Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Same here. Label off, Boot up.
I drove around a while with them Boot down and no difference in ride or handling.
Boot up looks better and makes more sense.



My 2500 DMAX CC Bilsteins boots up
02c8546e81b4079844cd7b398bcd753c.png

My 1500 6.2 CC boots down
3f03705b12beaa51ad929822a55097a9.png



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Sooperdave said:

I don't think it really matters but I installed mine just like factory... boot on top.  I actually removed the label and flipped it so it reads correctly.  

 

5 hours ago, Sierra Dan said:

Same here. Label off, Boot up.

I drove around a while with them Boot down and no difference in ride or handling.

Boot up looks better and makes more sense.

 

46 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

 

 


My 2500 DMAX CC Bilsteins boots up
02c8546e81b4079844cd7b398bcd753c.png

My 1500 6.2 CC boots down
3f03705b12beaa51ad929822a55097a9.png



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

I did a little more research asking around to different mechanics.  Generally, the consensus is that the Bilstein logo should go up and that's how you know the orientation of the shocks.  From a performance standpoint, it doesn't seem to matter which direction the shocks are orientated...they should still perform the same.  The reason the boot goes down on the 5100's is because it keeps dirt and debris from settling around the joint/seam where the piston enters the main shock body.  Also the boot is more resilient against rocks/debris/etc. so in theory the shock should last longer since the main metal housing around the critical part of the shock isn't getting damaged.  My Ranchos were all rusted and the paint was missing at the bottom so this theory makes sense given what I experienced with the Rancho's.  In other words it's more of an "off road" orientation to have the boot down.  But performance-wise, it really shouldn't matter...the dampening effects are the same.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted
I did a little more research asking around to different mechanics.  Generally, the consensus is that the Bilstein logo should go up and that's how you know the orientation of the shocks.  From a performance standpoint, it doesn't seem to matter which direction the shocks are orientated...they should still perform the same.  The reason the boot goes down on the 5100's is because it keeps dirt and debris from settling around the joint/seam where the piston enters the main shock body.  Also the boot is more resilient against rocks/debris/etc. so in theory the shock should last longer since the main metal housing around the critical part of the shock isn't getting damaged.  My Ranchos were all rusted and the paint was missing at the bottom so this theory makes sense given what I experienced with the Rancho's.  In other words it's more of an "off road" orientation to have the boot down.  But performance-wise, it really shouldn't matter...the dampening effects are the same.


After speaking with GM of 4wheelparts, the geometry of the shock requires install to be right side up for the Bilstein label. I had install as per instructions from Bilstein and drive great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
1 hour ago, TXGREEK said:

 


After speaking with GM of 4wheelparts, the geometry of the shock requires install to be right side up for the Bilstein label. I had install as per instructions from Bilstein and drive great!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

The front shocks only install in one direction obviously.  And at least on mine, their labels were right side up.  

 

The rear shocks though physically can be installed in either direction because of how the truck is designed to receive the rear shocks and how the rear shocks are designed....the mounting components (I don't know the technical term of the part that the bolt passes through at the end of the shock) of the shock are oriented in the same direction which allows you to flip the shock either way.  Whether you should install them in either direction is another matter and that's where people seem to get confused and ask the question.  Unfortunately there's conflicting information out there but generally, the most consistent answer I've seen is that the label should be facing up.  Bilstein isn't the only shock on the market either that has a boot-down design for some of their shocks so it is something that's done often.

Posted (edited)

As promised, here's a before and after of the finished product:

 

truck%20level%20and%20tires_zpsmjvjp5ix.

