Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

FWIW guys I put the '16 magneride kit on my 17 Denali last night, everything fit perfect front & back. When I called RC to ask why the kit wouldn't work on a '17 all they would say is "the hardware doesn't fit"....clearly this is not the case. I work at a GMC dealership so I'll have the guys check it every now and then but it doesn't appear that the front end is sitting at any kind of weird angles, and the ride is awesome - zero noticeable difference from stock. Now my 275/65r20s are going on today!

Edited by frzrbrnbass
  • Like 1
Posted

FWIW guys I put the '16 magneride kit on my 17 Denali last night, everything fit perfect front & back. When I called RC to ask why the kit wouldn't work on a '17 all they would say is "the hardware doesn't fit"....clearly this is not the case. I work at a GMC dealership so I'll have the guys check it every now and then but it doesn't appear that the front end is sitting at any kind of weird angles, and the ride is awesome - zero noticeable difference from stock. Now my 275/65r20s are going on today!

This is what they said to me as well ! They said with the top spacer in that there is some issue with the electric power steering at full extension or something. Might bend the steering linkage ?

 

Was the top spacer plastic or metal ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

This is what they said to me as well ! They said with the top spacer in that there is some issue with the electric power steering at full extension or something. Might bend the steering linkage ?

 

Was the top spacer plastic or metal ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The spacer was metal. I'll have the guys put it on the alignment rack today and take a look at everything, try to get some pictures at different steering angles too.

Posted

Ok, just got off the phone with Chuck @ rough country & finally got an answer that seems to make some sense.

 

The 2017's come with stamped steel control arms vs cast aluminum in the 16's. The stamped steel ones are larger than the cast ones.

 

To get the kit to work for a 17 we need to use a preload spacer rather than the top strut mount spacer to avoid the control arm hitting the steering linkage arm at full extension / full turn.

 

Using a preload spacer should maintain the stock geometry better than a top mount spacer which is why they chose this route I guess.

Although it isn't officially offered, he said if we call in they can sell you the 16 kit but swap the top spacer for a preload.

 

Now the question is, can we tear these Magneride struts apart without messing them up ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

This is the problem ... only change was the stamped control arms .. now they say you can't use the top spacer & they don't have a kit for the rear .. just 2" level kit for the front ... frustrating to say the least.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

FWIW guys I put the '16 magneride kit on my 17 Denali last night, everything fit perfect front & back. When I called RC to ask why the kit wouldn't work on a '17 all they would say is "the hardware doesn't fit"....clearly this is not the case. I work at a GMC dealership so I'll have the guys check it every now and then but it doesn't appear that the front end is sitting at any kind of weird angles, and the ride is awesome - zero noticeable difference from stock. Now my 275/65r20s are going on today!

 

 

This is what they said to me as well ! They said with the top spacer in that there is some issue with the electric power steering at full extension or something. Might bend the steering linkage ?

 

Was the top spacer plastic or metal ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

The spacer was metal. I'll have the guys put it on the alignment rack today and take a look at everything, try to get some pictures at different steering angles too.

 

 

Awesome !! Thanks man !! I kinda think RC haven't taken the time to see if it works on the 17 so they are just playing it safe and saying it doesn't

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Ok, just got off the phone with Chuck @ rough country & finally got an answer that seems to make some sense.

 

The 2017's come with stamped steel control arms vs cast aluminum in the 16's. The stamped steel ones are larger than the cast ones.

 

To get the kit to work for a 17 we need to use a preload spacer rather than the top strut mount spacer to avoid the control arm hitting the steering linkage arm at full extension / full turn.

 

Using a preload spacer should maintain the stock geometry better than a top mount spacer which is why they chose this route I guess.

Although it isn't officially offered, he said if we call in they can sell you the 16 kit but swap the top spacer for a preload.

 

Now the question is, can we tear these Magneride struts apart without messing them up ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

What is wrong with this kit?

http://www.roughcountry.com/gmc-leveling-lift-kit-1311.html

 

Hardly seems worth taking risks with a $70K truck for the sake of an extra half-inch of lift. Use this one, which is approved for the '17 and call it good.

Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is wrong with this kit?

http://www.roughcountry.com/gmc-leveling-lift-kit-1311.html

 

Hardly seems worth taking risks with a $70K truck for the sake of an extra half-inch of lift. Use this one, which is approved for the '17 and call it good.

