Jump to content

Horsepower arguments

DONWT15

By DONWT15
in Engines & Drivetrain

Recommended Posts

DONWT15 Enthusiast

DONWT15

Posted
  • Author
Posted
13 minutes ago, Donstar said:

Don,  I'm right behind you with a son. I am happy not feeling ancient - no time to feel old!

Less free time now than when I was still working. Funny how that works.

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
duquephart Enthusiast

duquephart

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, DONWT15 said:

Been retired for awhile now and remember growing up in the late 60's during the muscle car wars. Anybody else in that category?

My overall point is I am surprised how many complaints there are about the power these engines put out.

Take the 5.3 for example: 355 HP from 325 cubic inches. That's 1.1 hp/cube! That's pretty darn good.

Back in the old days 1 HP per cubic inch was the Holy Grail for performance engines and took some serious work to get there.

My 2015 with the 5.3 (6 speed) has great acceleration and very good mileage.

I guess it's all in what your used to.

Any and all comments or insults are welcome.

 

Does a '69 Nova 350/300 4 speed count?

DONWT15 Enthusiast

DONWT15

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, duquephart said:

 

Does a '69 Nova 350/300 4 speed count?

Absolutely.

 

I should list what I had since I didn't at the beginning:

 

1967 Mercury Cyclone GT   390 with a 4 speed (more or less a Fairlane)

1969 Plymouth Road Runner  440 with an auto (dreamed of Superbirds)

1971 Dodge Charger  400 with auto

1971 Chevelle SS 396 (402) with 4 speed

1974 Dodge Dart Sport  340 with an auto (the family stuff was kicking in)

All but the 67 Merc had at least a set of headers and a Holley.

 

After that family life took over and went through several 4 door Oldsmobiles, Buicks, Pontiacs, then started buying pickups in the late 90's. This 2015 Silverado would give every one of them a good run for the money.

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, DONWT15 said:

Absolutely.

 

I should list what I had since I didn't at the beginning:

 

1967 Mercury Cyclone GT   390 with a 4 speed (more or less a Fairlane)

1969 Plymouth Road Runner  440 with an auto (dreamed of Superbirds)

1971 Dodge Charger  400 with auto

1971 Chevelle SS 396 (402) with 4 speed

1974 Dodge Dart Sport  340 with an auto (the family stuff was kicking in)

All but the 67 Merc had at least a set of headers and a Holley.

 

After that family life took over and went through several 4 door Oldsmobiles, Buicks, Pontiacs, then started buying pickups in the late 90's. This 2015 Silverado would give every one of them a good run for the money.

67 Merc Cyclone. Now there's one quick car. Good looking too.  

DONWT15 Enthusiast

DONWT15

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

67 Merc Cyclone. Now there's one quick car. Good looking too.  

 

That's the one I actually miss the most. It came with the factory chrome valve covers and air cleaner.

Most times if I mention it a lot of people have never heard of it.

Fun car.

Mileguru Enthusiast

Mileguru

Posted
Posted
On 2/9/2018 at 5:04 PM, HoosierZ said:

Now some people think a truck needs 500hp to tow a lawn mower. 

I love this quote SO much!

I'm probably going to put it in my sig someday =)

With that said, I have a 6.2L with a TVS1900, ECM tune, TCM tune, and water/methanol to tow my lawn mower LOL!

Orlando8 Enthusiast

Orlando8

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, DONWT15 said:

 

That's the one I actually miss the most. It came with the factory chrome valve covers and air cleaner.

Most times if I mention it a lot of people have never heard of it.

Fun car.

My first car in High School was a 71 Cyclone

DONWT15 Enthusiast

DONWT15

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Orlando8 said:

My first car in High School was a 71 Cyclone

Good looking car. Built during the NASCAR aero wars.

 

How do you like the 5.3?

Orlando8 Enthusiast

Orlando8

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, DONWT15 said:

Good looking car. Built during the NASCAR aero wars.

 

How do you like the 5.3?

love it, so far (knock on wood) truck has been flawless

Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, DONWT15 said:

 

That's the one I actually miss the most. It came with the factory chrome valve covers and air cleaner.

