Jump to content

Sierra/Silverado vs. RAM 1500


Recommended Posts

Posted

This post doesn't make sense.    Drive them all and pick the one you like.  It's really that simple.   Every single manufacturer has "issues"  and nightmare customer service stories.

 

I'm a snob too when it comes to vehicles, but when spending this kind of money... there's no reason not to be. 

 

I've had a new Silverado every couple years since the 2007 new body style and the 2016 LTZ Z71 I had was the biggest piece of crap I had ever owned and will probably prevent me from ever going back to GM ... and I've had 6 different Bowties (cars, trucks, SUVs) over the past 8 years.

 

I drove all of the newest .. of course not the 2019 Silverado, but like I said .. I don't think I'd even consider it.   I picked the truck I liked best and am happy so far.

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
I have no need at this time for an upgrade to a 2019. 
Just because a new platform rolls out, we should jump on board and upgrade?
This theory is what drives the truck prices this day and age.
I think the T1 overall is a big step up for GM.
Odd to hang out on a particular thread or topic?
Isn't that what this site is about? I enjoy reading and posting in all topics related to my interests.
After-all, this is a GM Forum. I just find it funny that some come here to rant and rave about RAM.
There is a RAM forum for that.
What about Ford? Surely there should be some praises and pictures of new F-150's as well right?
 
[emoji4]
 

It does say GM vs Ram in the topic. I know a few people who have Rams some with many miles. Haven’t seen the problems stated here quality control wise. Repeat buyers too. I would buy based on price mostly GM was usually cheaper. I owned the big three didn’t really see one much better than the other. GM usually was quicker through the years, Ford usually held up better. I usually traded every two years or 100K miles, they all were usually trouble free in that space of time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Kind of a-holey comments towards the OP.  Sorry but you blue collar, rough and tough guys need to realize people want the higher end trucks and the heaviest work they'll do is carrying mulch bags from Lowes once a year or carrying their kids bikes to the river on weekends.  Maybe a couple of plants here and there, etc. are also in the mix.  They have white collar jobs and aren't bragging when referencing a 110k Benz, just letting you know price isn't the object but having a nice interior and capacity is.  They have no plans to tow a backhoe daily or tow anything more than a Uhaul helping their neighbor. Lighten up Francis!

 

Now, back to the original topic.  This guy needs more towing and all full sized trucks (yes, contrary to what you think, both Nissan and Toyota make them - reminds me of the quote from The Blues Brothers: "What kind of music are they playing".  Redneck looks astonished and says "Both kinds", "Country and Western"..I digress).  Anyway, the answer to his question is brand loyalty and how much $hit you're willing to put up with to stay loyal.  Chevy shake, Eco-BOOM, questionable quality on RAMs, crap mileage on Tundras (but generally reliable), etc.  That is how Shakerados sell despite being way behind in interior quality or other subjective amenities.  They're all so close in (lack of) quality, towing, mileage or other stuff "truck" guys are supposed to care about.

Posted
50 minutes ago, cltsig said:

Sorry but you blue collar, rough and tough guys need to realize people want the higher end trucks and the heaviest work they'll do is carrying mulch bags from Lowes once a year or carrying their kids bikes to the river on weekends.  Maybe a couple of plants here and there, etc. are also in the mix.  They have white collar jobs and aren't bragging when referencing a 110k Benz, just letting you know price isn't the object but having a nice interior and capacity is.  They have no plans to tow a backhoe daily or tow anything more than a Uhaul helping their neighbor.

This statement best proves the point as to why trucks are exceeding $70k this day and age.

Makes it harder for the blue collar guy or the family with a true need for a truck be able to justify the price, even with lower trim level packages.

These buyers are forced into finding an older truck with higher mileage for a $20-30K premium and cross their fingers as the warranties expire.

Once Gas hits the $3 and up range again, even the white collar guy will switch back to his 110k Benz

Posted
29 minutes ago, Sierra Dan said:

This statement best proves the point as to why trucks are exceeding $70k this day and age.

Makes it harder for the blue collar guy or the family with a true need for a truck be able to justify the price, even with lower trim level packages.

These buyers are forced into finding an older truck with higher mileage for a $20-30K premium and cross their fingers as the warranties expire.

Once Gas hits the $3 and up range again, even the white collar guy will switch back to his 110k Benz

 

I dont disagree with anything you said except the $3 gas comment...I know plenty of people that easily drop $1,500 or more at the track in a weekend racing cars. Three dollar a gallon gas isnt going to phase them at all...If you can buy a $110k benz you arent stressing about gas prices unless you bought way too much car attempting to show off.

 

If gas prices were to add two more dollars per gallon and they typically buy 20 gallons a week, thats only 2k year in increased cost. Thats play money for some of these people. If it were to go up an addition $4 per gallon its still only 4k per year.

