Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can I test this from the top side where the fuses are or do I have to remove it to access the x50 connectors underneath.

Posted

Im telling ya, look to see the fuse box diagram. It will show what fuses are open, and what are spares. Then yes, use a test light to see if they are ignition fed or constant. Then, you could lift off the fuse block to get to the bottom.

Posted

Wondering why you need a 12v(constant) and a switched 12v. For one the 12v is on both main posts or batt1 and batt2. And it should be ground and switched. As it is nothing more than a high amp relay. Also I would make sure you have a ignition wire or rap. Hate to have that cycle every time you turn the key.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted

I'm installing as per oem installation.  Tp2....this is a quote as to What is needed for wiring the relay and isolator. 

With those items installed you have completed the install of the new hardware. Now it's time to tackle the wiring aspect. There are only 3 wires we need for this. Switched 12V (only hot when key is in ACC), constant 12V (always hot), and ground. Orange wire is used for switched 12V, red/wh is constant 12V, and black is ground. The two 12V wires will come from the fuse block and the ground will come from the passenger side head. The orange wire is technically the "ignition 3" circuit and is controlled by the BCM..

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
I'm installing as per oem installation.  Tp2....this is a quote as to What is needed for wiring the relay and isolator. 

With those items installed you have completed the install of the new hardware. Now it's time to tackle the wiring aspect. There are only 3 wires we need for this. Switched 12V (only hot when key is in ACC), constant 12V (always hot), and ground. Orange wire is used for switched 12V, red/wh is constant 12V, and black is ground. The two 12V wires will come from the fuse block and the ground will come from the passenger side head. The orange wire is technically the "ignition 3" circuit and is controlled by the BCM..
 
 
 
 
Oh I see what they did there. Ok.
Again it is just like a big single battery as the batt2 does nothing till key is on then it connects to the other battery. Unless you wire accessories to the batt2 but what would that be that isn't controlled buy the key. I have seen trailer power.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

  • 8 months later...
Posted
On 6/28/2017 at 12:17 PM, Spurshot said:

I spent about $500 on parts, installing a second battery in my 2008 truck. The cost is dependent on whether you go with automatic charging management, manual charging management, quality of the components, method of battery isolation/connecting.

Do you have a BOM for the 2008?

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I am just finishing up my factory-style setup on my 2016 Sierra 1500.

 

The harness part # for this age is 23273450. It replaces the original wire that runs from the primary battery to the underhood fuse box (it contains this within the harness). It comes with the relay that controls the battery isolator ("secondary auxiliary relay"). It also includes the auxiliary battery positive terminal with a fuse holder adjacent to the terminal (populated with a 125A fuse), however, it does not come with the cover for this single-fuse box (part # for the cover is 22945779). If you would like to directly draw high gauge cables to accessories (e.g., inverter), you can get the 3-fuse holder from older models (19116352 and cover 15881616) so you get a 100% factory install with provision for accessories. This 3-fuse holder can replace the single fuse holder that comes with the aforementioned harness (just take the battery terminal off of the single fuse holder and set it on the 3-fuse block). In that case, the fuse block sits on the battery just like the single-fuse box would. The distribution block on the primary battery already has a blank 125A spot for the auxiliary battery harness (as seen in photos above), so no modifications are needed there - just some nuts (should be 21021808).

 

Auxiliary battery negative terminal with the wire should be 84354708 (I am still waiting for this last part to complete my setup).

 

The secondary auxiliary relay part # is 12135194. You will have to use either self-tapping screws or rivet nuts to mount it to the firewall.

 

Battery tray part # is 22989633, retainer is 14005061, and the retainer bolt is 11519527, as mentioned here earlier.

 

Next, you need the "X158 Auxiliary Battery Harness to Engine Harness" that supplies ground, (+), and the signal for the relay to the aforementioned auxiliary battery harness (if you don't want to make the connector yourself). Service connector part # is 19367564. If you want to go full-factory, you can get violet/brown and red/white wires online.

 

The black (ground) from the harness, I connected to the ground post on the firewall where the relay is mounted. The violet/brown connects to pin 42 of "X115 Engine Harness to Body Harness" connector near the underhood fuse box and the auxiliary battery. The "body" side of the connector is very accessible and there is already a violet/brown wire that you can tap into (that is the "Run Ignition 3 Voltage" signal). The red/white needs to go to pin G6 of connector X2 of the underhood fuse box - there was no pin in there so I used the terminated lead 19301767. I already had the F52UA fuse installed - that one will supply power for the auxiliary relay, so just adding the terminated lead was enough.

 

Everything works but I am surprised that the relay disconnects the batteries during cranking. Can someone confirm how the system operates? I was expecting the auxiliary battery to "help" during the cranking. I can clearly hear the relay engage when the key is in ON, but disengages during cranking, and engages again when the cranking is over.

Thank you!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Based on pics from the first few pages of this thread, the only difference in the trays is the hole for the hold down with welded nut on the underside?  Correct?  Why buy another tray, I can modify my original tray with a nut easy enough.  Am I missing something?  Place the rubber hold down in the original tray, mark the hole, drill it out and weld a nut on the bottom side.  

Posted
On 11/13/2019 at 8:40 AM, Vuk said:

I am just finishing up my factory-style setup on my 2016 Sierra 1500.

 

 

Thanks for the great post and part numbers.  Do you have any pics of the install or the finished product.  

