Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The kit will come with enough hose to make the connections as well as a bag containing a number of fittings and stuff you don't need for the install. I think they must package a generic part kit and ship it with all their kits. They don't provide written instructions either, however there is a video listed on the site for an install on a 2014 6.3L engine. If you have a 6.3 in your truck you're good to go. If you have the 5.3L, the non-throttle body connection to the catch can is located over the valve cover on the left side of the motor. Someone posted a very good explanation in this thread of where the connection is for the 5.3L.

One last thing. It appears that RX builds to order (should you choose to buy from them). You might wait 3 weeks before they ship. That's how long I waited. For me it was worth it. I feel the quality of the can and the parts provided are very good. Good luck.

Posted

I've been trying to respond with details to your question, but for some reason the post doesn't go. PM fails too. I'm going to try to send it in multiple small posts:

 

RX does, but it's not obvious when you order the kit. When I ordered mine, they did not list the 2014 Sierra in the drop down. Others suggested picking something similar from the drop down. I believe I picked Camero. Then when you advance to the next page, there is a place where you tell them the exact application. You can also select the color of the can. I selected black as they didn't list Sonoma Red.

 

 

 

Yes this is how I did it except I selected 2015 Tahoe. My comment got cut off though and RX emailed me to verify what I was trying to communicate in the comment section and I specified my exact make, model, and engine. I just did the RX install yesterday and they supplied all of the necessary nuts, bolts, hoses, a zip tie to secure a hose if you need it, and extra barb couplers to help with routing your hose if you need to make any splices or bends in your set up.

Posted

The kit will come with enough hose to make the connections as well as a bag containing a number of fittings and stuff you don't need for the install. I think they must package a generic part kit and ship it with all their kits. They don't provide written instructions either, however there is a video listed on the site for an install on a 2014 6.3L engine. If you have a 6.3 in your truck you're good to go. If you have the 5.3L, the non-throttle body connection to the catch can is located over the valve cover on the left side of the motor. Someone posted a very good explanation in this thread of where the connection is for the 5.3L.

One last thing. It appears that RX builds to order (should you choose to buy from them). You might wait 3 weeks before they ship. That's how long I waited. For me it was worth it. I feel the quality of the can and the parts provided are very good. Good luck.

Thanks again for the detailed info. It helps alot. I will look at their website and hopefully choose one. Do I need the single or dual check valve model?

Posted

Thanks again for the detailed info. It helps alot. I will look at their website and hopefully choose one. Do I need the single or dual check valve model?

 

Single

Posted

Single

Thanks. Also, do you recommend the optional clean side seperator and optional breather fill cap?

Posted

Thanks. Also, do you recommend the optional clean side seperator and optional breather fill cap?

I don't know much about the breather filler cap. For the 5.3L I don't recommend the clean side separator based solely on the fact that my air box and throttle body were completely dry and clean and it only solves the driver side clean line but there is no solution yet for the passenger side. When they come up with something for the passenger side, I may look into getting them both for peace of mind but in my experience it doesn't seem necessary. I just did the RX can by itself.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Normally the breather is for supercharged applications

 

 

Ryan

Posted

I have installed the Norris Oil Catch can on the brake booster. No problems. No vibrations. No issues, just lots of crap being caught,.

Posted

Thanks. Also, do you recommend the optional clean side seperator and optional breather fill cap?

I like the others didn't install the clean side separator. My air box and throttle body were clean too.

Posted

 

Here you go check out post #153: http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/154204-oil-catch-can/page-11

 

The lines you are taking pictures of are the clean side lines of your valve covers. RX makes a clean side separator for the driver's side line (pictured above) but they do not have a solution for the passenger side line (your second photo). According to what I've read on this forum and other internet research, the catch can will catch 99% of the crap going into your intake and caking up on the valves. The clean side separator will help even more, but again there's no solution yet for the passenger side. I installed my RX can yesterday and I checked both of these clean side lines. They had some oil in them but the airbox was pretty much dry and clean and my throttle bottle was spotless. I have the 5.3L V8. If you have the 6.2L V8, your throttle body will have oil on it because the inlet for the PCV system is on top of the throttle body rather than on top of the intake manifold like on the 5.3L engine (see pictures in post #153 I linked to above).