...and please note- Im not saying it wouldnt impact me. Im just saying there are people that dont even consider these types of prices increases. People that spend 5k a year having fresh flowers delivered to their houses just to watch them die.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Sierra Dan said:

This statement best proves the point as to why trucks are exceeding $70k this day and age.

Makes it harder for the blue collar guy or the family with a true need for a truck be able to justify the price, even with lower trim level packages.

These buyers are forced into finding an older truck with higher mileage for a $20-30K premium and cross their fingers as the warranties expire.

Once Gas hits the $3 and up range again, even the white collar guy will switch back to his 110k Benz

I don't disagree but it is what it is.   Quite possibly the higher end trucks with their larger margins are subsidizing the lower end, lower margin trucks with all of their attendant safety systems and electronica.  Without that, the prices could/would be higher. The Big 3 print money with these things and the ceiling on prices keeps inching up.  Personally, I'm tapping out and looking at a used Toyota that I can drive into the ground.  Granted, I'll need to put in a new stereo because they suck donkey d1ck but it'll run forever on low grade gas.

Posted

Thanks everyone for good info (even to those with clear insecurities). 

 

I live in Silicon Valley. I've never owned a truck, never actually owned an American car, never been inside a truck until few weeks ago, don't know anyone (friend, colleague, friend-of-a-friend) who owns a truck... So, yeah, my question was real and not a troll. I'm avid bass fisherman on CA Delta and tow my 21ft Ranger perfectly fine w/my Benz (which is great family car for 4 but totally overpriced). We're getting 7,000lbs Mastercraft watersport boat and I need a vehicle that can tow 10,000lbs safely - SUVs are out and hence my interest in half-ton trucks.

 

I'm getting here that the major ding towards RAMs is their perceived lack of reliability relatively to GM/Ford. That's something to keep in mind... I've owned MB/BMW for the last 15-20 years. MBs are rock solid, BMWs are very finicky. I expect RAM/GM/Ford to be somewhere in between (hopefully). I actually like Silverado the best exterior/interior design wise, I like 6.2 engine, etc. (hence posting on this forum) - it's just killing me that it is so cheaply made inside and yet they are asking almost $65K for it. 

Posted

I can remember trucks for work only and (gasp) people pulling boats and campers with their station wagons. They even had a utility trailer they pulled to the local lawn and garden store with their car. Like everything else over time homes, boats, RVs and even hamburgers have gotten bigger. We just have to have that 70 thousand dollar truck to handle it all. You really still get a decent truck for a reasonable price if you really need one. There’re all pretty good.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
4 hours ago, mk61hacker said:

Thanks everyone for good info (even to those with clear insecurities). 

 

I live in Silicon Valley. I've never owned a truck, never actually owned an American car, never been inside a truck until few weeks ago, don't know anyone (friend, colleague, friend-of-a-friend) who owns a truck... So, yeah, my question was real and not a troll. I'm avid bass fisherman on CA Delta and tow my 21ft Ranger perfectly fine w/my Benz (which is great family car for 4 but totally overpriced). We're getting 7,000lbs Mastercraft watersport boat and I need a vehicle that can tow 10,000lbs safely - SUVs are out and hence my interest in half-ton trucks.

 

I'm getting here that the major ding towards RAMs is their perceived lack of reliability relatively to GM/Ford. That's something to keep in mind... I've owned MB/BMW for the last 15-20 years. MBs are rock solid, BMWs are very finicky. I expect RAM/GM/Ford to be somewhere in between (hopefully). I actually like Silverado the best exterior/interior design wise, I like 6.2 engine, etc. (hence posting on this forum) - it's just killing me that it is so cheaply made inside and yet they are asking almost $65K for it. 

Your first post came off like you were trolling with backhanded questions and comments.  So since you probably are looking for a truck and don't already have one - my bad, sorry.  

 

Personally I find the Ram to be extremely gawdy inside.  I only sat in a Limited at the car show and it was clear they couldn't go an inch without gluing some badge or trim piece on.  I think a Laramie would probably be less of a visual assault.  I'm more of a "less is more" person when it comes to styling.  

 

Have you sat in a 2019 Silverado or Sierra yet?  The Sierra will he slightly upscale due to better materials and a little more bling. I rather liked the Silverado I sat in (high option / cloth LT).  I have seen a LTZ interior in person but it was right after it launched and you couldn't sit in it.  It's far nicer than the pics appear but it's not a luxury interior, it's more of a high end truck interior.   It does look and feel more expensive and better built than a Ford though. 

Posted

Speaking of gluing badges on....

My buddy is the proud new owner of a 2019 Ram Limited.

He has had 3 of the interior badges fall off.

They are applied with double sided tape! :smash:

Posted
1 hour ago, Sierra Dan said:

Speaking of gluing badges on....

My buddy is the proud new owner of a 2019 Ram Limited.