Posted

Ok call me cheap but for $7.00 you can buy a bolt and the plastic puck for the hold down then remove factory tray and there is a metal tap you just increase the angle on a very small amount. Reinstall tray and your done.
Tap is in photo 2 28bd21a984993cc1d49b40dcb9859d17.jpg82a168b292f46cfef83a5e447c885665.jpg

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
Based on pics from the first few pages of this thread, the only difference in the trays is the hole for the hold down with welded nut on the underside?  Correct?  Why buy another tray, I can modify my original tray with a nut easy enough.  Am I missing something?  Place the rubber hold down in the original tray, mark the hole, drill it out and weld a nut on the bottom side.  
Hole is already there on mine and I just used a hardware store nut.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
I am just finishing up my factory-style setup on my 2016 Sierra 1500.
 
The harness part # for this age is 23273450. It replaces the original wire that runs from the primary battery to the underhood fuse box (it contains this within the harness). It comes with the relay that controls the battery isolator ("secondary auxiliary relay"). It also includes the auxiliary battery positive terminal with a fuse holder adjacent to the terminal (populated with a 125A fuse), however, it does not come with the cover for this single-fuse box (part # for the cover is 22945779). If you would like to directly draw high gauge cables to accessories (e.g., inverter), you can get the 3-fuse holder from older models (19116352 and cover 15881616) so you get a 100% factory install with provision for accessories. This 3-fuse holder can replace the single fuse holder that comes with the aforementioned harness (just take the battery terminal off of the single fuse holder and set it on the 3-fuse block). In that case, the fuse block sits on the battery just like the single-fuse box would. The distribution block on the primary battery already has a blank 125A spot for the auxiliary battery harness (as seen in photos above), so no modifications are needed there - just some nuts (should be 21021808).
 
Auxiliary battery negative terminal with the wire should be 84354708 (I am still waiting for this last part to complete my setup).
 
The secondary auxiliary relay part # is 12135194. You will have to use either self-tapping screws or rivet nuts to mount it to the firewall.
 
Battery tray part # is 22989633, retainer is 14005061, and the retainer bolt is 11519527, as mentioned here earlier.
 
Next, you need the "X158 Auxiliary Battery Harness to Engine Harness" that supplies ground, (+), and the signal for the relay to the aforementioned auxiliary battery harness (if you don't want to make the connector yourself). Service connector part # is 19367564. If you want to go full-factory, you can get violet/brown and red/white wires online.
 
The black (ground) from the harness, I connected to the ground post on the firewall where the relay is mounted. The violet/brown connects to pin 42 of "X115 Engine Harness to Body Harness" connector near the underhood fuse box and the auxiliary battery. The "body" side of the connector is very accessible and there is already a violet/brown wire that you can tap into (that is the "Run Ignition 3 Voltage" signal). The red/white needs to go to pin G6 of connector X2 of the underhood fuse box - there was no pin in there so I used the terminated lead 19301767. I already had the F52UA fuse installed - that one will supply power for the auxiliary relay, so just adding the terminated lead was enough.
 
Everything works but I am surprised that the relay disconnects the batteries during cranking. Can someone confirm how the system operates? I was expecting the auxiliary battery to "help" during the cranking. I can clearly hear the relay engage when the key is in ON, but disengages during cranking, and engages again when the cranking is over.
Thank you!
First I have to state I am impressed. I was far to lazy to do the part search. I have a aftermarket relay and isolator and it connects only with key. Or when stock dies I can over ride the power to the isolator with a switch, that is powered by the 2nd battery. Start truck and switch back. This also means both charge as I drive.
I got around all day like this when stock was dead.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 11/15/2019 at 11:13 PM, gmcdawg said:

Based on pics from the first few pages of this thread, the only difference in the trays is the hole for the hold down with welded nut on the underside?  Correct?  Why buy another tray, I can modify my original tray with a nut easy enough.  Am I missing something?  Place the rubber hold down in the original tray, mark the hole, drill it out and weld a nut on the bottom side.  

The trays differ in two things. One is the hole for the retainer bolt - you can easily put a rivet nut there and you would be done. The second difference is the lip on the opposite side of the battery that holds the rear in (you lower the battery into the tray, you slide it towards the driver seat, the bottom edge of the battery locks into the lip on the rear, and then you put the retainer over the front edge). If I were to do this again, I would modify the old tray (now I found another project to use the old tray).

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, 1SLOW1500 said:

First I have to state I am impressed. I was far to lazy to do the part search. I have a aftermarket relay and isolator and it connects only with key. Or when stock dies I can over ride the power to the isolator with a switch, that is powered by the 2nd battery. Start truck and switch back. This also means both charge as I drive.
I got around all day like this when stock was dead.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

This factory setup will charge them both when the motor is running, I am just confused with the batteries begin disconnected during cranking. This may be a feature on these model years because the BCM can shut down stuff if the voltage gets too low to disturb cranking? But what would be the purpose for the factory aux battery then, if this is the case? I will have my own accessories, that is OK for me, but what would the factory-intended purpose be? Was the BCM software updated with this feature starting from 2016 when the aux battery package was not offered any more? Is this maybe the reason why the tray is replaced with the dummy version (that is, the BCM takes care of over-discharge so the aux battery is not as necessary any more)? This is just me thinking why it would disconnect the aux battery during cranking.

Edited by Vuk
Posted
22 hours ago, 2003 SSEi said:

Thanks for the great post and part numbers.  Do you have any pics of the install or the finished product.  

Yes, I will post detailed pics in a couple of days - I am fighting the frame rust for the past couple of days...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,875 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...