Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, smatti said:

Prior to installing these, did you also do the BCM flash that provided more voltage to the headlights? I know the 14s experienced this issue and GMC released the following TSB # PIT5374B to address it. I'm trying to determine if the BCM update would be beneficial or if it's not needed with this new set of lights.

Thanks,
Matt
 

I recently had my truck in for service to do small 4-5 recall items. Not sure if the BCM flash was done. The new lights are strong enough that I don't notice my ProBox/Rigid fogs adding as much to the throw as before

Posted

I believe LED are voltage range tolerant and output isn't affected much by voltage variation.  But some of the electrical engineers we have may chime in with better info.

Posted
On 2/13/2018 at 8:01 AM, Spurshot said:

I noticed my left DRL ring has an intermittent flicker.  It does it only when the engine it running.  It doesn't flicker all the time.  But about half the time it flickers.    Any help would be appreciated.  Is this a capacitor issue or a headlight assembly issue? Wiring?  I have the short jumper harnesses from the OP.

http://www.ddmtuning.com/Products/BOW3 

 

will remove dash errors on most vehicles with bulb self check systems. Will also fix flickering of DRL's when used in conjunction with one of our HID harnesses.

 

Posted (edited)
On 2/13/2018 at 7:01 AM, Spurshot said:

I noticed my left DRL ring has an intermittent flicker.  It does it only when the engine it running.  It doesn't flicker all the time.  But about half the time it flickers.    Any help would be appreciated.  Is this a capacitor issue or a headlight assembly issue? Wiring?  I have the short jumper harnesses from the OP.

Denali? There were a couple Denalis/6.2L that had this issue. Havent seen any 5.3L with a flicker. If I remember correctly they flickered only when the turn signal was applied. Both were fixed using the drl mod. There is no capacitor on the DRL Its using factory functions. The cap is on the low beam only. Only one side? 

Edited by zmnypit
Posted

Just finished my headlight and tail light upgrades. Truck looks great! Much thanks to zmnypit for the adapters and technical support. 

BE3BB590-4A8E-4F72-9BFD-98848E172F41.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On ‎2‎/‎19‎/‎2018 at 2:18 PM, zmnypit said:

Denali? There were a couple Denalis/6.2L that had this issue. Havent seen any 5.3L with a flicker. If I remember correctly they flickered only when the turn signal was applied. Both were fixed using the drl mod. There is no capacitor on the DRL Its using factory functions. The cap is on the low beam only. Only one side? 

I have the 5.3L SLT. and my driver side DRL flickers every once and a while. What DRL mod fixes this?

Posted
Denali? There were a couple Denalis/6.2L that had this issue. Havent seen any 5.3L with a flicker. If I remember correctly they flickered only when the turn signal was applied. Both were fixed using the drl mod. There is no capacitor on the DRL Its using factory functions. The cap is on the low beam only. Only one side? 

Before I swapped headlight assemblies, I added the first version of the vled lmz led lights, had a very faint flicker on my passenger side lol. Couldn’t notice unless I was at a stop light and could see it reflecting on the vehicle in front of me. Never noticed it driving though. 2015 SLT.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
On 3/19/2018 at 7:09 AM, HeathT-87 said:

I have the 5.3L SLT. and my driver side DRL flickers every once and a while. What DRL mod fixes this?

Hard to say. I know it did on the denalis but I have yet to see any 5.3s that flicker. I've asked around as well as check with all the locals and not one has seen or noticed a flicker. Im scratching my head on the 5.3

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Has anyone ran into the truck throwing a code to onstar after swapping assemblies? I’ve noticed in the monthly email diagnostic reports for a good year or more, that there are items needing immediate attention in bold red letters in the opening paragraph. But when you look at the systems, everything is shown as good.

Well I was in for an oil change and I asked the dealer a couple weeks back to look it up for me, they said it had L/R headlights shown as the problem, but couldn’t see anything other than that and referred me to onstar. I called onstar and opened a case. I told them my lights work fine, And the dealer checked them as well and everything was working fine to them.

Onstar got back to me and here’s the email below, any idea what these codes mean?

I have worked case number 84995610 for your 2015 GMC Sierra, and have resolved the issue.

The OnStar Vehicle Daignostics (OVD) emails was showing there was a diagnostic alert for your vehicle this month requiring immediate attention, but there was nothing listed below that needed attention.

The diagnostics did show alerts are for left front head lamp and right front head lamp for your vehicle and that's what triggered that warning at the top of the email. We don’t currently have a fix to include the bulb alert in the email display.

The problem codes are legit though for the bulbs and those codes are B2575 and B2699. I know you stated the dealership already looked into the issue and found nothing wrong, but the computer system in the vehicle is still reporting these codes. Please refer to the service department of your dealership with those codes to be addressed or cleared.

If you have additional questions or concerns, we can be reached at the number listed below, or you can reply to this email.

Thank you,
Kelly
OnStar Connected Vehicle Support
Phone Number: 1-888-4ONSTAR






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,142 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...