Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well hell when using their search engine i was putting 2014 gmc and all that came up was the 7000MT, if the quicklift loaded fits the 2014 chevy LTZ 4WD it should very well fit the 2014 GMC SLT 4WD should it not?

for some reason they say if your truck came with rancho shocks it won't fit. Did yours? My understanding it will fit z71 but won't give a full 2" lift. I could be wrong. A local company that lifts trucks is installing mine Wednesday.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Well hell when using their search engine i was putting 2014 gmc and all that came up was the 7000MT, if the quicklift loaded fits the 2014 chevy LTZ 4WD it should very well fit the 2014 GMC SLT 4WD should it not?

i just entered gmc 2014 1500 4wd on go rancho .com and it pulls up the same quicklift loaded fits. Not sure what u entered

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

http://zoneoffroad.com/bad-to-the-bone?id=825

 

If you have not seen this I was looking at the 72 pages and found this on the zone site.

 

14 1500 with 2in level 35/12.5/20's

 

Would love to know if this works in the real world.

Tried to respond to your message but couldn't get it to work. Regarding my truck: No blocks in back, 2.5 inch lift in front that was dealer installed before I bought it, so I don't know what brand it is. Tire size is in my signature block on all my posts. Good luck with yours.

Posted

for some reason they say if your truck came with rancho shocks it won't fit. Did yours? My understanding it will fit z71 but won't give a full 2" lift. I could be wrong. A local company that lifts trucks is installing mine Wednesday.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That should only be if you have an AT with the larger front rancho shocks

 

This is what I have been told and research has shown.

Posted

I finally got my tires in from tire rack and my motofab 2" level blocks in that I picked up for 39.99 on amazon. got the blocks installed alone in a little under 2 hours last Wednesday night, and got the 275/70/18 general grabber at2's mounted and the truck aligned up Friday morning. Really happy with how everything turned out. Didn't think it would look lifted but its very notable. Much more than I expected. I like the firmer ride and it actually feels like a solid truck to me now. I also removed the front air dam and coated the wheels with plasti as protection for the winter.

 

 

IMG_3067_zpse315c21f.jpg

 

IMG_3111_zpse16bdd9f.jpg

 

IMG_3093_zpsdb77195c.jpg

 

IMG_3097_zps40a81de6.jpg

 

 

 

image_zps32403a89.jpg

 

image_zpsc9cd34eb.jpg

Would like to see a side pic of ur truck with the black rims.
Posted

for some reason they say if your truck came with rancho shocks it won't fit. Did yours? My understanding it will fit z71 but won't give a full 2" lift. I could be wrong. A local company that lifts trucks is installing mine Wednesday.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I have a z71 and it came with rancho shocks. I entered gmc 2014 SLT 4wd and only get the 7000mt.

Posted

 

I highly doubt the leveling kit has to do with your truck hoping all over the place. If the Rancho Shocks are stiffer then the stock ones in will probably make your issue worse.

no I pull a trailer 5 days a week. Only does it when I pull because front is raised so much because of spacer. Just FYI

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

 

 

Spacer or Longer strut is the same......no difference :)

we will see. I'll be doing a review under my other thread. My last 2014 silverado I had leveling kit and air bags in rear. Still hoped in the front while pulling trailer only when I hit a bump. So going more expensive route by replacing whole strut and still giving it a level look.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

we will see. I'll be doing a review under my other thread. My last 2014 silverado I had leveling kit and air bags in rear. Still hoped in the front while pulling trailer only when I hit a bump. So going more expensive route by replacing whole strut and still giving it a level look.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

 

 

So the front is hopping off the ground when towing your trailer? Have you checked the tongue weight and are you using a load leveling hitch?

Posted

I misread your post but the plasti info is there for anyone who needs it ha. I only have one other picture of my truck and its in my garage at an angle. Ill take a few side shots soon.

 

IMG_3122_zpsd91147a5.jpg

Truck looks great man! Thanks for the info on the plasti dip

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

So the front is hopping off the ground when towing your trailer? Have you checked the tongue weight and are you using a load leveling hitch?

when I would tow before a leveling kit it never hoped. Problem is I like the look of it level but when u tow it's not level anymore. It's not that bad. I'm not saying it just hope everywhere. Just doesn't feel safe when I hit a bump or go off road without a trailer. Just looking for something more durable besides a $65 RC kit that I have. Want something that is not going to wear all my other components so that's why I have chose rancho quicklift loaded. Like I've said. I'm getting it installed Wednesday so we will see how it rides. They have a 30 day money back guarantee.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

The issue with any leveling method is the UCA balljoint angle of the OEM balljoint. When I installed my king shocks, I also installed Cognito UCA s with larger ball joints.

Posted

The issue with any leveling method is the UCA balljoint angle of the OEM balljoint. When I installed my king shocks, I also installed Cognito UCA s with larger ball joints.

 

Wondering if i should do the same when i get bilsteins. I likely will for added assurance but it would definitely be down the road.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,863
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Bulldogger
    Newest Member
    Bulldogger
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 794 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...