That's a great link. Thanks. It answered my questions.
Posted

Lots of interesting info in here. IMO adding a catch can obviously wont hurt anything but long term I really don't think its all that much benefit. If you search around the internet all these new direct injection motors (foreign and domestic) have this carbon build up and oil blow by, its just the nature of the beast. I think the hype is a bit over blown.

Posted

Lots of interesting info in here. IMO adding a catch can obviously wont hurt anything but long term I really don't think its all that much benefit. If you search around the internet all these new direct injection motors (foreign and domestic) have this carbon build up and oil blow by, its just the nature of the beast. I think the hype is a bit over blown.

For someone who plans to put 100,000+ miles on and doesn't add a catch can, what are possible issues? I'm torn whether to add or not. I didn't even know what a catch can was a week ago. I do like to take every precaution to try and prevent failure.

Posted

Lots of interesting info in here. IMO adding a catch can obviously wont hurt anything but long term I really don't think its all that much benefit. If you search around the internet all these new direct injection motors (foreign and domestic) have this carbon build up and oil blow by, its just the nature of the beast. I think the hype is a bit over blown.

 

Tell that to the ecoboost guys

 

http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2014/12/induction-service-cleaners-can-damage-ford-ecoboost-engines.html

 

Another benefit of a catch can is on forced induction engines the oil mist coats the intercoolers reducing their effectiveness.

 

 

As our trucks are not Fords, nor do they come factory with forced induction, adding a catch can probably does help with engine longevity, but it is equally mental longevity too.

Posted (edited)

 

Tell that to the ecoboost guys

 

 

I'm not denying carbon build up. I'm saying carbon build up isnt that big a deal. It robs power for sure but like I said its part of the package with all these direct injection motors. They have had this issue for 7-8 years. Trust me, I know. Ive had my Audi "carbon cleaned" 3 times in 4 years and it costs about 800$ each time. I consider it cost of ownership. The only way to do it is open the motor up and scrub the valves manually or with a walnut blaster. Catch can does nothing, cleaners do nothing, its been proven over and over and over. Its just now that the domestic companies are starting to use this technology more frequently these debates are starting to come back up again.

 

My Audi at its first carbon cleaning, just for reference:

 

IMAG1136.jpg

 

