock.I'm looking for the best ride and also to maintain my 275/65/20's BFGoodrich.

It's hind site now but I regret putting the 2.5"rough country lift on there. Any help on the situation will be greatly appreciated thanks

tyrich88 Enthusiast

tyrich88

Posted
Posted

Here is my dilemma.I currently have a 2 1/2 inch rough country lift that rides pretty rough.I am going to put 5100s on the front but I'm indecisive on to set it at the middle setting and leave the top spacer or put it on the top setting of the 5100 shock.I'm looking for the best ride and also to maintain my 275/65/20's BFGoodrich.

It's hind site now but I regret putting the 2.5"rough country lift on there. Any help on the situation will be greatly appreciated thanks

You could always go with the Rancho quick lifts

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      Post Pics of your "Other" Rides

      By KARNUT · Posted

      Well one of our most reliable vehicles was sold yesterday. The first and only I gave for free to a grandkid. If they got skin in the game they take care of it. My wife bought new. Five years later my daughter got it to use. We got it back and gave it to our grandson after graduation. He did zero maintenance just oil changes. When the AC quit he drove his mother’s car rather than get it fixed. Instead he just bought a beater and sold the Elantra. 
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      I usually do as well or better than the sticker for mileage. Usually better going west than east. North then South. Wind makes a difference. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist. But it did dawn on me I’m going by the vehicle calculation. Now that would be interesting.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/fuel-economy-stickers-don-t-tell-the-whole-story-aaa-data-reveals-why/ar-AA26ocHk?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=6a4122ea3dae47e5b8dfbed5d4fd3d55&cvpid=648f6b4fc2fa4eddb4c12893aeb957ed&ei=59
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      What’s missing in all this is patience and investment in the future. Buy a 170K starter home. Ten years later sell it invest in a more expensive home. Eventually you’ll have a 600K home and pay starter home payments. Buy a starter car. Maintain it well. Save the payments after it’s payed for then buy an expensive car if you desire. Buy a tumbler make your own coffee, pack your lunch. Cook your own dinner. Most importantly take care of your car.
    • Atlas
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Atlas · Posted

      People mislead themselves. Statistics are highly useful indicators.   Here's the tie-in to this thread. If an oil sample tests shows a wear indicator of 7 using cheaper ACDelco oil, and a wear indicator of 2 (lower = less wear) using a particular brand of Mobil oil, and wear has a linear relationship with engine lifespan, anyone could assume that Mobil is reducing wear by more than 50% (let's just say a 200% reduction for you red state people trying hard to do math) which leads to increasing engine life by 2x. Perhaps, in a vacuum, by itself, when dreamed by AI.   Yeah?! That's what the statistic is saying, isn't it?   No, it isn't. It didn't come out and say engine life is doubled. That's a very bad assumption, and a case of severe myopia by assuming something potentially untrue about the only data point in focus.   Average cost of a new car is 50k. You bet it is.   The median cost of a new car is more like 35k. Expensive cars are skewing the perception that "average" now means a $50k price of entry for a very average automobile. And that's not true. People who don't understand statistics twist the living heck out of them to mean all sorts of things they don't actually mean.   "Average" new car payment is $1000/month. Yep, it is. And in that number are all the $35k new car buyers who bring significant equity, and the $25k new car buyers who finance the car for a month just to get a rebate, and then pay it off. Know what isn't in that number? All the payments made by people who don't finance a car.   Picking one's own data point (don't have a car payment, never paid $50k for a new vehicle, my house cost $170k, I afforded a middle class lifestyle on $4.50/hr) is just a data point. Just like earning $25/hr in an area where the median home price is almost $1 Million is a data point. In fact, it's a lot of data points given that 80% of the US population lives in/around major cities. They're not idiots; the vast majority of them do it to make a living because that's where the big money is.   The highs have become higher, lows have become lower, and how your personal mileage varies is not truth for an entire country. At the same time you can't NOT acknowledge the data. While it doesn't paint YOUR personal picture, it certainly tints the reality that you also live in, as does your single data point.    

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...