He has had 3 of the interior badges fall off.

They are applied with double sided tape! :smash:

But they have super luxurious interiors!? 

Posted
19 hours ago, mk61hacker said:

Thanks everyone for good info (even to those with clear insecurities). 

 

I live in Silicon Valley. I've never owned a truck, never actually owned an American car, never been inside a truck until few weeks ago, don't know anyone (friend, colleague, friend-of-a-friend) who owns a truck... So, yeah, my question was real and not a troll. I'm avid bass fisherman on CA Delta and tow my 21ft Ranger perfectly fine w/my Benz (which is great family car for 4 but totally overpriced). We're getting 7,000lbs Mastercraft watersport boat and I need a vehicle that can tow 10,000lbs safely - SUVs are out and hence my interest in half-ton trucks.

 

I'm getting here that the major ding towards RAMs is their perceived lack of reliability relatively to GM/Ford. That's something to keep in mind... I've owned MB/BMW for the last 15-20 years. MBs are rock solid, BMWs are very finicky. I expect RAM/GM/Ford to be somewhere in between (hopefully). I actually like Silverado the best exterior/interior design wise, I like 6.2 engine, etc. (hence posting on this forum) - it's just killing me that it is so cheaply made inside and yet they are asking almost $65K for it. 

Sounds like you'll actually be using the truck as a truck.  If you are going to be towing your boat distances or commuting long distances on a regular basis  you may consider waiting just a bit longer for the new diesel.  If you are just doing short distance towing to a nearby lake

and not commuting long distances regularly, stick with the 6.2 or 5.3  The GMC Denali will be out shortly and does have a more upscale interior and the SLT is very nice as well.  The GMC AT4 (comparable to Chevy trailboss both have 2" lift) can also be optioned with the 6.2, unlike the Silverado trailboss package.  With the towing and mostly city driving, I'd probably go with the Chevy LTZ 6.2 or SLT with the 5.3 for value.  For GMC, I think you have to get the Denali or AT4 if you want the 6.2 though.  Trade or resale wise, 4x4, Denali's and diesel do well.  If diesel's end up being what you want and you don't want to wait, the F150 Lariat 4x4 Supercrew can be had for under 50k.  They are returning 25 mpg on the highway and I think I saw 21 mpg on a tow loop (check out TFL tow loop and ike gauntlet, as well as Everyman driver on youtube).  They are not experts by any means, but they do point out lots of things you may never think about when shopping across brands.  The diesel is actually a Lion (from Range Rover) that has been redone for the F150.  I think the GM inline (straight) turbo 6 will be a more powerful and reliable motor.

 

https://www.gmc.com/trucks/2019-sierra-1500-pickup-truck 

https://www.gmc.com/gmc-life/trucks/introducing-the-first-ever-2019-sierra-at4

Posted
On 8/22/2018 at 7:49 PM, Wintersun said:

I am looking to buy a new 1500 class pickup and have spent more time than I like to think researching what is available. The trucks with the best ride and with the most configuration options are the RAM 1500 trucks. But, and it is a big but, when I researched owners complaints I often found posts by people with new or months old trucks that had an engine or transmission failure and waited months to get the parts needed and the repairs performed. I found the same with the Jeep SUV vehicles which is why I bought a Traverse instead of a Grand Cherokee.

 

The Ford trucks have a similar notoriety in terms of owners with relatively new trucks that have the doors pop open on the highway and Ford has yet to provide a fix or with leaking cabs and windows and Ford taking the position that this is not covered under warranty. That scratched Ford off my list.

 

So I am down to the new 2019 Silverado 1500 or waiting for the 2020 Toyota Tundra which will be released in the fall of 2019. I am reluctant to be a pioneer (the guys with the arrows in their backs as the old saying goes) owner of a new platform truck from anyone.  I bought a Silverado 2500HD Duramax in 2011 and I dealt with all the service bulletins and extra trips to the dealer for the first 18 months. There is still an outstanding recall for the airbags that GM has chosen to ignore for the past two years.

 

The 2017 Silverado 1500 truck has a reputation for the Chevy Shake and dealers along with GM have not been able to provide a remedy for owners. And once you buy the truck you own the problems and not GM/Chevrolet.

 

The pickups with the fewest reported problems are the ones from Toyota. I no longer need the 4,000 lb payload capacity of my 2500 truck nor its 17,200 lb towing capacity and so the Toyota Tundra is at the top of my list. I have put over 180,000 road and off road miles on each of the five Toyota Hi-Lux trucks and never had a component failure and when I sold them the gear box was solid as was the steering and every single component worked as when the trucks were new. I only had to make scheduled repairs with new timing belts or new clutches or new brakes.

