Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’d have to double check what version. But just got back from pulling a trailer from Cincinnati to and through the smoky mountains, good investment. No codes.

Posted

So am I understanding correctly that this device plugs in and keeps the 5.3 in 8 cylinder mode full time?

 

If so, what kind of mpg are you getting without the benefit of the "sometimes" 4 cylinder mode?

Posted

Too soon to tell on fuel mileage but so far seems the same.  Yes - device plugs right into the OBD2 port under the dash.

Posted
So am I understanding correctly that this device plugs in and keeps the 5.3 in 8 cylinder mode full time?
 
If so, what kind of mpg are you getting without the benefit of the "sometimes" 4 cylinder mode?


Will depend on your driving habits. If a lot of highway driving at 65, probably drop. Someone who drives around town and start stop probably wouldn't notice a difference because the AFM wouldn't kick in much


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I bought the Range AFM disabler after I swapped in a Flowmaster Force II dual system.  Without the in-pipe flap, the 4-cyl drone is awful.  I tried the Range several times.  Each time, I removed it after it threw codes or the truck refused to start.  The last time, I was lucky to clear codes when I removed it after the truck would not start (it would start immediately once I removed it).  

 

I think the Range AFM disabler has flaws that are not worth the aggravation.  For now, if I want it in 8cyl, I use M5 transmission setting.  I still have the OEM single exhaust and bought the good Borla muffler.  So, I may reinstall the stock system (has the flap/valve after the stock muffler) with the better Borla muffler and let the system flip between 4 and 8 (no more drone).  

Posted

You all may look into the hyper tech tuners. You can disable AFM for a certain speed. So have it come on at highway speeds, have it disabled at lower speeds.

I went with a diablo and just turned it completely off. Haven’t noticed but maybe a .2 - .3 hit on mpg over the last 2.5 to 3 years. I’m doing a lot more highway driving now than I did and I may pick one up. Afm on hilly country roads is abysmal from my experience with it, highway speeds it wasn’t bad at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, TedH said:

I bought the Range AFM disabler after I swapped in a Flowmaster Force II dual system.  Without the in-pipe flap, the 4-cyl drone is awful.  I tried the Range several times.  Each time, I removed it after it threw codes or the truck refused to start.  The last time, I was lucky to clear codes when I removed it after the truck would not start (it would start immediately once I removed it).  

 

I think the Range AFM disabler has flaws that are not worth the aggravation.  For now, if I want it in 8cyl, I use M5 transmission setting.  I still have the OEM single exhaust and bought the good Borla muffler.  So, I may reinstall the stock system (has the flap/valve after the stock muffler) with the better Borla muffler and let the system flip between 4 and 8 (no more drone).  

What was the software version of your range unit, the newest version available currently is 8.6 is it supposed to solve those issues and the battery draw when sitting. 

Posted (edited)

Range began their operation with a module that kept the GMT900 (07-13 1500s) trucks in V4 mode a lot more than the factory GM programming did.  Then several of us asked them to make a Range V8 module that would turn off the AFM 4-cylinder function, in order to help alleviate our excessive oil consumption.  It worked.  They have worked out the bugs for their V8 module on the new trucks--no more codes are being thrown, nor do they run your battery down anymore on the 14-now 1500s.  Most of us could tell little to no difference in fuel mileage with the AFM turned off; some reported better driveability (smoother shifts, no clunk when in and out of AFM, etc.), and aftermarket exhaust systems sound a lot better with no AFM.  

 

I used my Range V8 module until the contacts got messed up from taking it out/putting it back in during dealer visits.  Then I noticed the little blue lights were not all on anymore, and the DIC showed the truck was in V4 mode once in a while.  So I got a Hypertech 2.0 Energy Programmer and tuned out AFM.  The Hypertech also allows you to do other tuning and read and clear diagnostic trouble codes.  

Edited by MaverickZ71
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I understand that it's a little cheaper, but why not just spend a little more money (  
For instance, you can get a hypertech for ~$300. You will get this function without the need to keep something plugged in, plus you get to program everything else...
 
I'm just curious what the decision point was for purchasing these..
 

I ordered the Hypertech tuner question is I was reading the manual online and it says v4 off between the 15 and 35 are the 4 options. But reading diff posts some say they have it turn on after 65mph? Is there a diff option am I missing something just wondering.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

I used hypertec on my 14 GMC. As I posted a few times over the years I didn’t see a measurable difference in fuel mileage at highway speeds in the south (70 plus MPH) with V4 off. There’s been lots of posting that tunes voids the warranty, no one has come forward with that happening yet with gas tuning. The range is supposed to be warranty friendly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I've put 40k miles on my Range in my '11 5.3 Tahoe now and zero issues. MPG is down 1 mpg highway. I'm at 77k miles now when it needs a qt. of oil it's at 10% on the OLM which is about 8500 miles.

