Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Swathdiver asked:  We need a newer vehicle to replace our Montana and the Terrain is up for consideration but know nothing about its quality and durability.  What year is yours and what can you tell us about it Marty?  TIA.

 

2015 SLE. This generation of Terrain 2.4l motored SUV's had some problems pre 2015 and I know nothing about the new ones. Totally different SUV save the name. 

 

It's been a good vehicle and she drives it hard but not abusive. The 2.4 has cam phasing solenoid issues that are not oil related but can be if you don't practice good oil maintenance practices. Not a problem you would have sir.  It's not an expensive fix and one you could do in the drive. Codes P0010 inlet and P0011 Exhaust. As bad as the GM part is the others like Doorman are worse. 100K on this one before one needed service. 

 

Use the severe service schedule and you will run it a long time. My personal experience with this truck has been that if you use a 30W of either Red Line or AMSOIL it uses very little oil but if you use Mobil or Quaker State etc. it will. I think this had more to do the fact those two are very detergent (keeps the oil control rings working) in nature and if one use the other brands mentioned on shorter OCI's it would be fine. Our OCI is 5K and Red Line 0W30. Surertech 5W30 and 2500/3000 mile changes is a thing I wouldn't mind trying. It might also have something to do with the fact Sugar Bear drives with a fire under her back side. :) 

 

6T45 transmission works nice. It does not have a replaceable filter. It has one but you have to take the trans apart to change it. 50K services, drop and fills have been working fine. We use Valvoline Full Synthetic D6/ 

 

It rides and drives very well. Good long haul rig when you have cloth seats. I would stay away from White. Any flavor of it. Choose a color, any color but not white. Stuff wont stay put not matter how good the prep. The AC 'climate control' is touchy. It's not programed like the 2000-2010 Buicks. Set points of 73 and lower are AC and above are heat. Little blending but it is more annoying that anything else. Small potatoes. 

 

This is built like an Amana Refrigerator. That is good and bad. Door sills are hard to keep clean. Lower plastic shielding on the bottom of the doors has done a fine job of keeping parking lot dents at bay. Very quite. Nice sound system. Pleasant experience. 

 

It is NOT as economical as one might think. Mid 20's at 70 mph on good days and low 20's in wind. Challenged above 75 mph in any sort of head wind for acceleration but will cruse much higher if that is your flavor. The V6 would be more powerful and perhaps more economical. Thing is I'm not sure if it is the same 3.6 as the Cadillac. Some swear by it, some swear at it. Like anything mechanical it's more about you than it....right? We would have bought the V6 if I had known how fuelly the 2.4 is. 

 

GM chrome grill is absolute garbage even if you clear bra it. Some sort of adhesive foil that is paper thin. But then they are all like that. Paint and Bra the entire nose, and A pillars. Leading roof and mirror backs.

 

Would I buy it again. Yes. It's been a workhorse for the wife.  I'd just not get white nor the chrome package and protect the exterior better. I expect this thing to run longer than the body will last. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you Marty, I was wondering if the little 4 would be economical or not, compared with the other offerings.  My wife and yours must've gone to the same driving school!  

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, swathdiver said:

Thank you Marty, I was wondering if the little 4 would be economical or not, compared with the other offerings.  My wife and yours must've gone to the same driving school!  

It could be if.... :) 

 

Posted
On 9/9/2019 at 2:58 PM, Grumpy Bear said:

It could be if.... :) 

 

Never happen with her lead foot!  But maybe there's hope yet!  She's been driving my truck and her weekly run is 476 miles.  She's actually slowed down to try and stretch the tank, trying to complete the week before refueling!  LOL

 

Then she has her eyes on a 6.2 Denali...

  • Haha 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

105,000 Mile Service

 

104,890 actual: 4810 miles OCI. 

 

0W30 Red Line and NAPA Gold filter. Repeat it did. Between a cup and a half quart used. 

Rotate tires. Wearing well. 

Injector service by gas additive. Once each 5K miles.  Routine. Some PEA add. Not that picky. 

Nothing much else to report this time. Running like a top. Dirty as a pig. 

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

110,000 Mile Service

 

110,129 actual: 5239 mile OCI. 

 

5 quarts AMSOIL SS 5W30 and Purolator filter. Less than a cup this time between changes. My guess, the rings were starting to gum up. The Red Line did it's job cleaning them up. I got a good price on the AMSOIL which in this SAE grade has a lower NOACH. Lets see if we can get it home. 

 

Balance and rotate tires. Check brakes and all good. Add a bottle of Gumout Complete to the tank. 

 

Emptied the washer reservoir and refilled with Purple Power -35 fluid. Purged lines. 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

115,000 Mile Service

 

This one will take some time. She ate up a quart and a half in 4,000 miles and turned black as the Ace of Spades. Filler cap is full of white snot and free water. Air filter box full of water as well. PCV systems orifice seems plugged. 

 

Shop will be running test and cleaning to determine root cause. I'll say more when I know more.

 

Don't trouble-trouble till trouble troubles you. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

115,000 Mile Service Redux 

 

114,600 Actual 4471 OCI. 

 

PCV system was indeed plugged. This required removal of the inlet manifold....Yea......

 

Resized_20200303_101047.thumb.jpg.4809dc339fb816cba1484abaa50cff91.jpg

 

AC Delco top end cleaner and two days with a toothbrush had them back to showroom clean..YEA!!!

 

PCV orifice required drilling out per TSB. Plugs were pulled and chamber soaked overnight then Motovac'd. Oil changed twice. 

Valve cover pulled and baffles cleaned. New gaskets though out. 

5 Quarts NAPA D1G2 5W30 (Valvoline Full Synthetic) several NAPA 57082 filters sacrificed. 

 

AC system recharged. 

 

Now we are in the drive and measure mode for oil consumption. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted (edited)

 

Yes it is and the PCV system in internal with a orifice instead of a valve. Stupid system. Even if I wanted to I could not catch can it. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted (edited)

115,316 Mile Service. 

 

115,316 actual 716 mile OCI.

 

Got it hot and dropped a can of GUNK Motor Flush in her and let it idle for 30 minutes. Yuck! This does not speak well of Quaker State UD which was the majority oil since we got her. OR 5K OCI's are too long. 

 

5 Quarts NAPA 5W30 and NAPA filter. 

No measurable oil used but moisture still present. So far, so good. 

 

Target next service at 117,500 or 2200 miles from now. Monitoring moisture and oil consumption. 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

115,904 mile check, 588 miles. Right at full mark. Still a hint of moisture. Miles are coming slow with the wife working from home and our state under a "Shelter in Place" order. 

Posted

3/27/2020

115,912 miles

 

Replaced drivers side low beam. Done through the drivers side fender apron. 3 minutes instead of three hours. Lady down the street noticed it out from her window. (Shelter behavior) :) Thanks!!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...