 

In 6 months it will be more apparent if there are any significant problems with the 2019 Silverado 1500 trucks and which ones it may be wise to avoid based on the engine or transmission or accessories installed. If I had to buy something today it would be a 2018 Tundra as it would be the lowest risk choice. Toyota does a full revamp of its trucks every 7 years which is why I plan to hold onto my 2011 2500HD Duramax pickup until next fall.

How has your LML duramax been? We have one in the family and have had several dpf sensors fail and oil pressure sensor. It’s now at 50k miles and out of power train warranty in October. Debating on keeping it or selling. The CP4 fuel pump failures have us a little nervous. 

Posted

The oil pressure sensor surprises me but the DPF sensors don't.  the DPF and DEF systems are weak points on Ford, Dodge, and GM.  The CP4 would have me a bit concerned as well but the failure rate out of the many trucks out there is very low.  Overall I really believe the Duramax is superior to the Cummins and Powerstroke. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,864
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    fourhorses88
    Newest Member
    fourhorses88
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 875 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have ordered the car link adapter and registered for the google dev, will need to finish verification process later this evening when I get ahold of our kiddos android tablet. I will be using windows vs mac so hopefully it goes smoothly. I have zero tech background but I feel I can manage this with your write up.    Do you think it will be different for me? My truck is a 2023 GMC 1500, I have looked heavily into the AI boxes but I consistently find common complaints with lag.    Does carplay auto open now that you have it set up when you get in truck and turn it on? Or do you have to do open the app everytime? 
    • I figured you would know about it.
    • It added a cost layer to an already limited production supply. True that. 
    • Swap costs and supply/demand balance. When a barrel comes out of the ground the entire range of products are present but not all at the same percentage.    Breakdown of Refined Products The following table summarizes the approximate output from a standard 42-gallon barrel of crude oil: Product Type Gallons per Barrel Percentage of Total Gasoline 20 gallons 45% Diesel Fuel 9 gallons 21% Other Products 13 gallons 31%   Most of that diesel figure is 'straight run' or cut from the barrel. Gasoline 'cut from the barrel runs 0 to 20% at the crude. So in the crude unit there is more diesel the gasoline, usually.  The full refining experience however gives the tabled values. Ego there is half the diesel than gasoline after the 'first crack' That could be an FCC unit, or Isomax or....   Those units take heavy products and break the big ones into little ones. Those numbers are harder to get hold of but directionally it ends up the same.    Really light products are very profitable. Ethylene and Propylene to name two. Those are cracked from slightly heavier feeds like NG and Propane and Ethane. The cracker harshness determines the feed for distillation. Those feeds come from less profitable products like diesel and gasoline.    So...there is a swap cost. How much market is there TODAY and what crude am I running TODAY..... what is my process capable of always.    There is this as well. The USA uses allot more gasoline than it does diesel so in the cracker the process is tilted to gasoline production which....limits supply of diesel. OTR uses the most and it has different requirements than automotive and agricultural.  Limiting auto products.    You are correct however. It is less refined, just less of it. Allot less. 
    • Most thermostatically controlled ATF systems use a 'wax' pill just like the one in your water thermostat. They work on the expansion volume of the wax and the pill is constructed in such a way as to limit the travel to remain within that range. This means it has an opening temperature often called the 'cracking temperature' and a fully open temperature. For whatever reason oil is designated by it's fully open temperature and water by it's cracking temperature.    Between the two it the "Regulating Temperature" The entire range is about 20 F from closed to open. In your example the lower limit, opening point of 145 F then has a fully open temp of 165 F and a throttling temperature of 155 F.    Thing is, the throttling temperature needs two things to work properly. Enough system load high enough to reach the minimum and a heat sink (cooler/exchanger) large enough to prevent any load applied from exceeding the fully open temperature.    If your system exceeds the fully open temperature it is screaming MORE COOLER.    Here is the silly part of the whole thermostat system where the oil is cooled/heated by the radiator. Nothing is flowing to that system until the oil temperature reaches the cracking temperature unless it is equipped with a minimum flow bypass orifice or a bypass built into the seating surface of the plunger. That system meant to get it up to temp quicker isn't doing a thing until WORK drives if from ambient to cracking temp. One a cold winter day, like zero F, it may never get hotter than about 110 F. Sometimes not even that.    People forget or are young enough to not know that until this millennia transmissions were cooled by the radiator cold tank alone and without a thermostat at all.  In the 50's they weren't even cooled. OEMs learn everything the hard way.    When an OEM tells you the trans "Works best" between 175 F and 220 F it means works best for THEM. The transmission thermostat is fuel play. If you watch you trans temps like I do you will learn that it may take a hundred miles if you are not towing and not driving more than say 55-60 mph on a zero F day to even reach 120 F and it might sit there all day if it's colder. Yet if functions perfectly over about 100 F. It may need to get a bit warmer for the fuel and spark maps to go without an multiplier.    Worry more about too hot. Use a cooler large enough to put that thermostat in range.         
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...