Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

From the OM:

 

Automatic Transmission Fluid (8 Speed Transmission)
When to Check and Change Automatic Transmission Fluid
It is usually not necessary to check the transmission fluid level. The only reason for fluid loss is a
transmission leak or overheated transmission. This vehicle is not equipped with a transmission fluid
level dipstick.
There is a special procedure for checking and changing the transmission fluid in these vehicles. Because this procedure is difficult, this should be done at the dealer. Contact the dealer for additional information or the procedure can be found in the service manual. See Service Publications Ordering Information on page 13-11.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Most new transmissions have a dealer only tool. Even if you get the dipstick, you will need the temp map to tell your where the fluid level should be at what temp.

 

Not that this is a good thing but it is the way they are going...

Posted

If you like having new vehicles, dealers need to make money to keep their doors open

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

The automatic transmission dipstick has been disappearing on a lot of vehicles for many years. I am not surprised it is just starting on the new Chevy Silverado. I know of some vehicles as of 2006 but it could have happen even later than that date. Just like the spare tire on some vehicles.

Edited by PMattras
Posted

My 2009 Cadillac CTS w/6-sp is same, no dipstick.

 

GM is trying to keep the aftermarket business for themselves and they make it difficult for owners to find aftermarket products and to service the vehicles.

Posted

Well one does service their tranny now. Drop pan and add a few quarts. Or you can do full exchange of fluid but really expensive. I did the pan and a few quarts at 30,000 and will again at 70-80,000.

 

If it is leaking you will know. If over heated you should know and be watching temps while towing. Otherwise tranny fluid is not going anywhere and will be in good condition. I do not buy the lifetime or 100,000 miles stuff and service the tranny.

 

Independent shops will have the ability to service the tranny.

Posted

Simple. You drive your truck till the warranty runs out, soon after it breaks , you buy a new one. Kinda like the tires that are made to last forever. You'll never see 'em. They gotta' keep us coming back. This "non serviceable" crap is just the beginning. Ever tried to find the engine in a Porshe Boxter?

Posted

I read that one of the Ferrari models sold in mid 80's (maybe it was Testarossa) required timing belt change every 15k miles. And to change the timing belt, the entire engine had to be pulled out of the vehicle becuase there was no other way to do it. How is that for DIY maintenance?

Posted (edited)

I read that one of the Ferrari models sold in mid 80's (maybe it was Testarossa) required timing belt change every 15k miles. And to change the timing belt, the entire engine had to be pulled out of the vehicle becuase there was no other way to do it. How is that for DIY maintenance?

 

Well, I'd call a Ferrari kind of an exotic car. Not a bread and butter car all of us drive.

Ok it doesn't mean that the Ferrari has to be a bitch to work on just because of that.

 

But if I was a farmer and had to rely on my equipment (like the truck who takes me to the field e.g.) and couldn't perform routine maintenance...I wouldn't like it.

Do I have to crawl under the truck to check for leaks every morning? It's easier to check with a stick IMO.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

Edited by j-ten-ner
  • Like 1
Posted

The Jeep and Challenger are this way, no transmission dipstick. So I bought the service dipstick, checked both when they were new and recorded the readings which corresponded to the chart I had. Some people have gotten around the problem by purchasing a long zip tie and using it as a service dipstick.

 

I don't like it but what are you going to do?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,769 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...