Jump to content

Horsepower arguments


DONWT15

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Rob Okray said:

Unless you were driving 426 Hemi. 

True, but there weren't many of those running around and very hard to find.

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
5 hours ago, Donstar said:

The '67 Ford line-up of cars was pretty impressive and perhaps my all-time favorite.  The Falcon, Fairlane, Mustang and Galaxie could be found at the grocery store or race track. The pick-ups and vans of this year were also fun to drive!

They were good looking cars.

Posted

Have you ever thought that for us old guys,  part of the allure of driving trucks now comes from our experience with cars in the 60's/70's? Those vehicles had power, for those days, but they also had unique styling. 

 

The cars of today have decent power, but the styling is so bland and monotonous that it's often hard to tell the difference between them.  Trucks on the other hand, have that unique styling that we're used to. You can't mistake a GM truck for a Ford or Ram.

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, HawkeyeSierra said:

Have you ever thought that for us old guys,  part of the allure of driving trucks now comes from our experience with cars in the 60's/70's? Those vehicles had power, for those days, but they also had unique styling. 

 

The cars of today have decent power, but the styling is so bland and monotonous that it's often hard to tell the difference between them.  Trucks on the other hand, have that unique styling that we're used to. You can't mistake a GM truck for a Ford or Ram.

 

 

 

Very good point.  Everything is a rolling gum drop these days.

Posted

Speed and power are something that you get immune or accustomed to, in my opinion.  For me, it's been something that I could never get enough of anyways.  My first real "fast" car was my 1998 Camaro SS that I bought when I was in high school.  It was a blast to drive and was one of the faster cars available then without dropping outrageous money.  I still have my 2002 Camaro SS that honestly doesn't get driven much because it no longer feels fast though can still be fun.  Working in the automotive industry and driving some of the vehicles I've been able to has made me develop the "immunity".  My previous pickup, a 2010 Silverado with the NHT package (6.2 Max Trailering) was great at first.  Due to the immunity factory, shortly afterwards, I "needed" an intake, full exhaust and tune.  Then I "needed" a blower and then a cam and smaller pulley.  I stopped modifying it as it was my daily driver when it had 499hp 556lbft to the ground and knew I'd need to build the tranny eventually.  For a 1/2 ton pickup it was really quick and would surprise you but once again having the opportunity to drive what I have, boosted V8s, V10s, V12s, and high horse powered NA engines, it's desensitized me.  With todays engineering, both on the engines and the suspension systems, fast vehicles don't even seem fast at times because they ride so well and you feel so much more in control of the vehicles.  My concern now is vehicles are getting so powerful that they can easily get away from you if you're not careful because of the handling characteristics can give you that false sense of security.

Posted

Hummm, I’ve been driving over 40 years I’ll never get desensitized. I don’t require 500 plus horsepower out of my DD cruiser. The couple times a week I drive my old modified truck or my wife’s sports car never gets old.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, BlkSS said:

Speed and power are something that you get immune or accustomed to, in my opinion.  For me, it's been something that I could never get enough of anyways.  My first real "fast" car was my 1998 Camaro SS that I bought when I was in high school.  It was a blast to drive and was one of the faster cars available then without dropping outrageous money.  I still have my 2002 Camaro SS that honestly doesn't get driven much because it no longer feels fast though can still be fun.  Working in the automotive industry and driving some of the vehicles I've been able to has made me develop the "immunity".  My previous pickup, a 2010 Silverado with the NHT package (6.2 Max Trailering) was great at first.  Due to the immunity factory, shortly afterwards, I "needed" an intake, full exhaust and tune.  Then I "needed" a blower and then a cam and smaller pulley.  I stopped modifying it as it was my daily driver when it had 499hp 556lbft to the ground and knew I'd need to build the tranny eventually.  For a 1/2 ton pickup it was really quick and would surprise you but once again having the opportunity to drive what I have, boosted V8s, V10s, V12s, and high horse powered NA engines, it's desensitized me.  With todays engineering, both on the engines and the suspension systems, fast vehicles don't even seem fast at times because they ride so well and you feel so much more in control of the vehicles.  My concern now is vehicles are getting so powerful that they can easily get away from you if you're not careful because of the handling characteristics can give you that false sense of security.

There is a difference in wanting more power and needing more power.

 

:)

so long

j-ten-ner

Posted
3 minutes ago, j-ten-ner said:

There is a difference in wanting more power and needing more power.

 

:)

so long

j-ten-ner

First World Problems...

Posted
34 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

Hummm, I’ve been driving over 40 years I’ll never get desensitized. I don’t require 500 plus horsepower out of my DD cruiser. The couple times a week I drive my old modified truck or my wife’s sports car never gets old.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I  get excited about driving a new or different truck but to me the horsepower number means little.  My 60+ hp Harley will give me all the power thrill I want or need!

Posted
I  get excited about driving a new or different truck but to me the horsepower number means little.  My 60+ hp Harley will give me all the power thrill I want or need!

I guess so, power to weight more than enough.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
21 minutes ago, Donstar said:

I  get excited about driving a new or different truck but to me the horsepower number means little.  My 60+ hp Harley will give me all the power thrill I want or need!

I'm the same way when getting into a new truck. Only it's my toy, a Plymouth Duster right now, that gives me the thrills. Besides, I don't want my Daily Driver to be the one that get's me into trouble. I just want it to get me from point A to B, while towing the trouble... My 5.3/8sp High Country does that perfectly fine, and in comfort...

Posted
9 hours ago, Rob Okray said:

Unless you were driving 426 Hemi. 

There were a handful in our area. Some odd balls too. An  OD Green Hemi Coronet 4 dr 4 speed with a bench seat is one I remember well. Owned and street raced often by a local wrench at a Phillips 66 full service on Friday nights. Didn't loose often but one of the ones he did loose was to my Uncle's stock 67 Fairlane GT Convertible. It wasn't pretty. Keith didn't come out of hiding for a month and when he did it was laddered and sporting tubs and 10" slicks.  It was always their problem. Grip in street trim. A lesson that wasn't lost on me. 

 

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

It was always their problem. Grip in street trim

Smoking tires and loud exhaust does not equal speed. Can be a fun show, but wasted energy.

Posted

Loving the trip down memory lane by everyone.

 

Still kind of waiting for someone to complain about their "POS" GM engine.

With all the posts on these forums by unhappy owners, expected to get beat up.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 293 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • are there any codes? with lots of rust, perhaps disconnect/clean both sides of the connection/examine cable ends (the wires) for corrosion going into the sheath & replace if necessary/reconnect ALL the power AND ground cables between the battery, engine, frame, cab, fuse box and starter charm.li (website) has a no-start diagnostic procedure you can work through to get it working.
    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...