Most times if I mention it a lot of people have never heard of it.

Fun car.

They want to forget it because all they saw of it was tail lights. :lol:

Rob Okray Enthusiast

Rob Okray

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

They want to forget it because all they saw of it was tail lights. :lol:

Unless you were driving 426 Hemi. 

Donstar Senior Enthusiast

Donstar

Posted
Posted

The '67 Ford line-up of cars was pretty impressive and perhaps my all-time favorite.  The Falcon, Fairlane, Mustang and Galaxie could be found at the grocery store or race track. The pick-ups and vans of this year were also fun to drive!

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

In the early mid 70s the fastest muscle cars were olds and especially Buick’s. The mid sized Buick’s had more torque and HP with the 455 stage 2


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

GRN69CHV Enthusiast

GRN69CHV

Posted
Posted

Keep a few things in mind in regards to HP.  Cylinder head design has come a long way as has manufacturing techniques and materials including gaskets.  Aluminum heads on iron blocks were guaranteed to leak 40+ years ago and the heads were prone to physical failure.  Camshaft designs!  Advent of hydraulic roller cams added power, not just peak HP but power everywhere especially peak torque.  EFI, engine management systems, they all work to increase efficiency.  I've personally built and ran a mild 454 based engine that was in the 550HP range and a 540 cubic inch BBC that dyno'd just over 700HP, idled at 800 rpm in gear with the AC running.  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By KARNUT · Posted

      First off use it in the way you’re more comfortable. In working in off road situations most of my life I used 4WD low range very little. In most cases when equipped I used auto 4WD. If I wanted maximum control going up and down very steep terrain  I used low range. Especially if I was driving a diesel. Same with very rutted terrain. In very muddy or snowy conditions I wanted momentum so high range worked well for that. With gravel ramps with limited traction I would try high range first. I would want smooth even increasing speed if I was fighting traction. Low range could give you too much to the wheels breaking traction trying to move. 
    • Z45
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By Z45 · Posted

      Having owned 4wd vehicle since the 1970s I find there are varying opinions on how to use 4wd, every owner is an expert in their minds.  IMO, 4LO is the appropriate gear and what I would use,  You have to feather the gas to avoid spinning tires and the lower the gear the better chance.  But like I said you will find those that think their method is best.  I live near a boat launch.  Yesterday there was a new Ford Maverick pulling out a pontoon boat almost 2x its size, they had no problems and they don't have a LO range.   True story. One winter day not long ago I was coming out of small town post office and there was a F150 4wd parked in front and was stuck foot deep snow ruts. I knew the lady so I asked her to put it in 4wd (wondering why in the middle of a 2-day snow storm she wasn't).  Her reply surprised me, "my husband" (the expert) told me not use that because it uses too much gas. She finally got unstuck spinning in 2wd which likely used more gas than not.  
    • dna9656
      New to Me 2010 SLE (Quirks, Issues)

      By dna9656 · Posted

      Your tire pressure issue may just be batteries, you can reset them using tge Ing switch (I think) and the owner's  manual. ChatGTP will b e a faster, better help than Google.
    • Another JR
      Towing In Loose Gravel

      By Another JR · Posted

      The thinking is that starting out in a higher gear makes it easier to avoid applying excessive torque when pressing the gas pedal. In a modern 4wd truck with 4 low and a limited slip or locking rear end, I would use 4 low and try to crawl up the ramp. Sometimes if they are too slippery, you have to back up to let the boat have some bouyancy, and then accelerate briskly to get some momentum to help you pull the through the slippery parts. 
    • XY74
      Roll up bed cover experiences

      By XY74 · Posted

      I have a Retrax pro that I first had on my 2020 chevy and transferred it to my current GMC.  It stays in the garage most of the time, so hard for me to judge it's long term weather resistance.  It still works perfectly, been very durable.  It doesn't see oil patch usage, but it's not a mall queen.  It keeps most things mostly dry (small leaks) and the security of it is enough to slow someone down but not keep them out for long.  I would buy one again, it works for me.     

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...