Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an 02 Silverado and I am very happy with the comfort of the cloth seats. When I test drove a 2016 Silverado 1500 I didn't find them comfortable. I am not sure if it is because they are not broken in, are you happy with the comfort of your cloth seats in the '14 - '16 Silverado and do they get better as they break in?

 

Thanks

Mike

Posted

The seats in my '16 were awful at first. After 10,000 km, they are a little better, but still not too comfortable.

Posted

The seats in my 2014 and my 2016 All Terrain are great.

Posted

I can't compare to a '02, but when I was looking at trucks, I had a loaner from each of the big 3. The ford was the worst for seat comfort, IMHO, and the Ram was best. To my backside, the GM twins were a close 2nd to the Ram. I am comfortable in it, no complaints. I'm 6', 185 lbs.

Posted

7/10

 

Could be better but they are far from worst seats I ever sat in. They are swapping to a different seat manufacturer in 2018 ... apparently ... so even GM thinks they could be better.

Posted

The cloth seats in my '14 are relatively comfortable; however, the seats in my old '97 were fabulously comfortable! I miss them.

Posted

I find the seats rather comfortable in my 2014 or much better than the Tacoma I previously owned. I have heard that the seats were given more padding for 2016, but I can't compare since I haven't ridden or driven in one. I think comfort is a subjective thing. What might be comfortable for one may not be for another. The seats in the current model are manufactured by Lear corporation. Apparently for the next redesign, GM is going to give Lear more headway in designing the seats as opposed to GM dictating the design due to changes in production.

 

https://thenewswheel.com/next-gen-silverado-sierra-will-have-better-seats-thanks-to-better-supplier-contracts/

Posted

My '15 Denali seats are the most comfortable seats I've had in a truck. First truck I've had where I didn't feel the need to get out and stretch after a multi-hour trip.

Posted

They are ok. Could be better for sure but could be worse. I prefer the seats from 99-06 much more. These you sit on vs sitting in. Plus i hate the material. Very coarse vs soft like they used to be. Makes me think of something you should find in a work truck.

Posted

I've had better, I've had worse. Too narrow and the bolsters are WAY overblown. Most if not all new seats are like that now, I don't get it. Give me a good old bench seat from the 70's.

Posted

I agree, not the worst, but not the best....fairly comfortable 2016 leather.

I also have a 13 explorer XLT with leather buckets and man are those seats comfortable!!

Posted

You can't compair a GMT 800 seat to a K2 seat. Not even in the same class of comfort. The 800's set the standard for nice soft yet supportive seats with an arm rest that could be fiped out of the way if you wished. You just get used to firmer K2 leather seats until you set foot in a 800 again, then it starts all over. One credit is the AC seats work a ton better in the K2 beacuse the 800's did not offer them.

Posted

I will say, My '99 Seats felt better than my 2016 GMC. With that being said, My truck is brand new so it may take a bit for braking in...I hope.

Posted

7/10

 

Could be better but they are far from worst seats I ever sat in. They are swapping to a different seat manufacturer in 2018 ... apparently ... so even GM thinks they could be better.

 

...or cheaper...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,089 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...