Jump to content

2014+ Leveling Kits

bcazier

By bcazier
in Modifications & Accessories

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

So i put my RC 2" level kit and Toyo 295/55/20's on this weekend. Install was simple, just like on my 2011. It definitely helps to have an extra set of hands when wedging that spacer in there. 295/

Saleenpowr
Saleenpowr

Thanks. Here is one more from yesterday. Considering we're getting 8-10 inches of rain the next two days, I won't be taking any better pics soon.  

FH212
FH212

Mine is finally done! After months of research I went with the RC 2.5" level kit front only, stock rear block. 20"x9" Fuel Nutz w/ +1 offset, 33x12.50x20 Toyo M/T tires. No rubbing, No trimming, yet a

Posted Images

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

Having the zone 2 inch level installed this morning at 10:30. Still undecided on perfect tire size. Won't be off road but want a better stance with no rub problems. So many options here on this thread. 2 inch level up front. Stock block in back. Using my stock 20's I need a tire choice that's gonnagive me more rubber without sticking out the sides. Thoughts?

EDIT: zone 2 inch with G2 285/55/20.

 

No such thing as "perfect size". Just what you like...and sometimes even that changes. Pretty quickly sometimes. If you're not going off-road, stick with a mild A/T type tread or even a street tread. You'll be happier in the long run. They are quieter, ride nice, and generally have less rolling resistance.

baggedlvintegra Enthusiast

baggedlvintegra

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

Shocks like the Kings and Fox may have longer extension than stock. Frankly, I didn't measure my Kings against the OEM Ranchos for full extended free length when they were out of the truck. I installed the Cognito UCAs because I knew that GMT900 trucks needed them with the King shocks and these trucks use the same suspension.

 

Anyone using spacers like the RC kit, might benefit from an aftermarket UCA with the adjusted ball joint angle. I just don't sign up to the idea a dry Teflon socket with a steel ball, exposed to the dirt and elements, is going to last very long. I hear they also develop a squeak.

 

For anyone contemplating an aftermarket UCA, forget about the cheapest one on the market @ $250, the Rough Country UCA. It is designed poorly and interferes with the frame fittings. No amount of grinding on the frame as they recommend, allows for complete factory camber/caster adjustment range.

 

DSC_2686Medium_zpsf64e14e3.jpg

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts. Edited by baggedlvintegra
Aldila Enthusiast

Aldila

Posted
Posted

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts.

Are u still running the rcx 2 inch level?

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted

I completely disagree, I just installed the RCA UCAs and the fit was perfect, no issues with alignment and at a minimum address some of the steep angle and have greaseable/replaceable upper BJs...not bad for the price...and I guess my theory on your issue is these UCAs are specifically spec'd for at least 3.5" of lift. Because you are running less it's not RCX's fault that they didn't spec out for a setup outside their designed use...not being an RCX cheerleader but just want to communicate the facts.

 

 

Well, it really isn't about whether you disagree or not. The fact is it doesn't make them fit my truck.

 

You can see in the picture that the full camber/caster adjustment isn't possible with the RC UCA, even after I ground over 1/2" off my frame, down to the point of the camber/caster indexing cam pin. Regardless of the leveling, the UCA has to travel the same path unimpeded when the suspension compresses. RC just didn't put the small dogleg in the beam like the factory and every other UCA maker selling them for this truck.

 

The facts are that the control arms were represented to me by a RC sales staffer to work with King shocks at 2" level and that full factory range of adjustment is not achievable with the RC UCA.

 

You might want to check your UCAs for rubbing on the frame in this area during full suspension travel.

baggedlvintegra Enthusiast

baggedlvintegra

Posted
Posted

 

 

Well, it really isn't about whether you disagree or not. The fact is it doesn't make them fit my truck.

 

You can see in the picture that the full camber/caster adjustment isn't possible with the RC UCA, even after I ground over 1/2" off my frame, down to the point of the camber/caster indexing cam pin. Regardless of the leveling, the UCA has to travel the same path unimpeded when the suspension compresses. RC just didn't put the small dogleg in the beam like the factory and every other UCA maker selling them for this truck.

