Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had to drill holes in my dust cap for the wires of my led kit..... I wonder if the dealer will warranty them.... I feel like an idiot lol..... for the record I tried blowing a shop vac in the headlight with the bulb removed to dry it out, the drops didn't even budge, I then tried 2 silica packs and that hasn't helped at all..

 

Are these headlights actually vented?... Or are the fogging headlights not vented and should be?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Ok. i am a little confused because this sounds like basic science to me. I have double pane, argon filled windows in my house. When the temp outside is below 32F and the furnace is on, my window on the inside condensates. Isn't this a reaction of a cold window meeting warm air? For guys with HID or regular halogens, the inside of the light gets hot from the output of the bulb so the inside of the light housing is now warmer than the air outside the housing. When you park the vehicle, the outside temp cools the warm air inside and creates a foggy appearance. I'm an electrician not a scientist but this seems to be how warm and cool air mixing tends to work.

 

From Ricart website

 

Getting water or condensation buildup inside of your headlights can be a very common occurrence and could happen for a number of reasons. As you drive with your lights on, the bulbs continue to heat up. Once you stop, the cooler, moister air outside can trickle into the housings of the headlamp. The housings, on most cars, are vented at the top and bottom to allow for pressure differences that keep your bulbs and lamps from cracking and failing. When the lens of the headlight is cooler than the air inside the housing, droplets of moisture will condense inside, leaving you with water on the lens. When the outside temperature rises, the moisture usually evaporates.

Posted

Didn't feel like reading all 14 pages to see if someone has mentioned this or not, but I read awhile back that some guys put dehumidifying packs into their headlight housings to see if it would clear up the condensation and they said it worked. They just changed them out whenever they thought it needed to.

 

I was also thinking anti fog strips, like what go pro uses for their camera housing, may work. Haven't tried it out though since my condensation isn't bad at all and it only comes up sometimes. Probably cause its winter right now.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

same issue on my 2015 silverado after washing it tonight i had moisture in both headlights and rear cab brake light didnt notice any in the taillights

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have a 2016 GMC Canyon and have condensation in the headlights and tail lights, I've spoke to the dealer twice about this and they brush me off saying that there is nothing they can do, it's normal. So I called GMC and spoke with someone, they informed me that they will be looking into this farther for me and contact me back within 48 hrs. Circle gmc in highland Indiana keeps brushing me off. I've bought 6 of my last 8 vehicles from them, but no more

Posted

I have a 2016 GMC Canyon and have condensation in the headlights and tail lights, I've spoke to the dealer twice about this and they brush me off saying that there is nothing they can do, it's normal. So I called GMC and spoke with someone, they informed me that they will be looking into this farther for me and contact me back within 48 hrs. Circle gmc in highland Indiana keeps brushing me off. I've bought 6 of my last 8 vehicles from them, but no more

Loyality means nothing to GM and the dealers. They rehearse the reasons our trucks don't work right. Blowed me off on my radio reception issues .Nothing they can do. Working as designed.SAD
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Anyone have any news yet or ideas to fix the issue? It seems like every storm or good wash that the truck goes through, the condensation gets worse and leaves watermarks on the inside high beam lense... very irritating.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Noticed moisture inside my driver's side headlight recently after a wash job. Just a garden hose, no high pressure wash. I knew about the issue with the earlier K2's but i guess it's still a problem. Not impressed at all with GM again. Brand new truck with mounting issues...seems like a repeat of my last one.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

My truck is a 15' but I purchased it new 7 weeks ago. Have 1400 miles on it now but my passenger side has condensation in it. These headlights are vented, it's in a TSB from GMC

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I had this issue when I first got my 2016 All Terrain. I had contamination in the drivers side headlight lens and a deep scratch in the passenger side headlight lens. I used to work at the dealer, last day was yesterday, and they changed them for me on warranty. The all terrain lights are expensive though! I checked my cars history the other day and pulled the warranty card of the system, the headlight cost to our dealer was $1657 per light! The total value of the warranty claim including labour was $4,000!!

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I had condensation in both headlights of my 2014 GMC Sierra. Would really show during rainstorms or car washes.

 

I put a dry silica pack in each headlight, under my HID bulbs.This cleared my headlights right up. They have been clear for about 8k miles. I did recharge them once (take the silica packs out and put them in the oven at 280 for a couple hours).

 

These are the biggest packs that I could fit through the access hole. The fit is tight, but they will slide in and sit just below the bulb. Put a little 3M tape on the bottom to make them stay put in the headlight housing.

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B006L882NM/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

(You need to purchase 2 of the above or something similar)

 

Hope this works for you guys.

Edited by dbrohrer
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Well like others, I had condensation the first week I bought my truck in 12/15. The condensation would come and go randomly but for the most part, would be very limited. After I installed my HID kit, it was building up quite a bit. I am planning on trying to get my lights warrantied through the dealer we use at my work but I am hoping I don't have to return everything to stock before taking it in. The service advisor noted that there is a bulletin out about this issue and that she would show the pictures to the service manager to see what they can do about it. Ideally, I would like to be able to take my headlights in and just do it myself so I can do my FXR kit while it is out. We will see what she comes up with and tells me tomorrow.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

i have the same problem... only driver side headlight. I am afraid that they will give me a hard time because I have HIDS but this is pissing me off...

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I had condensation in both headlights of my 2014 GMC Sierra. Would really show during rainstorms or car washes.

 

I put a dry silica pack in each headlight, under my HID bulbs.This cleared my headlights right up. They have been clear for about 8k miles. I did recharge them once (take the silica packs out and put them in the oven at 280 for a couple hours).

 

These are the biggest packs that I could fit through the access hole. The fit is tight, but they will slide in and sit just below the bulb. Put a little 3M tape on the bottom to make them stay put in the headlight housing.

 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B006L882NM/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

(You need to purchase 2 of the above or something similar)

 

Hope this works for you guys.

How has this been going for you? working well? Let me know because I am all out of ideas as well and willing to try this.

 

thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...