Jump to content

  

824 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wanted a Blue Truck. I really liked the 16 but red was not my color. Upgrade cost was negligible (sold old truck myself for a good price and got an awesome deal on the new one at Laura over 13k off sticker)

 

 

Hmm, well, I do see an angle I might be able to work; my truck is Tungsten Metallic I believe it is. Anyway, my wife thinks the color is dull and boring. Sooo, I might just suggest a new truck with a brighter color of paint that has more flash-bang, lol! Just might work! I'm thinking that I will wait till the 2019 model is available though as GM has fallen a little behind in the goodie race with Ford.

Posted

Interesting but 141 people as of today are not completely happy with their transmission. Either sometimes hate it or always hate it.... thats really not bad considering how many they made probably in the 10000's, right??

Posted

My 8 spd has started torque converter shuttering. I am beyond disappointed in this truck. 7,500 miles on it and transmission clunks and shutters, leaf springs squeak like a late model F150, some unfindable rattle in front end, and stereo freezes. 2016 yr model All Terrain.

 

It was really nice before all of the aforementioned issues. Really considering trading. What sends me over the edge is the Amp steps I installed, Kicker sub, DVD headrest monitors...All things that I have to either let go at no value, or remove and try to sell.

 

I have made numerous trips to 2 dealers with yet a decent resolve. Software update for trans and stereo. Grease on springs. Couldn't replicate rattle...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Those addons have little to no value when doing a tradein at a dealer (they are raping you regardless) but to a private party buyer they can add value. I would get this thing cleaned up and advertise away and see what happens. What are you skeered of?

Posted

Interesting but 141 people as of today are not completely happy with their transmission. Either sometimes hate it or always hate it.... thats really not bad considering how many they made probably in the 10000's, right??

--------------

That's not how sampling works; your universe is the number of participants in the poll not the number of Silverados sold. The guy who created the poll (Jacob?) has it calculating results correctly. So, just check out his percentages and you will have your answers. But, keep in mind that even though this poll is accurate to the extent of the responses reflected it's not completely objective. But, it's interesting nonetheless. So, accept it for what it is :)

Posted

--------------

That's not how sampling works; your universe is the number of participants in the poll not the number of Silverados sold. The guy who created the poll (Jacob?) has it calculating results correctly. So, just check out his percentages and you will have your answers. But, keep in mind that even though this poll is accurate to the extent of the responses reflected it's not completely objective. But, it's interesting nonetheless. So, accept it for what it is :)

-----------

Ok, gonna correct my own error and thereby steal the satisfaction from any trolls lurking out there. The universe is the number of eight speed tranny's sold to date. The sample size is the sum of the participants. If the sample/poll is constructed objectively the results will accurately reflect the content in the universe. There, I feel better now :)

Posted

--------------

That's not how sampling works; your universe is the number of participants in the poll not the number of Silverados sold. The guy who created the poll (Jacob?) has it calculating results correctly. So, just check out his percentages and you will have your answers. But, keep in mind that even though this poll is accurate to the extent of the responses reflected it's not completely objective. But, it's interesting nonetheless. So, accept it for what it is :)

I am going to go ahead (since I made the poll) and ask. How exactly do I have any control over how anything is calculated? I made a poll, the website handles any calculations.

Posted

I am going to go ahead (since I made the poll) and ask. How exactly do I have any control over how anything is calculated? I made a poll, the website handles any calculations.

Ok, my bad. I assumed that you wrote the algorithm that calculates the results shown at the right of each category. My comment was meant as a compliment :)

Posted (edited)

And I could have added "141 respondents to the poll" are dissatisfied to avoid some misinterpretation. Rather than implying only 141 worldwide customers are dissatisfied.

 

While this poll only represents the opinions of those responding to it, I feel there is a small chance or 'skew' that some non-forum (in general) users who are dissatisfied with their transmission are more likely to search online to find other users with similar problems, find this thread and post about it rather than say, a similar non-forum user who is satisfied with his truck. It's just business as usual for him?

Edited by JB Z71
Posted

Ok, my bad. I assumed that you wrote the algorithm that calculates the results shown at the right of each category. My comment was meant as a compliment :)

Way too much credit! lol.

Posted (edited)

And I could have added "141 respondents to the poll" are dissatisfied to avoid some misinterpretation. Rather than implying only 141 worldwide customers are dissatisfied.

 

While this poll only represents the opinions of those responding to it, I feel there is a small chance or 'skew' that some non-forum (in general) users who are dissatisfied with their transmission are more likely to search online to find other users with similar problems, find this thread and post about it rather than say, a similar non-forum user who is satisfied with his truck. It's just business as usual for him?

