Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Having the zone 2 inch level installed this morning at 10:30. Still undecided on perfect tire size. Won't be off road but want a better stance with no rub problems. So many options here on this thread. 2 inch level up front. Stock block in back. Using my stock 20's I need a tire choice that's gonnagive me more rubber without sticking out the sides. Thoughts?

EDIT: zone 2 inch with G2 285/55/20.

 

No such thing as "perfect size". Just what you like...and sometimes even that changes. Pretty quickly sometimes. If you're not going off-road, stick with a mild A/T type tread or even a street tread. You'll be happier in the long run. They are quieter, ride nice, and generally have less rolling resistance.

Posted (edited)

 

Shocks like the Kings and Fox may have longer extension than stock. Frankly, I didn't measure my Kings against the OEM Ranchos for full extended free length when they were out of the truck. I installed the Cognito UCAs because I knew that GMT900 trucks needed them with the King shocks and these trucks use the same suspension.

 

Anyone using spacers like the RC kit, might benefit from an aftermarket UCA with the adjusted ball joint angle. I just don't sign up to the idea a dry Teflon socket with a steel ball, exposed to the dirt and elements, is going to last very long. I hear they also develop a squeak.

 

For anyone contemplating an aftermarket UCA, forget about the cheapest one on the market @ $250, the Rough Country UCA. It is designed poorly and interferes with the frame fittings. No amount of grinding on the frame as they recommend, allows for complete factory camber/caster adjustment range.

 

DSC_2686Medium_zpsf64e14e3.jpg

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts. Edited by baggedlvintegra
Posted

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts.

Are u still running the rcx 2 inch level?

Posted

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts.

 

 

Well, it really isn't about whether you disagree or not. The fact is it doesn't make them fit my truck.

 

You can see in the picture that the full camber/caster adjustment isn't possible with the RC UCA, even after I ground over 1/2" off my frame, down to the point of the camber/caster indexing cam pin. Regardless of the leveling, the UCA has to travel the same path unimpeded when the suspension compresses. RC just didn't put the small dogleg in the beam like the factory and every other UCA maker selling them for this truck.

 

The facts are that the control arms were represented to me by a RC sales staffer to work with King shocks at 2" level and that full factory range of adjustment is not achievable with the RC UCA.

 

You might want to check your UCAs for rubbing on the frame in this area during full suspension travel.

Posted

 

 

Well, it really isn't about whether you disagree or not. The fact is it doesn't make them fit my truck.

 

You can see in the picture that the full camber/caster adjustment isn't possible with the RC UCA, even after I ground over 1/2" off my frame, down to the point of the camber/caster indexing cam pin. Regardless of the leveling, the UCA has to travel the same path unimpeded when the suspension compresses. RC just didn't put the small dogleg in the beam like the factory and every other UCA maker selling them for this truck.

 

The facts are that the control arms were represented to me by a RC sales staffer to work with King shocks at 2" level and that full factory range of adjustment is not achievable with the RC UCA.

 

You might want to check your UCAs for rubbing on the frame in this area during full suspension travel.

Yeah I checked my clearance because your pics scared me, to the point I almost didn't order the UCAs, but mine don't have any issues like yours did.

Posted

Negative they make a +1,+14, and +20 in the 20x9

I believe it's +14 or 18. Fuel only makes the 20x9 in one offset

never_rested_24-7 is right. They make those sizes and the only difference between the 3 is the amount of backspacing. The lip size is all the same though. About 1.83" or some odd number like that.

Posted (edited)

Yeah I checked my clearance because your pics scared me, to the point I almost didn't order the UCAs, but mine don't have any issues like yours did.

 

 

Sorry, I shouldn't have jumped down your throat. I just don't like aftermarket parts that don't fit right. One of my pet peeves.

 

In this pic, you can see RC took a direct line to the bushing on that leg of the UCA. The tube cuts across over to the bushing and intersects it at an angle. (the tubes on the outside of the pic)

DSC_2649Large_zps06776ba1.jpg

 

On the Cognito, they put a dog leg in the beam to that side, which goes in to the bushing at a straight approach. (the leg by the logo)

20141119_203132_zpszqpayi1u.jpg

Edited by spurshot
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I just bought my 2014 GMC Sierra All Terrain Edition. I was to use my stock 20" wheels and add 33"x12.50R20 toyo rt tires. What lift would you guys recommend and why? Trying to avoid any rubbing or clearance issues and looking to install level kit myself. Thanks

Edited by Dbotello1983

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hi, New here.  2026 Denali HD.  Just purchased 7/2/26. I am having the same issue.  I just traded in my 2024 AT4, and the truck connected to bluetooth and Android Auto Immediately!  Now, with the new HD, it connects when it wants to, which is usually not at all.  I have to use the usb-c cable to get it to connect.  Bluetooth won't even connect without the AA. Now after saying all that, I'll take a 20 min drive with the phone plugged in.  Stop at a store, restaurant, etc....  Get back in my truck and DO NOT plug the phone in.  The truck then decides at this point, lets connect BT & AA and work perfectly, ie how it should.   I have deleted (forget phone) the phone multiple times.  I guess I'll just get used to plugging it in every time. even though I don't think its good for the phone battery to have it on charge after it hits 100%. I have searched all over.  No one else seemed to be having this issue, until I read this thread today.   thanks for reading.
    • I have an issue with my ignition hanging and I have to tilt the steering wheel to get in the off position. I have used a great key lock spray and it doesn't help resolve the issue. Is this an ignition assembly issue or something else. If anyone has a past experience with this please advise.   Thanks  Heath
    • This is a terrible GM warranty experience, two months waiting for a covered engine swap with no loaner or timeline is not allowed under GM’s courtesy transport policy.Escalate straight past regular support to a GM executive case manager, document every closed service ticket and dealer repair paperwork. File a complaint with NHTSA to force faster action, and ask for daily rental reimbursement while your truck is down. If it’s been out of service over 30 days, your state lemon law may let you pursue a full vehicle buyback.
    • 198°F isn't unusually hot for an 8L90, so I don't think temperature alone caused the issue. Since everything returned to normal after the truck sat for several days, I'd be looking at an intermittent electronic or hydraulic control problem before assuming the transmission itself has failed. The first thing I'd do is scan the Transmission Control Module (TCM), not just the ECM. GM transmissions can store manufacturer-specific or history codes that won't trigger a check engine light. I'd check: TCM history and pending DTCs Commanded vs. actual gear Line pressure Shift solenoid status Torque converter clutch (TCC) slip Transmission fluid temperature If it happens again, try to capture the data before cycling the ignition, since some intermittent faults disappear after a restart. A professional scan tool that supports full GM transmission diagnostics makes this much easier. For example, the Foxwell NT809BT can access the TCM, read manufacturer-specific transmission codes, and display live transmission data that's not available on a basic OBD-II reader: https://www.foxwelldiag.com/products/foxwell-nt809bt Hopefully it's just an intermittent control issue, but I'd definitely pull the TCM data before replacing any parts.
    • Sorry, I accidentally posted in the wrong language. I'll repost it in English.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...