 

Ignore the crappy "photoshopping" around the truck.  I was trying to hide/cut out other vehicles and items to protect others' privacy.  As  for the truck, I have the 5100's set to the 2nd highest setting (1 down from the highest setting).  The tires are 275/70/R18's.  I was worried about how the load range E tires would feel on the road, but the truck drives great.  And I can't explain why or how, but my steering loosened back up after these tires went on and the popping noise when steering issue went away.  The only explanation I have is that the noise and tightness had something to do with the angle of the tierods and the new tires adjusted that angle just enough to make a difference.  In theory I wouldn't think the tires could have an effect on the angle given this set up, but I don't know how else to explain it.  Overall though I'm thrilled with how the truck looks now and how it drives.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
  • Like 3
Posted
On 7/13/2018 at 9:56 AM, JamesAT18 said:

Just to confirm, for 2017+ there doesn't need UCA replacement to install Bilstiens. Correct? 

 

Correct, the 5100's are designed to work with all of your other stock components.

  • Like 1
Posted
The front shocks only install in one direction obviously.  And at least on mine, their labels were right side up.  
 
The rear shocks though physically can be installed in either direction because of how the truck is designed to receive the rear shocks and how the rear shocks are designed....the mounting components (I don't know the technical term of the part that the bolt passes through at the end of the shock) of the shock are oriented in the same direction which allows you to flip the shock either way.  Whether you should install them in either direction is another matter and that's where people seem to get confused and ask the question.  Unfortunately there's conflicting information out there but generally, the most consistent answer I've seen is that the label should be facing up.  Bilstein isn't the only shock on the market either that has a boot-down design for some of their shocks so it is something that's done often.


My brothers Fox 2.0 shocks don’t have boots just bare chrome piston shaft aiming downward (just like the Bilsteins) which is weird considering it’s an off-road shock with nothing to protect it from debris.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I made my own conclusion. I flipped the label and ran in the orientation as the OE shocks.  If you look at most OE shock/strut bodies, the boots are typically on top.  With this particular boot and type of shock it really shouldn't matter.  This boot is sealed at both ends to protect from elements.  I think it looks better with it up as well.  

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Sooperdave said:

I made my own conclusion. I flipped the label and ran in the orientation as the OE shocks.  If you look at most OE shock/strut bodies, the boots are typically on top.  With this particular boot and type of shock it really shouldn't matter.  This boot is sealed at both ends to protect from elements.  I think it looks better with it up as well.  

Yeah I don’t think it really matters from a performance standpoint in my opinion. It’s a cosmetic choice. But the boot isn’t perfectly sealed. If you look it has drainage holes so it can breathe and drain. Just an FYI. 

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
Posted

Been running my Bilstein 5100's for over a year now and I have been very happy with them. Recently up graded to LT275 60R20 Yokohama Geolandar AT G015 tires. Little over an inch rake, but I think the stance is prefect. 

IMG_20180722_133146.jpg

IMG_20180722_133226.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/20/2018 at 10:34 PM, Silverado-Hareek said:

As promised, here's a before and after of the finished product:

 

truck%20level%20and%20tires_zpsmjvjp5ix.

 

Ignore the crappy "photoshopping" around the truck.  I was trying to hide/cut out other vehicles and items to protect others' privacy.  As  for the truck, I have the 5100's set to the 2nd highest setting (1 down from the highest setting).  The tires are 275/70/R18's.  I was worried about how the load range E tires would feel on the road, but the truck drives great.  And I can't explain why or how, but my steering loosened back up after these tires went on and the popping noise when steering issue went away.  The only explanation I have is that the noise and tightness had something to do with the angle of the tierods and the new tires adjusted that angle just enough to make a difference.  In theory I wouldn't think the tires could have an effect on the angle given this set up, but I don't know how else to explain it.  Overall though I'm thrilled with how the truck looks now and how it drives.

Looks great! I plan the same thing for mine. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, 8086BRUCE said:

Looks great! I plan the same thing for mine. 

Thanks man.  Nice you will love it!  It's hard to tell in the 2nd photo but I was trying to maintain some of the forward rake because I still plan to haul and tow some with this truck.  But after the level and tires I raised the front almost 3 inches (tires plus leveling shocks) and the rear about 1 inch (from the tires only).

