Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks everyone for your input. I currently have 3.43 gears in my truck and was looking to get 33 inch tires. Tops maybe 35 inch but I doubt it since I don't want to lift it that high. I will take this into consideration.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks everyone for your input. I currently have 3.43 gears in my truck and was looking to get 33 inch tires. Tops maybe 35 inch but I doubt it since I don't want to lift it that high. I will take this into consideration.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

A lot of GM trucks have been coming with 3.42 gears for over 20 years. I have 3.42's and have 305/55/20 (33x12.2) the taller tires change the gearing to around 3.29, you would need to go back to a 3.56 to get it back to stock rpm, etc... Where most people notice the change is going to a 35" tall tire over stock which drops you even lower, this causes lower rpm at higher speeds, "bogging" the truck, causing it to downshift more than previous. I thing a 35" tire you would offset this with a 3.73 gear, to get back to "stock" 3.42 range performance. You also need to take into consideration more wind resistance, rolling resistance, heavier wheels/tires, so adding more gear, say 4.10 would help more.

Posted

A lot of GM trucks have been coming with 3.42 gears for over 20 years. I have 3.42's and have 305/55/20 (33x12.2) the taller tires change the gearing to around 3.29, you would need to go back to a 3.56 to get it back to stock rpm, etc... Where most people notice the change is going to a 35" tall tire over stock which drops you even lower, this causes lower rpm at higher speeds, "bogging" the truck, causing it to downshift more than previous. I thing a 35" tire you would offset this with a 3.73 gear, to get back to "stock" 3.42 range performance. You also need to take into consideration more wind resistance, rolling resistance, heavier wheels/tires, so adding more gear, say 4.10 would help more.

I disagree. Just installed a 4 inch bds lift with 285/65/20 bfg KO2's. That's a 34.5x11.5 tire. I have 3.08 gears. Yes, the engine runs at slightly lower rpms at higher speeds, but the tranny doesnt shift any more than stock. The main difference is accelerating from zero. I'm getting 18 mpg highway now and was getting 21 mpg stock.post-156672-146032998585_thumb.jpg

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

post-156672-146032998585_thumb.jpg

post-156672-146032998585_thumb.jpg

post-156672-146032998585_thumb.jpg

Posted

I disagree. Just installed a 4 inch bds lift with 285/65/20 bfg KO2's. That's a 34.5x11.5 tire. I have 3.08 gears. Yes, the engine runs at slightly lower rpms at higher speeds, but the tranny doesnt shift any more than stock. The main difference is accelerating from zero. I'm getting 18 mpg highway now and was getting 21 mpg stock. 0330161709-1.jpg

 

Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk

Hmmmm. I have a 4" lift with 305/55/20, and 3.42 gears, highway speeds here are around 80mph, my truck seems to kick down more going over bridges than it did before.

Nice ass truck, btw

Posted
Mine rub pretty bad at full lock on the inside rears. I took the lower valance off too. Fuel Beast 20x10 -18 offset. 305/55 Toyo Open Country AT Xtreme

 

IMG_5462_zpskki5t6zg.jpg

 

So, what's the zip tie/washer/magical mod that everyone keeps talking about. Haven't seen a thread about it.[/quote

 

Does that offset make the tires stick out past the fenders? Here in PA we cant have the tread out past the fender and I dont want to buy flares, thanks

Posted (edited)

2014 Chevy Silverado regular cab long bed WT2 with a 2"level, 17" Pro Comp Xtreme wheels -6 offset with 285/70R17 Mickey Thompson Baja ATZ.

post-156882-0-37577800-1460359452_thumb.jpeg

post-156882-0-37577800-1460359452_thumb.jpeg

post-156882-0-37577800-1460359452_thumb.jpeg

post-156882-0-37577800-1460359452_thumb.jpeg

Edited by thechainsmoker
  • Like 1
Posted

Looks great. I really like that a lot of guys are going 17s and big tires. 22s have no reason on a truck. A "real" truck that is. haha

  • Like 1
Posted
Mine rub pretty bad at full lock on the inside rears. I took the lower valance off too. Fuel Beast 20x10 -18 offset. 305/55 Toyo Open Country AT Xtreme

 

IMG_5462_zpskki5t6zg.jpg

 

So, what's the zip tie/washer/magical mod that everyone keeps talking about. Haven't seen a thread about it.[/quote

 

Does that offset make the tires stick out past the fenders? Here in PA we cant have the tread out past the fender and I dont want to buy flares, thanks

 

Yes, they do stick out.

D78968DB-44C7-4BCF-8721-B2D487103D55_zps

Posted

2.5" RC Leveling Kit and 275/65R20 Goodyear Duratracs. The tires rubbed just slightly on the fender liner, a couple zip ties solved that. Thx Mr. Drag Sledder for the tips.

 

 

IMAG01561_zpsf35deb98.jpg

Did you remove stock rear blocks and add 2" blocks from RC? How often do you tow a trailer and if so, do you notice a difference in truck handling?

Posted

Here you go. Top is before tires, bottom is after.

 

74c98caae1fb35014819f21a6f271a16.jpg

a0e07650608c5a0a9d25441cb6c7368a.jpg

Kerr very nice looking truck. What's the level on it in the front and did you replace the rear block? What's the difference in these tires vs 305 55 20? Thanks

Posted

Did you remove stock rear blocks and add 2" blocks from RC? How often do you tow a trailer and if so, do you notice a difference in truck handling?

 

Yes the stock rear blocks were removed and the 2" blocks from RC went in. I trailer all the time a duck boat and a Ranger fishing boat. My Ranger is a multispecies rig weighing around 5,000lbs and causes the rear to sag. It still tows fine, but you can tell you are riding high in the front. I put in Air Lift 5000 series air bags and run them at 20psi, levels everything out and tows great.

Posted

Kerr very nice looking truck. What's the level on it in the front and did you replace the rear block? What's the difference in these tires vs 305 55 20? Thanks

 

Thanks man.

 

Front 2.5" level and 2.5" block in the rear. 295's are just a tad narrower than the 305's. The difference is minimal and barely noticeable, but enough to prevent me from rubbing. I do still rub, but only at full lock in reverse. The 305's would've probably required trimming.

Posted

 

Thanks man.

 

Front 2.5" level and 2.5" block in the rear. 295's are just a tad narrower than the 305's. The difference is minimal and barely noticeable, but enough to prevent me from rubbing. I do still rub, but only at full lock in reverse. The 305's would've probably required trimming.

The 295's filled the wheel wells in just right.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,762
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Chris80s
    Newest Member
    Chris80s
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 827 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still $3.01 with even more places at this price
    • JW2024 and Others is this site for Oshawa built Trucks as well ? Thank You !
    • Thanks JR that would be great if you could do that !!! Do you have a link to where this was discussed before ? I cant seem to find it  Thank You Again !
    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...