 

I would like to say I have a good relationship with my dealer. The general sales manager (who helped me get trade assistance on my truck) purchased a new Sierra Denali with the 6.2L. He said his clunks on the downshift and he knew it going into it due to all the trucks with the 6.2L and 8 speed including the Escalades, Denali Yukons etc have had complaints in their service department.

Edited by JacobC1983
Posted

As the title states.... My 2015 GMC Sierra with the 6.2L and 8 Speed is at the dealership again with a field service engineer hoping to fix the transmission for the 5th try.

 

I will trade it in on another GMC Sierra.. and I want the 6.2L again. As you know, this sticks you with the 8 Speed transmission.

 

So.... Who has a trouble free 8 speed transmission? I have read many threads of problems, but hope to find those without problems to make the final decision: Do I get the 8 speed again in the 2016 model or do I downgrade to the 5.3L and the 6 Speed.

 

 

Please put in miles and year of your vehicle with any explanation you want in the thread.Moring

Morning, working for a dealership, I try to remain as unbiased as possible. So far this year our #1 selling vehicle is the Sierra with 6.2 and an 8-speed

transmission, sign the recall and new programming that was issued, complaints no issues.

Posted

What

 

Morning, working for a dealership, I try to remain as unbiased as possible. So far this year our #1 selling vehicle is the Sierra with 6.2 and an 8-speed

transmission, sign the recall and new programming that was issued, complaints no issues.

What recall and new programming?

 

Is it really a recall or just a TSB ?

Posted

Morning, working for a dealership, I try to remain as unbiased as possible. So far this year our #1 selling vehicle is the Sierra with 6.2 and an 8-speed

transmission, sign the recall and new programming that was issued, complaints no issues.

 

I have a hard time believing the number 1 selling vehicle at a dealership is the sierra 6.2 8 speed combo. I realize GMC has limited models compared with a Chevy dealer, but still struggle with your statement, In particular that it outsells the 5.3 model. Sorry to be the skeptic!

  • Like 1
Posted

I'll tell if I like it or not after i get custom tune. So far i do not like the clunking every so often and the gear seaching it does once in a while. But I would still take it over a 6 speed.

 

2017 gmc denali ultimate 1500 6.2

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,762
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Chris80s
    Newest Member
    Chris80s
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 906 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still $3.01 with even more places at this price
    • JW2024 and Others is this site for Oshawa built Trucks as well ? Thank You !
    • Thanks JR that would be great if you could do that !!! Do you have a link to where this was discussed before ? I cant seem to find it  Thank You Again !
    • Oil pump noise was discussed before.  I will try to remember to record a remote start later this morning. 
    • There are probably a few threads talking about fuel mileage but this one seemed to fit the stats I have seen based on my typical local driven route but with different outcomes based on different seasons/temperatures. I have a few hundred pounds of items that consistently ride on the truck at all times such as a bak flip cover, rubber bed mat, tools and extra fuel so I would be something over 8100 lb without me in the truck. All these examples are based on a 100 mile round trip to a town plus running around town so maybe 110 to 120 miles in total for a trip. Using regular fuel and I assume it always has some ethanol in it but don't know the percentage they blend in. Also speed wise I am going at 62 mph and non aggressive driving although less speed yet if its crappy winter condition roads. I am going by an initial reset of the computer generated fuel use numbers averaged over a couple of thousand miles or so for each weather/season so they may be more optimistic then actual hand calculated numbers. Basically this is painting a picture of doing the same drive but seasonal conditions and temperature being the major variable to the end result. Oh and although I am in Alberta Canada, I am converting it to miles per US gallon so there is no confusion.    So winter time it gets cold here, no real surprise there and the roads can be clear at times but also often have packed rough snow or are are driving through loose snow ( they do a poor job of plowing the highways ) and yes this includes the extra idle engine time due to trying not to freeze ones butt off. 12.7 mpg is what I was getting during the winter months on average.    Then during the spring when it was around the freezing point and the highways are clear of snow, I was getting around 14.25 mpg.   Summer time, I have been getting around 15.15 on average but certainly some of the trips showed quite a bit better fuel mileage, so much depended on how much or little I had driven around town and number of engine restarts after sitting for a while at each location. But stating a best fuel mileage trip to town pretending that is what the truck gets on average is fooling ones self for sure !.      As I said in a different post, I had driven a 645 mile trip over a couple of days stint to a different destination then these other daily to town examples above, and was done during the summer with nice weather and not bucking a head wind, also keeping at 62 mph and its a rolling landscape type highway drive ( this isn't southern Alberta or Saskatchewan flat lands ) Hand calculated fuel mileage in this case though and it came out to 17.65
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...