Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

truck has changed even more since these pics..

09933D8B-42FE-466D-B4A1-A11DDB992726_zps

733BE73B-BE13-474D-9AE5-8301FF43D38E_zps

6487A681-A5C6-46B0-A274-5DC28F6EA8FB_zps

 

855C9A79-7764-4B5A-8672-CFD027C3A982_zps

That has to have a leveling kit. They don't come level from gm. Looks good. Sorry thought u said didn't have leveling kit. Wrong person. Truck looks good

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by fuse36
Posted

I got tired on the truck spinning at every red light in the rain and getting stuck on flat grass in a 4x4 on the stock Goodyears. I am noow running 275/70r18 BFG KO's. I do not have a front level (my truck sits dead level stock anyway) and I have tried to make the tires rub at full lock by backing over speed bumps and even onto curbs and it will not rub. The truck looks 100% better to me than with the stock strret treads.

Gm trucks don't come stock level. If it's level it has leveling kit

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

2" RC level, 33x12.50x20 atturo, stock rims. no rubbing at all.

Can u post a front pic where I can see how far the tires stick out. Looks good.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Posted

Can u post a front pic where I can see how far the tires stick out. Looks good.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

using Tapatalk

Photo6

Photo7

 

sorry pictures won't turn to the right side even if i rotate

 

looks good antoine08. what's the noise level on those trail blades?

 

if you roll down your windows and turn your radio down then u can hear it not to loud but noticeable. but if your windows or up or your listening to the radio i won't bother you at all i love them. i expected them to be louder so i am really happy

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

Went with the +12 worx beast and Nitto trail grappler 275/70R18. Rough country 2.5in front and 2in rear. Wheel cut all the way I barely rub the mudflap. I think if I didn't have mudflaps it wouldn't touch.

26340F2D-165E-4F3F-AEF7-88D351218B72_zps

 

 

It seems like Trail Grapplers are the biggest looking (or truest) tire in 275/70r18. If I were to go with the exact same tires on a 18x9 +18 offset with a 2" level, think I'd rub? How about 18x9 with -12 offset?

 

Thanks for any help.

Posted

 

It seems like Trail Grapplers are the biggest looking (or truest) tire in 275/70r18. If I were to go with the exact same tires on a 18x9 +18 offset with a 2" level, think I'd rub? How about 18x9 with -12 offset?

 

Thanks for any help.

With the 18mm offset, you should be fine. But the -12mm is likely going to rub. I have a 2" level and I'm running 275/70/18's on stock 24mm offset rims…

Posted (edited)

With the 18mm offset, you should be fine. But the -12mm is likely going to rub. I have a 2" level and I'm running 275/70/18's on stock 24mm offset rims…

Thanks for reply. Those Duratracs look good. I may consider those.

 

Another question guys. I'd appreciate any input. There's a guy on GMFS running 295/70r17 on a 2014 with a 2" level but he didn't state whether he had any rubbing issues. If I were to run a 295/70r17 tire on a 17x8.5, 0mm wheel, does anyone know if I'd have rubbing issues?

 

I believe those wheels would stick out just about 1" more than my stock 18x8.5 z71 wheels with +24mm offset (or am I wrong?).

Edited by 14x4
Posted

Just got my wheel package put on and want some opinions. I think it turned out awesome, just wondering if I should just leave it leveled or go with a 1.5 body lift on top of this. Wheels are Raceline Rampage 20 inch at a 0 offset and stick out just a hair and I got the new Toyo Open Country RT tires 33x12.5x20, tire is awesome. Very quiet and has a very aggressive look to it without going to a MT. Does not rub at all, still room to play, I did have to take my splash guards off as they would rub on those at full lock in reverse, but just slightly. Very happy with the final product. These new Toyo tires I strongly recommend. Just waiting on my tinted tail lights and 3rd brake light now. Opinions please.

  • Like 1
Posted

attachicon.gifIMG_3048.PNGattachicon.gifIMG_3049.PNGattachicon.gifIMG_3050.PNGattachicon.gifIMG_3051.PNG

Looks great as she sits! And really like those tires. I'm looking to get some of those myself but in a 35x12.5x20

  • Like 1
Posted

I got tired on the truck spinning at every red light in the rain and getting stuck on flat grass in a 4x4 on the stock Goodyears. I am noow running 275/70r18 BFG KO's. I do not have a front level (my truck sits dead level stock anyway) and I have tried to make the tires rub at full lock by backing over speed bumps and even onto curbs and it will not rub. The truck looks 100% better to me than with the stock strret treads.

got a pic?

this is the same setup i want to run.

 

i dont want to put a level kit on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,856 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...