Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Basically all the crap about corrosion protection the GM is applying is a total bite in the ass for them. I wonder if they have any feeling of complete failure. I mean if you you post it publicly you better prove it, well its a little late for that. So pathetic, isn't it. Appanently they don't know what extensive means! Oh and they state "enhances the trucks appearance" LOL so hard that is hurts. These trucks already look 8 plus years old underneath. What a joke.

  • Like 1
Posted

Does anyone actually believe this?

 

I'm sure some do, I was being sarcastic when I quoted GM's statement. I guess manufactures can claim anything nowadays without worrying about repercussions. I guess the frame rust and undercoat flaking off enhanced the trucks appearance. lol

  • Like 1
Posted

Basically all the crap about corrosion protection the GM is applying is a total bite in the ass for them. I wonder if they have any feeling of complete failure. I mean if you you post it publicly you better prove it, well its a little late for that. So pathetic, isn't it. Appanently they don't know what extensive means! Oh and they state "enhances the trucks appearance" LOL so hard that is hurts. These trucks already look 8 plus years old underneath. What a joke.

 

If you read their advertisement for the upgraded corrosion protection, it only applies to the body and says nothing about the frame. So technically, they're correct in their public posting. Sh!tty, but correct. Only a seasoned GM owner who knows about the wax coated frames would catch that they left this out of their advertisement so to the general public, they get away with it.

Posted (edited)

 

If you read their advertisement for the upgraded corrosion protection, it only applies to the body and says nothing about the frame. So technically, they're correct in their public posting. Sh!tty, but correct. Only a seasoned GM owner who knows about the wax coated frames would catch that they left this out of their advertisement so to the general public, they get away with it.

Is GM technically correct in advertising their trucks as being "like a rock"?

Edited by pm26
Posted (edited)

Is GM technically correct in advertising their trucks as being "like a rock"?

 

They haven't used that slogan since like '99 haha! I guess you could argue they've quietly backed away from their "like a rock" claim over the years.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted

As an original owner, I bought a '87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe Demonstrator model and the undercarriage was sprayed with a Line-X type coating. After 28 years, the coating is still there.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Silverados corrosion protection measures provide superior defense against elements in the environment, whether driving through farm fields, on construction gravel, or down a snow-covered highway, said Mark Yergin, engineering group manager, General Motors Corrosion Engineering and Labs. The new Silverado is our strongest truck yet, affording us the confidence that the truck will continue to meet customers needs throughout its life.

Additional 2014 improvements over previous models include:

All new body structures designed to minimize the potential for corrosion

Improved hem flange sealing on the doors and hood, and additional underbody flange sealing help keep the joints of the truck dry, discouraging deterioration that might occur from moisture

***Extensive and improved chassis corrosion protection that enhances the trucks appearance and lengthens the life of underbody components

Anti-chip protection on the lower body side for extra protection from stones or gravel.http://media.chevrolet.com/media/us/en/chevrolet/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2013/Sep/0905-silverado.html

Edit: the strange thing is, I haven't been able to find this same info about the 2014 Sierra. On GM's media site I could only find it on the Silverado.http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/us/en/2013/Sep/0905-silverado.html

If you read their advertisement for the upgraded corrosion protection, it only applies to the body and says nothing about the frame. So technically, they're correct in their public posting. Sh!tty, but correct. Only a seasoned GM owner who knows about the wax coated frames would catch that they left this out of their advertisement so to the general public, they get away with it.

Haven't we been thru this before, they specifically state "chassis" and guess what, the chassis consists of the frame.

"An example of a chassis is the underpart of a motor vehicle, consisting of the frame (on which the body is mounted)."

Edited by 14LTZZ71
Posted

Haven't we been thru this before, they specifically state "chassis" and guess what, the chassis consists of the frame.

"An example of a chassis is the underpart of a motor vehicle, consisting of the frame (on which the body is mounted)."

 

Have we? Haha sorry I don't remember reading that but I guess it does state it. I thought there was promotional video that showed them spraying the rock-guard and stuff and the frame was never addressed from what I remember. Anyway I don't know how it can be improved it's a worse wax coating than what they used to use.

Posted

Does anyone think this issue from the factory may have stopped after certain build dates?

Build dates 03/14 and up have an additional clear wax sprayed over the black stuff. Its a lot harder and I have 0 issues with rust on mine.
Posted

Build dates 03/14 and up have an additional clear wax sprayed over the black stuff. Its a lot harder and I have 0 issues with rust on mine.

Probably what was suppose to be done at the start of the 2014's but GM figured they would save a few bucks on the early builds.

Posted

My frame is horrible looking, The entire thing is orange colored with surface rust. I have not see any other new vehicle look this bad. Not even my 2005 tacoma that had to have the frame replaced due to rust. I plan on pressure washing it good this summer and getting under there and doing a good job at painting some sort of frame paint on it. I am not a fan of the thick gunky undercoating.

Posted

My truck was an August 2014 Build and I have found that the frame is rusting where there were welds or joints. The flat surface of the frame itself seems to be holding up alright. I know it's just cosmetic and the frames not going to rust through and break but it sure is annoying.

Posted

These frames are made of relatively thin walled C channels with some fully boxed in sections where the stresses are the greatest. Even though the frame is not likely to rust through for a number of years, it should be properly protected from corrosion, including the welds. It is not exactly made of two inch thick plate steel.

Posted (edited)

These frames are made of relatively thin walled C channels with some fully boxed in sections where the stresses are the greatest. Even though the frame is not likely to rust through for a number of years, it should be properly protected from corrosion, including the welds. It is not exactly made of two inch thick plate steel.

It's a fully boxed frame, not c channels. That's one of the reasons they dip it in wax to properly coat the interior surfaces of the boxed frame.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Silverado-Hareek

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 481 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...