 

The facts are that the control arms were represented to me by a RC sales staffer to work with King shocks at 2" level and that full factory range of adjustment is not achievable with the RC UCA.

 

You might want to check your UCAs for rubbing on the frame in this area during full suspension travel.

Yeah I checked my clearance because your pics scared me, to the point I almost didn't order the UCAs, but mine don't have any issues like yours did.

Mike1220 Senior Enthusiast

Mike1220

Posted
Posted

Negative they make a +1,+14, and +20 in the 20x9

I believe it's +14 or 18. Fuel only makes the 20x9 in one offset

never_rested_24-7 is right. They make those sizes and the only difference between the 3 is the amount of backspacing. The lip size is all the same though. About 1.83" or some odd number like that.

Spurshot Senior Enthusiast

Spurshot

Posted
Posted (edited)

Yeah I checked my clearance because your pics scared me, to the point I almost didn't order the UCAs, but mine don't have any issues like yours did.

 

 

Sorry, I shouldn't have jumped down your throat. I just don't like aftermarket parts that don't fit right. One of my pet peeves.

 

In this pic, you can see RC took a direct line to the bushing on that leg of the UCA. The tube cuts across over to the bushing and intersects it at an angle. (the tubes on the outside of the pic)

DSC_2649Large_zps06776ba1.jpg

 

On the Cognito, they put a dog leg in the beam to that side, which goes in to the bushing at a straight approach. (the leg by the logo)

20141119_203132_zpszqpayi1u.jpg

Edited by spurshot
  • Like 1
Dbotello1983 Enthusiast

Dbotello1983

Posted
Posted (edited)

I just bought my 2014 GMC Sierra All Terrain Edition. I was to use my stock 20" wheels and add 33"x12.50R20 toyo rt tires. What lift would you guys recommend and why? Trying to avoid any rubbing or clearance issues and looking to install level kit myself. Thanks

Edited by Dbotello1983

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • GMCustomerService
      Electrical /Immobilizer Data- Battery Voltage (V) Test malfunction

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      Thanks for sharing your concerns with your Silverado and bringing them to our attention. For assistance, please visit: https://s.chevy.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • GMCustomerService
      OBD not ready?

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      We'd like to assist further with your Yukon's concerns. So that we can do so, please visit: https://s.gmc.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • JimCost2014
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By JimCost2014 · Posted

      If what you are doing works, keep doing it:   4LO (Four-Wheel Drive Low) should only be used in extreme low-speed, high-torque situations such as deep mud, heavy snow, steep rock crawling, or extreme inclines/declines, and you must follow the correct engagement procedure to avoid drivetrain damage. Intended Use Cases Deep mud or snow where traction is extremely poor and you need maximum torque to get unstuck Trucks Only+1. Rock crawling on steep, uneven terrain forum.fullsizechevy.com+1. Extreme inclines or declines where you need to control speed and maintain traction solutionsphere.blog. Heavy towing in low-traction conditions (e.g., deep sand, ice) carclubsusa.com.
    • rdonarski
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By rdonarski · Posted

      Hi,   I work a steep boat landing that has patchy blacktop going down the hill and soft sand/gravel at the bottom. Due to low water levels, it's not always possible reach the blacktop. I've had to help several people get out this year already and with fall coming, I'm anticipating more. I always use 4L. There was a gentleman there today with a 2500 HD (actually 2 - him and his son both have them) and they were trying to get his son's wake boat out. This gentleman swears that you should use 4H in the soft gravel. Says he was a farmer and you always use higher gear when stuck. I was wonder what your thoughts on this are? If I'm wrong, it would be good to find out before things get busy.
    • Bill Lemmond
      Roll up bed cover experiences

      By Bill Lemmond · Posted

      Looking for feedback from users of roll up aluminum slat bed covers who have had it for more than 3 years. I prefer the aluminum slat style over supported vinyl covers due to security and the capacity to support a light load. The slight loss of bed opening when rolled up is not an issue. Presently have BAK Revolver the "industrial grade vinyl overlay" on mine is shrinking & coming loose at the rear and on both sides in addition to cracking at some of the folding joints. Truck lives outdoors in NC latitude. Can't justify the steep price to replace it with another one if that's the expected lifespan. Do you have a better alternative?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...