Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

Having the zone 2 inch level installed this morning at 10:30. Still undecided on perfect tire size. Won't be off road but want a better stance with no rub problems. So many options here on this thread. 2 inch level up front. Stock block in back. Using my stock 20's I need a tire choice that's gonnagive me more rubber without sticking out the sides. Thoughts?

EDIT: zone 2 inch with G2 285/55/20.

 

No such thing as "perfect size". Just what you like...and sometimes even that changes. Pretty quickly sometimes. If you're not going off-road, stick with a mild A/T type tread or even a street tread. You'll be happier in the long run. They are quieter, ride nice, and generally have less rolling resistance.

baggedlvintegra Enthusiast

baggedlvintegra

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

Shocks like the Kings and Fox may have longer extension than stock. Frankly, I didn't measure my Kings against the OEM Ranchos for full extended free length when they were out of the truck. I installed the Cognito UCAs because I knew that GMT900 trucks needed them with the King shocks and these trucks use the same suspension.

 

Anyone using spacers like the RC kit, might benefit from an aftermarket UCA with the adjusted ball joint angle. I just don't sign up to the idea a dry Teflon socket with a steel ball, exposed to the dirt and elements, is going to last very long. I hear they also develop a squeak.

 

For anyone contemplating an aftermarket UCA, forget about the cheapest one on the market @ $250, the Rough Country UCA. It is designed poorly and interferes with the frame fittings. No amount of grinding on the frame as they recommend, allows for complete factory camber/caster adjustment range.

 

DSC_2686Medium_zpsf64e14e3.jpg

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts. Edited by baggedlvintegra
Aldila Enthusiast

Aldila

Posted
Posted

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts.

Are u still running the rcx 2 inch level?

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts.

 

 

Well, it really isn't about whether you disagree or not. The fact is it doesn't make them fit my truck.

 

You can see in the picture that the full camber/caster adjustment isn't possible with the RC UCA, even after I ground over 1/2" off my frame, down to the point of the camber/caster indexing cam pin. Regardless of the leveling, the UCA has to travel the same path unimpeded when the suspension compresses. RC just didn't put the small dogleg in the beam like the factory and every other UCA maker selling them for this truck.

 

The facts are that the control arms were represented to me by a RC sales staffer to work with King shocks at 2" level and that full factory range of adjustment is not achievable with the RC UCA.

 

You might want to check your UCAs for rubbing on the frame in this area during full suspension travel.

baggedlvintegra Enthusiast

baggedlvintegra

Posted
Posted

 

 

Well, it really isn't about whether you disagree or not. The fact is it doesn't make them fit my truck.

 

You can see in the picture that the full camber/caster adjustment isn't possible with the RC UCA, even after I ground over 1/2" off my frame, down to the point of the camber/caster indexing cam pin. Regardless of the leveling, the UCA has to travel the same path unimpeded when the suspension compresses. RC just didn't put the small dogleg in the beam like the factory and every other UCA maker selling them for this truck.

 

The facts are that the control arms were represented to me by a RC sales staffer to work with King shocks at 2" level and that full factory range of adjustment is not achievable with the RC UCA.

 

You might want to check your UCAs for rubbing on the frame in this area during full suspension travel.

Yeah I checked my clearance because your pics scared me, to the point I almost didn't order the UCAs, but mine don't have any issues like yours did.

Mike1220 Senior Enthusiast

Mike1220

Posted
Posted

Negative they make a +1,+14, and +20 in the 20x9

I believe it's +14 or 18. Fuel only makes the 20x9 in one offset

never_rested_24-7 is right. They make those sizes and the only difference between the 3 is the amount of backspacing. The lip size is all the same though. About 1.83" or some odd number like that.

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted (edited)

Yeah I checked my clearance because your pics scared me, to the point I almost didn't order the UCAs, but mine don't have any issues like yours did.

 

 

Sorry, I shouldn't have jumped down your throat. I just don't like aftermarket parts that don't fit right. One of my pet peeves.

 

In this pic, you can see RC took a direct line to the bushing on that leg of the UCA. The tube cuts across over to the bushing and intersects it at an angle. (the tubes on the outside of the pic)

DSC_2649Large_zps06776ba1.jpg

 

On the Cognito, they put a dog leg in the beam to that side, which goes in to the bushing at a straight approach. (the leg by the logo)

20141119_203132_zpszqpayi1u.jpg

Edited by spurshot
  • Like 1
Dbotello1983 Enthusiast

Dbotello1983

Posted
Posted (edited)

I just bought my 2014 GMC Sierra All Terrain Edition. I was to use my stock 20" wheels and add 33"x12.50R20 toyo rt tires. What lift would you guys recommend and why? Trying to avoid any rubbing or clearance issues and looking to install level kit myself. Thanks

Edited by Dbotello1983

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I don't know how far back vehicles had hour meters, be it driver accessible or diag accessible but was wondering if there was any rule of thumb your shop came up with in regards to an hour limit on engine oil regardless of the miles on the oil.    I know with construction or farm equipment its almost always based on engine hours for maintenance scheduling as no other metric really applies other than a seasonal time limit that one self imposes on items like engine oil.  
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I'm not sure what to say on that mess but I will say that is an odd thing for that mechanic to speculate on as per assuming its been run out of oil a few times as the odds of that engine having instead piled up with a complete seizure would be very high if such events had actually taken place. However there is nothing saying that the oil has ever been changed although once again, what filter was on that engine as that would tell part of the story if its possible to figure out if its a factory installed filter or not. Too many items unknown and a lot of speculation, but regardless of that its one fubared mess that is mind boggling to see for a vehicle that new and its hard to imagine how it ever made it that far in life looking at the top of the engine.    His scanners, I've watched him before here and there and I'd have to say if I recall correctly that some of his scanning equipment is one or two steps up from a child's Exo Sketch 😋
    • PunchT37
      OCI, not when but why?

      By PunchT37 · Posted

      I agree. That`s a LOT of sludge for 12,000 miles. I tossed that out here since this is an OCI thread. There`s tons of people here that do not post.   I used to work on a city fleet. That includes police cars and fire trucks. Lesson is, not to only use the odo for oci. A police car has a ton of hours on the engine for the miles it shows. And, not just idling, directing traffic. They beat on these things.   Course, since it is a Kia, they were gonna use the "100,000 mile warranty" for their OCI.😉
    • AlVeron
      Manufactuer's Defect - Paint Failure - Cherry Red High Country 2021 Suburban

      By AlVeron · Posted

      CLASS ACTION SUITS?  Does anyone know if there is already a class action suit for the paint - which was to have been fixed, changed in after the 2020 GM vehicles?  Does it look like this?    Just started 3 weeks ago - No help from GM as of yet - Dealer will not assist in speaking with GM on my behalf. Confirmed it is the paint they use along with the way the put it on that causes it to fail.  Clearly a Manufacturer's Defect. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      That dog don't hunt. 😏   First, a 2025 with 12K on the clock AND idled for a year nonstop is false on it's face; this is 2026. You can do one or the other but not both.    Second, ENGINE HOURS are absolutely available. The rest is third grade math. Micky Mouse scanner he got out of a box of Cracker Jacks OR an ID10T error.    Third, if they ran it out of oil "Several times" that motor is boned on the first hit.    Does this guy think piling higher makes it stink less? 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...