Posted
1 minute ago, Silverado-Hareek said:

Thanks man.  Nice you will love it!  It's hard to tell in the 2nd photo but I was trying to maintain some of the forward rake because I still plan to haul and tow some with this truck.  But after the level and tires I raised the front almost 3 inches (tires plus leveling shocks) and the rear about 1 inch (from the tires only).

That's exactly what I'm looking for. I still need rake for hauling the boat ect.

Posted
23 minutes ago, 8086BRUCE said:

That's exactly what I'm looking for. I still need rake for hauling the boat ect.

I think I have about 1” of fall from rear to front now.  Before the level it was about 3 inches

Posted
38 minutes ago, Silverado-Hareek said:

I think I have about 1” of fall from rear to front now.  Before the level it was about 3 inches

Thanks much for the info. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.
    • I forgot to answer the question as per what market mine is set to and yes I finally found that area on mine and yes its also set to America.   So here's something I realized as I wasn't looking at that part in the Sierra section until now, your right that what I see here as choice 3 under Sierra which says 07/2023-06/2026 ( 433 MHz 13542523 ) it has no choice 5 for tire pressure selection. Where as it does under the Chev choice. However I kept going down the list within the Sierra and I am really wondering if choice 9 will work for your truck as it has the same model number and hertz sensor as my truck. I would say try that choice first, if that doesn't work then jump over to the Chev section and again choose that same model and hertz choice as for some reason the Chev section gives the choice 5 of tire type/pressure selection for going back a number of years. Could very well be an Autel thing that they just didn't get the updates all done properly under Sierra but anyway first try that selection 9 I suggested under Sierra and then go from there. 
    • Looking for this piece that holds the hose clamp in place. I have the hose clamp just not that other piece. Dealers and wrecking yards in my area will not sell just that piece. They want you to buy the whole air tube $100 +/- to get that $5 part.  that piece isn't molded to the air tube as I looked at my friends truck. It's held on by a screw and nut. I'm trying to put the OEM parts on the truck as the previous owner butchered things up installing an aftermarket CAI. It really looked homemade. 🤣 Thanks
    • Ok I missed that part that yours is a GM. The strange part is that the choice for year ranges and within the year of 2026 is different on the Sierra then on the Chev for some reason as I am looking at my tool at the Sierra choices. Now I am guessing you see as to your sensor part number as it may be different on your truck for some reason and a call to GM should get you the part model number of the sensors you should have as well as which MHz your sensors are. I know mine are the ones as per what I listed but there are other choices in the Autel and got me wondering if by some chance they put different ones in your truck. Having said that, did you try using each of the choices starting from No 1 and going on down the list, not sure if that would mean shutting off the engine each time and resetting the tool and going at it again each time. Also I thought of something else which may sound retarded but if there was some stupid chance that the chev choice would work. The reason I say that is that the Sierra is showing a range up to 06/2026 for the various choices of sensors it could be where as the Chev has one choice that has that 12/2026. By the way it is possible to not run the truck and you may know that as per not pressing the brake but pressing and holding the start button for a few seconds and it lights up the dash ( its called service mode ) but that sucks battery power and if it were me doing it that way I would be throwing on a decent sized battery charger before doing it that way as killing your battery won't make you happy at me at all !.    Like I say, just a thought to try the Chev choices if you have already exhausted the Sierra choices but first it would be nice to know for sure what exact sensor model and hertz your truck uses as I assume only those choices that mention the sensor would work unless a choice that does not mention the sensor model would somehow work. Its frustrating when one is trying to use tools like this without the experience of the tool and the vehicle, as I am sure dealer techs themselves struggle with it when starting out or a new model year comes along that is slightly different. 
    • I tried before I updated the scan tool just incase an update messed it up, but it never worked so I updated the scan tool and it still didn't work.   Only difference is I click on Sierra not Chevrolet cause I have a Sierra.   If I click on 2026-2024 I didn't have any option to change placard, when I click on 2023 it does give me the option but when I try to do it,.it says vehicle not supported!   I have my region or market or whatever it is set to America I think, is that what yours is set to?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...