fotor_1347028987933.jpg

Edited by Flying Tomatoes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yes, I used my multimeter to probe all of the wires at the MAF, both with the sensor connected, sensor disconnected, key on engine off, key on engine running, etc etc etc. I probed all of the wires again at the PCM, at the connectors, etc. All voltages are what they should be according to the service manual/wiring diagrams. All grounds are good, less than 20 millivolts from the battery negative under load. Both at the connector of the MAF, at the PCM connector etc.      I know this throws a pretty big wrench into things, but this truck was acting up before the swap. I don't have very much information, if any on what was causing it, but if you cleared all of the dtcs it would do the same thing where it would crank, fire, then die. And it would do the same thing a dozen or so times, and eventually it would start and run, but the difference is that it would run and actually be drivable. Whereas now if you can drive it at all, it goes into reduced power mode almost immediately, and even then it's not running correctly. When you come to a stop at a light it stumbles down to for 500 RPM before catching itself and returning to the smooth idle. And if you go more than about 50% throttle then it immediately goes back to doing the misfire thing.    Like I said, I know that throws a wrench into things, and unfortunately I was not able to pull any data or anything like that before I did this work, so I don't have much to go on.    I'm trying to not fixate on one particular thing as the cause of the problem, but it seems like all avenues are pointing me towards the PCM. Like I said I have tested the wiring extensively (see above), and during cranking the sensor does produce seemingly legitimate values at least according to my multimeter, but as soon as the engine fires those values quickly descend into gibberish. I've tried it with multiple different known working sensors, I have done literally every test I can think of multiple times on the wiring (probing the signals, probing the pins with the sensors unplugged, probing the pins at the PCM, voltage drop, voltage drop under load, continuity, ohms, and double-checking everything against the wiring diagrams/ proper values in the service data.)    Another thing that pushes me towards a possible PCM failure is, I have noticed in troubleshooting a little bit taking a break and coming back, that when I leave the truck to sit for a while and cool off, it starts and runs smoothly when I first start it up. However once it warms up. It starts having problems. For example, when I went out to the truck this morning after it had been sitting overnight, I was actually able to drive it down the block. And then once I got on the throttle a Little bit after going about a thousand ft, it started misfiring again. I pulled it back into the driveway, shut it down, and started it back up. It idled smoothly. As soon as I touched the throttle it did the misfire thing again. From then on as soon as I started it it would misfire. I shut the truck off and went to go get a coffee and do a bit more research. When I came back out I started the truck up and it immediately went into the smooth idle. After a couple of minutes of playing around with it, it would not idle smoothly anymore. Let it sit a couple of hours, rinse and repeat. This makes me think with temperature change something is going wrong inside the PCM. I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle and I'm thinking of getting a one-day subscription to the ACDelco programming service to try and program that and see if it helps.   Like I said, I'm really trying to not fixate myself on one potential cause, but it seems everything is pointing me towards PCM failure. I would really like to try to confirm that, but unfortunately I don't have an oscilloscope or a signal generator to do the GM service procedure where you feed 5 khz into the signal pin. 
    • Ahh, sorry about that - I got some bad info. Newdude is correct. That's what I get for working 13 hours straight ... on my "vacation", lol.   Should've checked the files I had instead of the internet.   Anyway ... this is GREAT news, since this would've been an absolute friggin nightmare to get working.   I don't think the lack of VVT is causing this - you've got another issue. Wiring, I'm betting.   I'm telling you right now, your computer isn't bad. If it worked before the swap, it's working now. You need to do some more (better) diagnostics and figure out exactly what you're missing. Did you test every wire directly at the MAF? Have 5V reference? Ground? If you're reading ZERO g/s, your Hz isn't much use - it's going to be the wrong value anyway. The MAF is not working, and you need to find out WHY.   I got this off the net, so VERIFY first: Pin A: Black (BLK) wire, Circuit 552, serves as the Sensor Return (Ground).  Pin B: Tan (TAN) wire, Circuit 472, carries the Intake Air Temperature (IAT) signal.  Pin C: Yellow (YEL) wire, Circuit 492, is the primary MAF Sensor Signal output to the PCM. Pin D: Pink (PNK) wire, Circuit 339 or 539, provides Ignition 1 Voltage (Power).  Pin E: Tan/Black wire, Circuit 552 or similar, often associated with the Intake Air Temperature ground or signal return.  Global-A list: https://postimg.cc/KKJnQC85    
    • Correct....the end user can't reach to Realtruck directly like they can if they purchase a Bak, Undercover, etc...  It has to go through a dealer.
    • It is 4wd. shop told me it is the slip yoke. But not sure.
    • No, I did not tune out vvt. From what I read it should still be able to run without it, it'll just lose some torque/power.    I can see how that would make it not run correctly, but why would that cause the faulty MAF readings?   EDIT: I just ran a quick test and checked, and as I expected, the computer sees that the VVT cam phaser solenoid is not present, and throws a code for it, and does not try to change the cam angle at all. Commanded position just remains at zero, 100% of the time. This makes me think that the VVT is most likely not the cause of the problem though if anyone has a different/better explanation, I'm all ears.   UPDATE: I was able to find that my scan tool does indeed support reading the frequency (hz) off of the MAF (I thought it wasn't supported but turns out I just didn't know where to look for it). I noticed that regardless of engine state it always however this Is not what I observed with my multimeter. Like I said before, the MAF seems to put out a normal signal during cranking and then the signal drops to a very erratic reading once the engine is running. It seems from what my scan tool is telling me that the ECM is not recognizing this at all, and just reads 0 Hz 100% of the time. This pushes me towards the the PCM itself is faulty. I I have the PCM out of the 2007 donor vehicle, which I may try to connect and program (it's only ~50 bucks to get the software for a one-time programming)
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...