Jump to content

Choice of rear axle ratio would you pick?


coachrider

Recommended Posts

Posted

I put a bed cover on my truck, I can do everything even get groceries and haul ass or whatever.

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I personally have the 3.42 gears in my '06 and I've been pretty happy with them. I know there is a world of difference between my generation and the '14s but I'd still have nothing higher (numerically lower) than 3.42's. If I could get 3.73's I would.

Posted

Great comebacks that made my day. tks I will still stick up for the 308s. They do a fine job pulling my 21foot bass boat.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I'm happy to hear the 3.08 is still good for towing, I have the 5.3L and 3.08 and was really worried about it after reading some things on here. I'm happy with it though, I'm in Canada and on a recent 300km trip I got 9.0L/100km! Thats insane, i put it in the calculator on google and it works out to 31.38mpg!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have 3.42's with a 6" lift and 35x12.50x22's and its slower out of the hole but I average about 16 City/HWY mix

 

I do have an Intake / Exhaust / Dyno tune. (the tune made the biggest difference because of shift points and torque management going bye bye for the most part... The 3.42's and 35's make for some sloppy shifting stock.. (wrong rpms either winding out or lugging never in the sweet spot) #ChucksTuningServices in Houston.

  • 10 months later...
Posted

I hate to dig up a 1 year old topic but I have been skimming over this and it is interesting. I got rid of my 2014 Double Cab 4.3 with 3.23,s and got a 2015 Crew Cab 5.3 with 3.08's. The funny thing is the dealer really wanted to move the truck because of the gear ratio and the fact a lot of people did not want it. I got it for the same price as the 2014.

 

I just can not tell any difference in the RPM's and with the V8 it is a strong truck. I was beside a diesel that was showing off and "rolling coal" from red light to red light so at the next light I decided to floor it and we were dead even. I have not towed my boat yet but I have put my truck in M5 at the speed I tow (65) and it is turning 2,000 RPM's. That seems like a sweet spot for the engine. I am getting a hand calculated 19.9 with mixed city driving and I love it. I do not mind the 3.08 for my use.

Posted

My last two trucks had 4.10 gears (4 speed trans) and when I was shopping around for a truck the 3.42 ratio is what one of the negatives for chevy. Most of the 8 speed rams I looked at had 3.92 gears and Fords were all over the place but for the 5.0 v8 a 3.55 or 3.7 something were pretty common. Of course I bought the chevy or I woudn't be on this site. I don't tow much but I have found over the years that a low gear ratio when driving in hilly terrain is just as effecient as a higher geared truck.

Posted

3.73 is about as steep as I would want to go on this 8 speed.

Posted

My last two trucks had 4.10 gears (4 speed trans) and when I was shopping around for a truck the 3.42 ratio is what one of the negatives for chevy. Most of the 8 speed rams I looked at had 3.92 gears and Fords were all over the place but for the 5.0 v8 a 3.55 or 3.7 something were pretty common. Of course I bought the chevy or I woudn't be on this site. I don't tow much but I have found over the years that a low gear ratio when driving in hilly terrain is just as effecient as a higher geared truck.

 

In the previous gens, the 4.10 gears were more of a necessity because a) the tranny was four speed and not six and b) the motors produced a fair amount less torque than the current gens.

 

Most of the "information" comparing the current generation trucks to previous generations is nothing more than anecdotal at best. The final drive number doesn't matter on its own... It matters in combination to what motor it is paired to. The more output your motor has, the lower you can drop your final drive ratio without giving up a ton on pulling abilities.

 

For me, the 3.42 is the right rear end with the 5.3L. There are times when I need to be able to pull anywhere from 6000-9000 lbs behind me with the 18' equipment trailer. I don't do it a lot, but I want the truck to do it well when I need it to. I'm happy with the 17-18MPG combined mileage that I get the rest of the time as a result of the gearing.

Posted

I do understand the differences in the newer DI engines and the older ones as well as the transmission changes but I still think I would have been happier with the 3.73 ratio than the 3.42 I have now.

Posted

Not sure how you guys are doing it with the 3.08's. I thought factory my truck was pretty slow with the 3.42's and towing wasn't all that fun. Now that I'm tuned with an MIT/Corsa Catback the truck is great and has plenty of power and torque available. I just don't think I could do 3.08's and be comfortable towing 4,000+ lbs regularly.

 

I'm debating going up to 3.73's here in the future to close up gear spacing some more.

Posted

I have not towed my boat yet because I am waiting to get to 1,000 miles. It comes in at 5,100 lbs fully loaded so I am hoping it will do ok. I do not worry about Florida but we do plan on moving back to the mountains around N.C. If it does not do that well I may regear the truck. If I have read correctly it is just the gear in the rear differential and having the ECM programmed correct? I wonder if someone here has done so what the cost was and how do it do with MPG and towing performance. These trucks get good mileage anyway and I bought it to pull and not so much as a gas saver.

 

I know recently we took the boat out with a friend and used his 2013 5.7 Tundra. I was not impressed because the motor always wanted to be in the upper RPM's and would not hold a gear that well. I do not think I have ever used so much gas towing a boat. People talk about how well the Tundra tows and for the gas it burns it dang well should

Posted

The Tundra tows very well. If it wasn't holding gear, he wasn't using Tow/Haul mode (it hunts badly in certain situations if you don't). I used to get 16-17 average, 12 with the snowmobile trailer (2000 lbs), and single digits with the equipment trailer in my 2011 Tundra. It's like it has a tapeworm when it comes to gas consumption while towing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
    • "Life is getting back to normal."    I'm driving again and all new joints are operating as expected for this stage of recovery.   My most recent joint replacement still requires a lot of attention but experience has taught me that time will quiet the remaining pain.  I joked with my surgeon that another joint replacement would take my mind off my most recent surgery and he responded by saying the next will be a hip!  There are no plans for another surgery but, unlike me, I don't think he was joking!  I certainly wouldn't refuse further replacement  if required but hope to spend time out of the "post-op"  period.  I can't stress enough that if you have been recommended for total hip, knee or shoulder replacement that you welcome the offer.  Post-op "recovery" may sound daunting and painful, however, this is far better than the insidious erosion of mobility you are currently experiencing.  Imagine what it would feel like to wake up most mornings feeling better and more mobile than you did the previous day!  Prior to my first surgery in June 2025, even getting out of bed was becoming a formidable task.  Since the day after my first surgery, I get out of bed everyday easily and unassisted.  Making the switch to feeling a little better each day rather than a little worse, is hugely motivating!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...