OnStar picks up a aftermarket device being plugged in but so what as I'm out of warranty.

It works as advertised and I'm satisfied.

 

Posted

I ordered the Hypertech tuner question is I was reading the manual online and it says v4 off between the 15 and 35 are the 4 options. But reading diff posts some say they have it turn on after 65mph? Is there a diff option am I missing something just wondering.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pulled this from a YouTube vid for a max energy 2.0 on a 2014 Silverado. I’ve heard plenty report turning it off at highway speeds as well. The online manual is probably somewhat generic. 8e5b045405b9fdb396680928f595575a.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Pulled this from a YouTube vid for a max energy 2.0 on a 2014 Silverado. I’ve heard plenty report turning it off at highway speeds as well. The online manual is probably somewhat generic. 8e5b045405b9fdb396680928f595575a.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for that I tried looking at diff videos and what not. I figured the manual is generic or dated lol thanks again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Another quick question anyone ever had any issues with turning V4 off or put it to only turn on on highway speeds. Not sure what way to go.

Posted
Another quick question anyone ever had any issues with turning V4 off or put it to only turn on on highway speeds. Not sure what way to go.

No afm for about 3.5 years for me, no issues


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Google converting 98 4.3 spider injection to carburetor if all else fails. 
    • That computer lies!
    • My centre console USB ports haven’t been working and the one in the glovebox is starting to act up. When I plug my phone into the cord the radio will go black and stop playing, and the CarPlay is inconsistent.   I checked the fuses and they were fine. I changed the USB port out and still nothing. Hoping for some advice on what I should be looking at.  
    • The truck is a 1995 Chevrolet S10 Blazer, 4.3 VIN "W" engine. :cracks knuckles:   On a whim - because I needed a headache - this truck was for sale so I stopped to take a look. Doesn't run. Well, it does, but barely. Long crank, choppy idle, bad misfire(s), it REEKS of fuel. I can DO this..I'm thinking. Diamond in the rough. One owner until last year. A young guy is selling it, he bought it 6 months ago. It stranded him more than once, he's got a newborn. It was in the shop 10 days ago and he "thinks" they said it needs a new fuel injection system. He can't put any more money into it, needs it gone. I was thinking of upgrading my Macbook, which is a total want, not a need. For less than the price of a new laptop I can have fun for months tinkering on this truck and enjoying it. I'm taking this truck home. The guy was beyond thrilled, his wife was there, she thanked me profusely, I could tell they were hurting. They seemed like good people in a bind.   Some parts, a wash, maybe a set of tires, and I can have a few months of fun and then turn it for beer money (or the next project).   Sure enough, there's a work order from a shop last week in the INCHES of paperwork on this truck dating back to when the first owner bought it. They put a new distributor in it, fuel injection work describes basically opening the plenum and putting it back together. He said he couldn't afford any more work so he had them button it up and that's when he put it up for sale.   I'm not well versed in 4.3. I did discover 1995 uses the 1992-1995 SCPI "Spider" injector which is riddled with issues from splitting lines, clogged or cracked poppet valves and plastic spider legs that crumble over time. Cool. I'll just order me a ne---. Oh, the auto parts store doesn't have it? Rock Auto doesn't have it. eBay? $$$$$$ for used. These are UNAVAILABLE period end of story unless you know "a guy" who's still got one in a box somewhere.   Can't upgrade to the '96-'04 injector, it's a different plenum, wiring/pinout and sensor config.   There are a few kinda "know a guy" -guy rebuild services for these injectors out there for about $350. Okay, Okay... I'd like to know if anyone has used them? Anyone got a lead on these crappy 92-95 spiders?   I also don't want to send MY spider to Narnia and back without knowing if that's truly the problem. I guess I'll need to pull apart the plenum and do some digging.   I was also thrown for a loop. This 1995 model year truck has an OBD-II connector. The interface is decidedly not OBD-II. I can read and reset trouble codes and view live data, but there's not a lot of data. Like misfire count and on what cylinder, that's not there. It's OBD-1.5.   Nothing is ever easy. Now it makes sense why this guy wanted to disappear this thing for cheap. I'm guessing the shop told him the injector is toast, the part is unobtainable and they're not going to sort sending the thing to a rando offering rebuild service on craigslist, and the kid likely can't be without a working car for 3 weeks even if they'd facilitate that.   Experience with these early SCPI's? Stories? Things to check? Sympathy? (..Nah...)   This can sit until I sort it. But I haven't had a problem with a vehicle I couldn't easily solve in a long time.    
    • I have four that read by the dash 8 to 10% better than miles/pump calculations and I have one that is spot on. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...