Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You should drive the Tundra TRD PRO and feel how that suspension feels. I think the Bilsten 6112s would be well worth the wait.

Never seen a TRD Pro in person to drive, they seem to be rare, the fact that they are more money and less truck would make it a hard sell although they are cool trucks.

Posted

We will start taking pre-orders when the part numbers are released and pricing and release date are confirmed.

I am in.

Posted

I've searched but haven't been able to find the answer. How much different does rear shock valving need to be for Max Tow rears vs standard? If I wait for the 6112 for front would the 5160 be the correct rear shock for Max Tow application? Thanks

Posted

I've searched but haven't been able to find the answer. How much different does rear shock valving need to be for Max Tow rears vs standard? If I wait for the 6112 for front would the 5160 be the correct rear shock for Max Tow application? Thanks

I don't know, but the odds are, the 5160 will far surpass the stock shocks in every way, including load handling ability, so I wouldn't worry

Posted

I'm in as well, though if it's more than 6 months I'll go with fox. Keep us posted...As an aside, any installed pics/videos would be neat to see if you're allowed by bilstein

Posted

I'm in as well, though if it's more than 6 months I'll go with fox. Keep us posted...As an aside, any installed pics/videos would be neat to see if you're allowed by bilstein

 

So much this! I can figure it out myself but its nice to know what to expect.

Posted

I don't know, but the odds are, the 5160 will far surpass the stock shocks in every way, including load handling ability, so I wouldn't worry

I was guessing that would be the case too. Given the number of NHT drivers on here, I'm surprised I can't find a more definitive answer. thanks though.
Posted

Does anyone know where to get the 6112 version. I can't seem to find them or a part number for them anywhere

 

Not released yet, still in development. Think April was last I saw on here. 5100's are your best bet for now or another brand.

Posted

I've searched but haven't been able to find the answer. How much different does rear shock valving need to be for Max Tow rears vs standard? If I wait for the 6112 for front would the 5160 be the correct rear shock for Max Tow application? Thanks

No difference.

Posted

Does anyone know where to get the 6112 version. I can't seem to find them or a part number for them anywhere

 

 

Chris, good to see you on GM-Trucks now. Did you sell your Tacoma? Like the Tacoma, FJ, 4Runner & Tundra - Total Automotive Performance will be the best source for your 6112 needs.

 

April is the tentative release date.

Posted (edited)

Yeah I sadly sold it. A lot time and money but had to have more room for the kiddos and misses. Already heating up the credit card a bit with the new truck. This forum is got a lot of info for sure. A little hard to follow and post pics but otherwise good.

 

I will say I'm enjoying some of the perks the Sierra comes with that we're not even close to an option for the Tacoma. Got the new Method 306s in black, and taking off these 20" for some 17s bf699ef6258c1c8dda9c9a9dfbd75344.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Edited by Csjumper2003
  • Like 1
Posted

I recently had 5100's installed on the front of my truck. Went with max height setting and gained almost exactly 2" on both corners. Gonna be installing the rear 5100's in the spring. People say they ride stiffer than factory on max height setting but I find they are softer and make the truck feel planted better when going over rough pavement.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?
    • Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...