Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone have pictures of a 2.5" rough country level kit installed but without the top 1/2" spacer in the front?
Basically just the lower 2" spacer in the front and the 2" block in the rear.

Im looking to get almost level but still keep a slight rake and also not mess with the front springs compression from that 1/2" spacer.

  • Like 1
Posted

You could just do the 2" front level and You would end up about 3/4" higher in the rear after everything settles out.

Posted

There are pics of my truck 1 page back with just the 2" level.

Posted

 

With a 2" level, I fit my 305/65/18s with zero trimming and zero rubbing, even at full lock in reverse. They measure 33.7x12.1, and even .1" more, and it would rub. I think I found the absolute limit for size on these new trucks with just a 2".

How much have you been offroad with that size? They look great!

Posted

Hi guys I am new here and been reading this thread this for awhile. I have a 2017 SLT all terrain and was hopping to do the RC 2.5" kit but once I realized that the top spacer goes in the coil instead of the over the strut on the 2017 models I decided against it. I noticed that motofab makes a couple of different options for a 2.5" level kit. I was wondering if anyone has used this kit http://www.motofablifts.com/product-p/ch-25lm.htm ? I also find it weird that rough country makes you conform what control arms you have for there leveling kits but motofab does not? Also I have not found anyone else that makes a 2.5" bottom mount level besides motofab. Is there a benefit from using a 2" spacer on the bottom and a 1/2" on the top instead of just using a 2.5" on the bottom alone? thanks in advance for any help with this!

I had a terrible experience with Motofab. Long story short, they told me the lower strut spacers would work for my '16 and they did not.

 

Before placing my order, they were very quick to answer all of my qualifying questions, but when i tried to reach out for a refund, I NEVER heard from them (after multiple attempts). Luckily I purchased through amazon, or I would have never received a refund. Moving forward I will go with anyone but them due to the lack of customer service and would advise others the same in case there happens to be an issue.

 

That said, if you do the top spacer, you should be alright since they are all pretty standard and a solid billet material

Posted

Hypothetical question for those more qualified than myself - Trying to get some more height out of mine without having to do a full lift kit

 

Keep my Bilstein 5100 at the 1.25" setting and do a 2.5" Top strut spacer (totaling 3.75") WITH aftermarket UCAs - would this work?

 

Or would it be a better option to just do a 1 inch body on top of a 2.5 inch level totaling 3.5 inches?

Posted

Hypothetical question for those more qualified than myself - Trying to get some more height out of mine without having to do a full lift kit

 

Keep my Bilstein 5100 at the 1.25" setting and do a 2.5" Top strut spacer (totaling 3.75") WITH aftermarket UCAs - would this work?

 

Or would it be a better option to just do a 1 inch body on top of a 2.5 inch level totaling 3.5 inches?

that would DESTROY your front end components. TREs, BJs, CVs would all be ruined

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I had a terrible experience with Motofab. Long story short, they told me the lower strut spacers would work for my '16 and they did not.

 

Before placing my order, they were very quick to answer all of my qualifying questions, but when i tried to reach out for a refund, I NEVER heard from them (after multiple attempts). Luckily I purchased through amazon, or I would have never received a refund. Moving forward I will go with anyone but them due to the lack of customer service and would advise others the same in case there happens to be an issue.

 

That said, if you do the top spacer, you should be alright since they are all pretty standard and a solid billet material

 

Can I ask what didn't work with the Motofab on the bottom? I was looking at there 1.5".

Posted

 

I had a terrible experience with Motofab. Long story short, they told me the lower strut spacers would work for my '16 and they did not.

 

Before placing my order, they were very quick to answer all of my qualifying questions, but when i tried to reach out for a refund, I NEVER heard from them (after multiple attempts). Luckily I purchased through amazon, or I would have never received a refund. Moving forward I will go with anyone but them due to the lack of customer service and would advise others the same in case there happens to be an issue.

 

That said, if you do the top spacer, you should be alright since they are all pretty standard and a solid billet material

 

Can I ask what didn't work with the Motofab on the bottom? I was looking at there 1.5".

 

 

Sure. So I was told by a local shop out here (that has about 15+ years or so in lifting/working on lifted trucks) that since I have the stamped steel control arms, the lower strut spacer would not sit correctly. Top worked perfectly and could have ultimately used a motofab top, but i went with pro-comp based on principle.

Posted

 

Sure. So I was told by a local shop out here (that has about 15+ years or so in lifting/working on lifted trucks) that since I have the stamped steel control arms, the lower strut spacer would not sit correctly. Top worked perfectly and could have ultimately used a motofab top, but i went with pro-comp based on principle.

That's weird. The strut has 2 flat tabs that the spacer sits on. You would think flat is flat. Isn't rough country and all the others the same?

Posted (edited)

Hypothetical question for those more qualified than myself - Trying to get some more height out of mine without having to do a full lift kit

 

Keep my Bilstein 5100 at the 1.25" setting and do a 2.5" Top strut spacer (totaling 3.75") WITH aftermarket UCAs - would this work?

 

Or would it be a better option to just do a 1 inch body on top of a 2.5 inch level totaling 3.5 inches?

I know people say more than 2.5" is bad for your suspension, but I had a very similar set-up. I had the Rough Country 2" lower strut spacer and the Bilstein's cranked up to the max height, which put me at about 3.75" up front...I didn't have aftermarket UCAs, though I would have added them soon had I kept the truck. I had 285/75r18 Nitto G2s with stock rims and I was off-road quite a bit and no issues. I didn't keep the truck long-term and traded it for a 2500 at about 50k miles, but I had zero issues with my set-up and loved the way it looked.

Edited by atay2011
Posted

I know people say more than 2.5" is bad for your suspension, but I had a very similar set-up. I had the Rough Country 2" lower strut spacer and the Bilstein's cranked up to the max height, which put me at about 3.75" up front...I didn't have aftermarket UCAs, though I would have added them soon had I kept the truck. I had 285/75r18 Nitto G2s with stock rims and I was off-road quite a bit and no issues. I didn't keep the truck long-term and traded it for a 2500 at about 50k miles, but I had zero issues with my set-up and loved the way it looked.

You dont happen to have any pics of the truck do you? would love to see what it looked like at that size

Posted

You dont happen to have any pics of the truck do you? would love to see what it looked like at that size

Here's what I have left of pics:

 

with NItto G2s 285/75r18, 2" level + Bilstein 1.75"

truck 5

Posted

 

Here's what I have left of pics:

 

Looks great!

It would put some accelerated wear on ball joints and such, so if it were mine I would replace the control arms...

how did it ride?

Posted

Anyone know of the biggest size tire I can fit on a 2" leveling kit 2wd silverado. I'm wanting to go with a 20x10 -24 offset.

 

 

TexasSilverado16

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...