Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It's a fully boxed frame, not c channels. That's one of the reasons they dip it in wax to properly cost the interior surfaces of the boxed frame.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sorry, I was describing my 2006 Silverado frame. A fully boxed frame is of course stiffer than a C channel frame, but most likely it also is a great contributor to vibration issues. A C channel frame has better ability to flex and to absorb road vibrations.

 

Anyway, here is a frame rust video clip I found:

 

 

 

Edited by pm26
Posted

It's a fully boxed frame, not c channels. That's one of the reasons they dip it in wax to properly cost the interior surfaces of the boxed frame.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They have used wax dipped since at least the GMT800's.

 

Front section has been a hydroformed tube since then as well.

Posted

Sorry, I was describing my 2006 Silverado frame. A fully boxed frame is of course stiffer than a C channel frame, but most likely it also is a great contributor to vibration issues. A C channel frame has better ability to flex and to absorb road vibrations.

 

Anyway, here is a frame rust video clip I found:

 

 

 

 

I never had any vibration issues with my 2007 fully boxed frame and my current 2014 doesn't have any vibration issues other than the tires occasionally depending on the temperature outside. That will go away for good when I replace the tires. The vibration issues people are having with these trucks are related to the drive train and the frame won't change those conditions if something is out of balance or a part is failing the rear differential. I'd rather have a stiffer frame than one that flexes any day of the week.

 

I personally don't have a problem with the wax coating if it's applied correctly. It was never an issue on my 2007. My dad's 2003 suburban barely has any rust on it because Chevy did a better job then of applying the wax and probably used a better product as well. Guys up north with heavily salted winter roads should worry more with their 2014 and up trucks but if you're around the Virginia latitude and south, you should be ok. It will be 20+ years before rust becomes a structural issue in these areas of the country and this truck will be long gone by the 10 year mark if that.

Posted

They have used wax dipped since at least the GMT800's.

 

Front section has been a hydroformed tube since then as well.

 

I think they've been using wax longer than that. Late 80's early 90's maybe? I feel like I read that somewhere I don't know for sure though.

Posted (edited)

The undercoating on my 15 is great, zero rust and the coating is durable...must have been an early build issue?

Edited by black00ta
Posted

So Frustrated!!!

My dealer painted two small patches in rear wheel wells and basically said there was no TSB.

Guess they figured I wouldn't check out the rest of the frame when I had a chance.

Now dealing with GM customer service...basically playing phone tag for a week.

 

I didn't order a rat rod!!!

So far VERY $HITTY service from GM

 

post-128748-0-48977200-1429621659_thumb.jpg

post-128748-0-34262600-1429621672_thumb.jpg

post-128748-0-48977200-1429621659_thumb.jpg

post-128748-0-34262600-1429621672_thumb.jpg

post-128748-0-48977200-1429621659_thumb.jpg

post-128748-0-34262600-1429621672_thumb.jpg

post-128748-0-48977200-1429621659_thumb.jpg

post-128748-0-34262600-1429621672_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

The undercoating on my 15 is great, zero rust and the coating is durable...must have been an early build issue?

 

Most likely. I swear this is the last first edition vehicle I ever buy from any manufacturer. If it hasn't been out for at least a model year or 2, I'm walking away.

  • Like 3
Posted

My 10 month old truck GMC Sierra SLT 2014 frame is rusting fast.

 

Are those holes forming in the frame from the rust?

Posted

My 10 month old truck GMC Sierra SLT 2014 frame is rusting fast.

 

 

 

Are those holes forming in the frame from the rust?

 

Yeah, I would like to know if those are rust holes too. That's really concerning. What part of the frame is this, maybe a picture of it zoomed out.

Posted

I'm guessing over time we will have a recall on our hands similar to toyotas. Most likely there was a flaw in the dipping process and the frame company will have to pay for new frames for our trucks. My 2005 tacoma didnt look as bad as my 1 year old sierra, but it did have a rust hole through the frame near the catalytic converter. Dana Corp. went out of business because of the loss from replacing all the second gen tacoma frames I was told. On the plus side my 10 year old truck got a brand new frame, lower control arms, ball joints, brake lines and hardware out of the deal. It looked like a new truck before I sold it.

Posted (edited)

I have a 2003 Jeep Wrangler that I bought new. It has sat outside every day of it's life. It has 135,000 miles on it. The frame doesn't have a speck of rust on it! And that's after driving it through 13 shitty Pittsburgh winters! The 2013 Avalanche that I just traded with only 15,000 miles on it looked like it was 50 years old. Not just rust on the frame, but all the cables and fasteners and nuts and bolts. I liked that truck and lost a lot of money trading it in but looking under it made me sick. The wax coating on my 2015 Sierra seems different/better. Time will tell.

Edited by steelcity
Posted

I'm guessing over time we will have a recall on our hands similar to toyotas. Most likely there was a flaw in the dipping process and the frame company will have to pay for new frames for our trucks. My 2005 tacoma didnt look as bad as my 1 year old sierra, but it did have a rust hole through the frame near the catalytic converter. Dana Corp. went out of business because of the loss from replacing all the second gen tacoma frames I was told. On the plus side my 10 year old truck got a brand new frame, lower control arms, ball joints, brake lines and hardware out of the deal. It looked like a new truck before I sold it.

 

Unless these trucks start snapping in half like the Toyotas and GM's hand is forced by the government like they did to Toyota, I wouldn't expect much out of GM. They've demonstrated over and over again that they will do their best to get out of issuing a recall for things unless people start dying from it or it's a cheap easy fix like a software update. They've most likely addressed it on later builds as people have pointed out here with their 2015 wax coatings and us early adopters of the 2014's will be left out to dry.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
    • "Life is getting back to normal."    I'm driving again and all new joints are operating as expected for this stage of recovery.   My most recent joint replacement still requires a lot of attention but experience has taught me that time will quiet the remaining pain.  I joked with my surgeon that another joint replacement would take my mind off my most recent surgery and he responded by saying the next will be a hip!  There are no plans for another surgery but, unlike me, I don't think he was joking!  I certainly wouldn't refuse further replacement  if required but hope to spend time out of the "post-op"  period.  I can't stress enough that if you have been recommended for total hip, knee or shoulder replacement that you welcome the offer.  Post-op "recovery" may sound daunting and painful, however, this is far better than the insidious erosion of mobility you are currently experiencing.  Imagine what it would feel like to wake up most mornings feeling better and more mobile than you did the previous day!  Prior to my first surgery in June 2025, even getting out of bed was becoming a formidable task.  Since the day after my first surgery, I get out of bed everyday easily and unassisted.  Making the switch to feeling a little better each day rather than a little worse, is hugely motivating!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...