Jump to content

2017 6.6 adds 40 hp, or so they say...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

so what's .8 quarts, give or take a quart?

ummm....I am 48 and she is 17.5 is that not close enough?

Posted

.8 isn't much. They were probably trying to account for it burning some, so added a little extra to keep the levels up. So really, you owe them a thank you.

 

I've been known to do it a time or two ?

Posted

.8 isn't much. They were probably trying to account for it burning some, so added a little extra to keep the levels up. So really, you owe them a thank you.

 

I've been known to do it a time or two

I hope this is sarcasm.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

I hope this is sarcasm.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Yes and no. Yes, I don't know what the tech was thinking

No because I have done it before. When manufactures go 10k oil change intervals with an engine that burns oil and owners that don't even know what a dipstick looks like, much less how to check the oil, a little more to start is always better than running way low

Posted

Yes and no. Yes, I don't know what the tech was thinking

No because I have done it before. When manufactures go 10k oil change intervals with an engine that burns oil and owners that don't even know what a dipstick looks like, much less how to check the oil, a little more to start is always better than running way low

 

Don't overfill. Ever. Unless you know exactly how much oil you can put in before the crank starts dipping into it when it rotates.

 

-Eli

Posted

 

Don't overfill. Ever. Unless you know exactly how much oil you can put in before the crank starts dipping into it when it rotates.

 

-Eli

Perhaps I've put my two cents in to an area of a different manufacture that I'm not familiar with. I'll end with in my particular part of the spectrum, .5 over in a 4.5qt system has not shown any problems, and, with an engine that has excessive oil consumption, has prevented several low level problems.
Posted

Perhaps I've put my two cents in to an area of a different manufacture that I'm not familiar with. I'll end with in my particular part of the spectrum, .5 over in a 4.5qt system has not shown any problems, and, with an engine that has excessive oil consumption, has prevented several low level problems.

What engine do you have that only requires 4.5qt? My L86 takes 8.5qt, I would never over fill a fluid. Over filling can be just as bad as running low.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

What engine do you have that only requires 4.5qt? My L86 takes 8.5qt, I would never over fill a fluid. Over filling can be just as bad as running low.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Every Honda engine in the last 20 years or so, give or take an engine or three.
Posted

One can almost obsess so much on being exact that they start to be eccentric to the extreme. As long as the oil level remains between the add and full marks, there is nothing to obsess about and the engine will be just fine. I would really love to have a life that I have so little else to think about that I have time to worry about 1/2 qt. That is almost similar to worrying about tires all being less than 1/2 psi different.

Posted

Only 9 more days until the auto show at the Texas fair. Impatiently waiting!

Posted

Only 9 more days until the auto show at the Texas fair. Impatiently waiting!

Rumor for the new Diesel is that it'll still be lowest rated at 29,000lb. I hope it's not true as GM really needs to step up their game in the towing capacity realm. I do however hope we see the new 2017 Canyon and Colorado duramax's with the new 8 speed tranny. If that's the case that'll be my next commuter car after I sell this VW back.

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...