Jump to content

GM SUVs Score Low On IIHS Headlight Testing


Recommended Posts

Posted

post-139450-0-74793000-1497456366_thumb.jpg

John Goreham
Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com
6-14-2017

General Motors crossovers and SUVs have scored relatively low in a new round of testing by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The Institute started to test and evaluate headlights this past year in a new indoor facility that it built from scratch. One model year since the new testing began, IIHS now includes headlight scores on its overall evaluation. To earn the top score a vehicle must have a trim with headlights that score Acceptable or Good. None of the four GM models IIHS tested earned a score that high.

post-139450-0-87150300-1497456149_thumb.png

This news is particularly bad for GM with regard to the all-new 2018 Chevy Equinox. Because it scores only Marginal, it will not earn the top safety rating that its peers, the RAV4, CR-V, Forester, Rogue, and other models do. Cadillac's XT5 also has few excuses for not being able to score as high as affordable models like the Hyundai Santa Fe and Toyota Highlander which earned scores of Good and Acceptable respectively.

 

post-139450-0-87150300-1497456149_thumb.png

post-139450-0-74793000-1497456366_thumb.jpg

post-139450-0-87150300-1497456149_thumb.png

post-139450-0-74793000-1497456366_thumb.jpg

post-139450-0-87150300-1497456149_thumb.png

post-139450-0-74793000-1497456366_thumb.jpg

Posted

Thank-you, IIHS, for paying attention to "how much glare is created for oncoming drivers".

 

You can throw 1,000,000 candlepower spotlights on the front of a vehicle and see for a mile, but if you are blinding other drivers, you are creating a dangerous situation. Just adding more and more light to your vehicle doesn't equal safety. I think a lot of SUV and truck drivers are oblivious to this fact.

 

And if your excuse is, "I can't see deer that are 1/4 mile in front of me", then you just need to slow down so you can avoid the deer or whatever you are afraid of hitting.

Posted

They strive for the best ratings and fail with the head lights?

 

It's not like that head lights are a new invention. They're part of a car since when, 100 years?

 

Has IIHS taken into account that the head lights are "working as designed"?

Probably not.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

Posted

 

attachicon.gifequinox 18 headlights.jpg

John Goreham

Contributing Writer, GM-Trucks.com

6-14-2017

General Motors crossovers and SUVs have scored relatively low in a new round of testing by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The Institute started to test and evaluate headlights this past year in a new indoor facility that it built from scratch. One model year since the new testing began, IIHS now includes headlight scores on its overall evaluation. To earn the top score a vehicle must have a trim with headlights that score Acceptable or Good. None of the four GM models IIHS tested earned a score that high.

 

This news is particularly bad for GM with regard to the all-new 2018 Chevy Equinox. Because it scores only Marginal, it will not earn the top safety rating that its peers, the RAV4, CR-V, Forester, Rogue, and other models do. Cadillac's XT5 also has few excuses for not being able to score as high as affordable models like the Hyundai Santa Fe and Toyota Highlander which earned scores of Good and Acceptable respectively.

 

I do not see the Forester on the list???

Posted

Super8, good eyes. I should have mentioned that IIHS did a previous test of "small SUVs." In that test, the Forester rated "Poor." A model year has since passed though. Now, the Forester earns an "Acceptable" on some trims. It gets a bit confusing. IIHS tests all the trims that they have available and there are multiple headlight options on each model (not just on Forester, but almost all vehicles.) You can look at the list of the years and trims here. I drive a Forester, and my trim seems to be rated Marginal. I can't argue with that. They are not impressive headlights.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I wonder how much of these issues are related to blinding oncoming drivers rather the poor amount of light they project down the highway? Look @ the complaints about the Chev version of the K2XX trucks. When I was getting ready to order my '17, my nephew said I'd hate the headlights on the Chev. He drives both Chevs & GMCs for work & hated the Chev lighting. I've upgraded to HIDs, so @ least reflective objects are lit down the road.

 

This may be anecdotal, but I think the low beams on my '11 Silverado HD projected more light down the road.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • .30” of rain all month and it’s been weeks since that. “Mowed” our two properties today for the first time since July 2nd. It only took 30 minutes because all I had to do was level some weeds and saplings in a few problem areas. Everything else is dead.
    • Dealer reported a failed shifter module assembly so the whole shifter is getting replaced. Yet another premature repair… up to $12,000+ in extended warranty payout in only 5 years and 80,000 miles! 
    • According to the dealer it’s an internal leak/failure of the compressor.  Again, another failure that shouldn’t happen at only 5 years and 80k miles.  For some reason the compressors must be hard to come by right now, because the truck’s been at the dealer almost a week and they just located a compressor at another dealer several states away today.  We’ll see if this fixes the issue.  
    • I'm not sure if this should be a reply on this thread or a new topic, let me know if it's out of place. This my first post. Thanks 85077522 - ACDelco GM Genuine Parts Brake Master Cylinders. Anyone else had to replace this brake master cylinder yet. I didn't do any brake work, it looks like new parts and I've had the truck for about 4k miles. When it started to throw codes I did the calibrations with a bidirectional scanner and got the codes to clear but they came back so i did the routine; base bleed, automated bleed and final base bleed. All that with Bosch ES16-32N fluid (please look it up). That seemed to fix it but 100ish miles later it failed again so I ran the same process but with a pressure bleeder this time and got the same results, fixed for 100ish miles. The original fluid looked bad and I thought I got most of it out. The codes; P25A2, C05B0-00, C2A1B. I can get them to clear but not for long. The C05B0 indicates a leak in the front circuit (which is bone dry) so I'm thinking of doing the bleed process on that front again today and I don't know if that's taboo to just do the front but at this point it seems like it's worth the try anyway. The new master cylinder/module unit is supposed to get here today. But now I'm pretty much convinced this install is over my head. I've called several shops and some mobile guys that I know but this thing is like radio active material scary wise. I did get 2 local shops say they should be able to do it, one says he has the SPS2 programing capability. And with the battery disconnected is there supposed to be pedal resistance, mine is to the floor, then if I pump it I can get some resistance.
    • I wasn’t commenting on your post. Certainly wasn’t arguing. I was making an observation on my long term experience with supposedly proper length of driving for proper heat cycles. Works for me. Although I have seen water or vapor come out of exhaust when vehicles weren’t run very long and shut off. It’s very humid in the morning. Then hot and humid. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...