That's just the front (level)

 

I want the whole thing up 2"

 

What I actually have done since I couldn't really find exactly what I wanted is,

 

I ordered the kit that you linked above, I also have a shop where i fabbed up some 3" blocks and bought some square u bolts.

 

I'm swapping the stock 1.25" block for a 3" which will give me 1.75" of lift in the rear & that kit you linked will give me 2" in the front which is perfect for me. I am making my own Magneride extension brackets ( if I still have issues with the ride quality I'm going to get the dealer to just "re-zero" the sensors at the new height and do away with the brackets.

 

Front went in after work last night and weather permitting rears will be done today.

 

 

02ee40dffce93aaccbc778f7c1b4fea7.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Just use some 3/16 rod stock from Lowe's to extend Magneride sensor link. It will look factory and you will not have to deal with those cheesey brackets.

Cost less than $3

Posted

Do they just press into the plastic fitting ?

 

I just found out that GM can do a magneride "zero" calibration (teaches the computer where normal ride height is) as another option.

 

I did cheesy brackets for now and they are working great ! Ride is perfect (just need to get alignment tomorrow)

 

I put the rough country 2" lift in the front & custom made my own blocks for the rear

 

Here's a photo of my custom made 3" block (gives 1.75" of lift)

de9c04f3427c720d28c168ddddd2407f.jpg

 

I didn't want a level I still wanted a little bit of rake.

 

Needs a wash but I'm very happy with it ! 0c6419607a41a0c049dc2d506c96020b.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Do they just press into the plastic fitting ?

 

I just found out that GM can do a magneride "zero" calibration (teaches the computer where normal ride height is) as another option.

 

I did cheesy brackets for now and they are working great ! Ride is perfect (just need to get alignment tomorrow)

 

I put the rough country 2" lift in the front & custom made my own blocks for the rear

 

Here's a photo of my custom made 3" block (gives 1.75" of lift)

de9c04f3427c720d28c168ddddd2407f.jpg

 

I didn't want a level I still wanted a little bit of rake.

 

Needs a wash but I'm very happy with it ! 0c6419607a41a0c049dc2d506c96020b.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

stance looks great, now you just need to upgrade your tires to help fill the gap a bit! :)

Posted

stance looks great, now you just need to upgrade your tires to help fill the gap a bit! :)

Yup they are looking into It for me .. options are pretty limited on the stock 22" rims which I do like and am keeping

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

b48270f3f3f7423290f2e49456e5fa02.jpg02499f667a05bf2c128ab87ca77b9ecc.jpg

 

Here's my '17 with a 2.5" front Motofab and a 3" block in the rear. Got a good little rake to it but damn it looks good!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Do you have any side pictures with the 2.5 front and 3.0 back ? I've got a DC with a 2.0 front and 2,0 block in back now and I have 2.0 of rake. I'm adding the top spacer for 2.5 and can't decide between 2.5 or 3.0 block in rear. 2.0 of rake seems to work well for towing. How much rake do you have on yours ? Thanks

Posted

Finally got some new tires after leveling. LT275/70/17 Mickey Thompson Deegan 38s.

 

Only pic I have on the phone right now. Top was original, middle is how it sits now, bottom was a little photoshop. Going to get tint next and I might paint the wheels a gunmetal color and wanted to see how it looked. Color match bumper would be nice too but my wife isn't going to sign off on that.

 

2aa615a10fda97f17a98816e88b1d3ac.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's good photo shopping, what program is that?

Posted

That's good photo shopping, what program is that?

I actually did that on Bluebeam. They're just colored shapes with the opacity reduced.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I actually did that on Bluebeam. They're just colored shapes with the opacity reduced.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'll look into that, paint match bumper look sick!

post-155210-0-15350600-1502916706_thumb.jpg

post-155210-0-15350600-1502916706_thumb.jpg

post-155210-0-15350600-1502916706_thumb.jpg

post-155210-0-15350600-1502916706_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No doubt... But, as someone who doesn't pay for his services, but who has provided a few views/clicks on his Youtube platform, the data around the Mobil oil testing I think does have some value including to "freeloaders" like me.   A lot of what he's doing is likely showing the OE's work in their oil selection, something that many of us had kind of assumed was true all along, a good balance of both excellent protection and efficiency.
    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...