Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No worries! You should swing by their shop and see what they do, they are a great group.

Posted
No worries! You should swing by their shop and see what they do, they are a great group.
If I find some free time, I will

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 3/27/2021 at 4:39 AM, Sublym808_RST said:

Been raining here quite a bit this past week. Gave her a wash this morning then installed the tailgate letter inserts from BDTrims in matte black. I like how it finishes off the look of the tailgate. Dipped the emblems a few weeks ago.

Tailgate_1.jpeg

Tailgate_2.jpeg

IMUA KAMEHAMEHA!!! 💪🏾🤙🏾

Posted (edited)

Just installed the 95mm throttle body. No results yet just drove around let the computer relearn...

 

20210329_184758.jpg

20210329_181833.jpg

Edited by Luis Marroquin
Posted
Just installed the 95mm throttle body. No results yet just drove around let the computer relearn...
 
20210329_184758.thumb.jpg.2d0d82094ae523145b0730981f360a35.jpg
20210329_181833.thumb.jpg.68b2e9d8dc138f6d3480ebffd58bb7b7.jpg
With no ability to tune, will a large throttle body yield any benefits?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Yes, more air equates to more power and the modification is not so substantial that the factory fuel mapping tables can't compensate.  The air fuel ratio will be slightly lean while the computer adjusts the fuel trims, but not dangerously so.

Posted
12 hours ago, Luis Marroquin said:

Just installed the 95mm throttle body. No results yet just drove around let the computer relearn...

 

20210329_184758.jpg

20210329_181833.jpg

5.3 or 6.2 engine?  If 5.3, did you install a 6.2 intake as well?

Posted
Yes, more air equates to more power and the modification is not so substantial that the factory fuel mapping tables can't compensate.  The air fuel ratio will be slightly lean while the computer adjusts the fuel trims, but not dangerously so.
More air would also mean more fuel since the computer will be commanding a proper AFR. If it's going to run lean then it isn't compensating by increasing the fuel for a stoich AFR. Is then questing whether or not the fuel rail and/or the fuel injectors can prevent heat soak of the last cylinder in line. Without a proper tune, and/or complete knowledge of the fuel system capabilities, is be concerned about running a larger throttle body. There's just a bunch I don't know about the current powertrain, and none of it is being discussed here. However, further discussion should have its own thread to avoid hijacking this thread. I'm interested in the mod, and the info. Hopefully you'll start a new thread.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Started to upgrade the stereo.

2 inch rear drop shackles

Added some rims and tires.

 

Been a busy week or 2 lol.

 

 

 

20210330_192915.jpg

20210330_193016.jpg

Posted
9 hours ago, Gangly said:

5.3 or 6.2 engine?  If 5.3, did you install a 6.2 intake as well?

It's the 6.2... If 5.3 you would need to install the 6.2 intake (L86)

Posted
27 minutes ago, Luis Marroquin said:

It's the 6.2... If 5.3 you would need to install the 6.2 intake (L86)

I assumed the L87 intake, but I've read reports of the L86 working properly with the L84 engine with a little bit of effort.

Posted
Just now, Gangly said:

I assumed the L87 intake, but I've read reports of the L86 working properly with the L84 engine with a little bit of effort.

Yes I'm sorry, I meant L87... 

Posted
3 hours ago, Transient said:

More air would also mean more fuel since the computer will be commanding a proper AFR. If it's going to run lean then it isn't compensating by increasing the fuel for a stoich AFR. Is then questing whether or not the fuel rail and/or the fuel injectors can prevent heat soak of the last cylinder in line. Without a proper tune, and/or complete knowledge of the fuel system capabilities, is be concerned about running a larger throttle body. There's just a bunch I don't know about the current powertrain, and none of it is being discussed here. However, further discussion should have its own thread to avoid hijacking this thread. I'm interested in the mod, and the info. Hopefully you'll start a new thread.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

It will not run at optimum stoichiometric efficiency at first.  The s-trims will try to balance out the AFR first and the l-trims will adjust overtime as long as the range is within the factory set fuel maps.  Is it optimum, no, but it works.  Proper tuning will set your trims immediately and there will be no adjustment period, or rather an extremely short adjustment period.  Again though, with no tuning you will run slightly leaner at first, maybe a couple 10ths of an AFR value, but nowhere near dangerous levels and your computer will make slight adjustments as you drive it more.  Now, if you do major mods as well like full length headers, ORY, fab'd intake, etc., your computer will not be able to adjust accordingly and will most likely start throwing codes right out of the gate.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...