Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No worries! You should swing by their shop and see what they do, they are a great group.

Posted
No worries! You should swing by their shop and see what they do, they are a great group.
If I find some free time, I will

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 3/27/2021 at 4:39 AM, Sublym808_RST said:

Been raining here quite a bit this past week. Gave her a wash this morning then installed the tailgate letter inserts from BDTrims in matte black. I like how it finishes off the look of the tailgate. Dipped the emblems a few weeks ago.

Tailgate_1.jpeg

Tailgate_2.jpeg

IMUA KAMEHAMEHA!!! 💪🏾🤙🏾

Posted (edited)

Just installed the 95mm throttle body. No results yet just drove around let the computer relearn...

 

20210329_184758.jpg

20210329_181833.jpg

Edited by Luis Marroquin
Posted
Just installed the 95mm throttle body. No results yet just drove around let the computer relearn...
 
20210329_184758.thumb.jpg.2d0d82094ae523145b0730981f360a35.jpg
20210329_181833.thumb.jpg.68b2e9d8dc138f6d3480ebffd58bb7b7.jpg
With no ability to tune, will a large throttle body yield any benefits?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Yes, more air equates to more power and the modification is not so substantial that the factory fuel mapping tables can't compensate.  The air fuel ratio will be slightly lean while the computer adjusts the fuel trims, but not dangerously so.

Posted
12 hours ago, Luis Marroquin said:

Just installed the 95mm throttle body. No results yet just drove around let the computer relearn...

 

20210329_184758.jpg

20210329_181833.jpg

5.3 or 6.2 engine?  If 5.3, did you install a 6.2 intake as well?

Posted
Yes, more air equates to more power and the modification is not so substantial that the factory fuel mapping tables can't compensate.  The air fuel ratio will be slightly lean while the computer adjusts the fuel trims, but not dangerously so.
More air would also mean more fuel since the computer will be commanding a proper AFR. If it's going to run lean then it isn't compensating by increasing the fuel for a stoich AFR. Is then questing whether or not the fuel rail and/or the fuel injectors can prevent heat soak of the last cylinder in line. Without a proper tune, and/or complete knowledge of the fuel system capabilities, is be concerned about running a larger throttle body. There's just a bunch I don't know about the current powertrain, and none of it is being discussed here. However, further discussion should have its own thread to avoid hijacking this thread. I'm interested in the mod, and the info. Hopefully you'll start a new thread.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Started to upgrade the stereo.

2 inch rear drop shackles

Added some rims and tires.

 

Been a busy week or 2 lol.

 

 

 

20210330_192915.jpg

20210330_193016.jpg

Posted
9 hours ago, Gangly said:

5.3 or 6.2 engine?  If 5.3, did you install a 6.2 intake as well?

It's the 6.2... If 5.3 you would need to install the 6.2 intake (L86)

Posted
27 minutes ago, Luis Marroquin said:

It's the 6.2... If 5.3 you would need to install the 6.2 intake (L86)

I assumed the L87 intake, but I've read reports of the L86 working properly with the L84 engine with a little bit of effort.

Posted
Just now, Gangly said:

I assumed the L87 intake, but I've read reports of the L86 working properly with the L84 engine with a little bit of effort.

Yes I'm sorry, I meant L87... 

Posted
3 hours ago, Transient said:

More air would also mean more fuel since the computer will be commanding a proper AFR. If it's going to run lean then it isn't compensating by increasing the fuel for a stoich AFR. Is then questing whether or not the fuel rail and/or the fuel injectors can prevent heat soak of the last cylinder in line. Without a proper tune, and/or complete knowledge of the fuel system capabilities, is be concerned about running a larger throttle body. There's just a bunch I don't know about the current powertrain, and none of it is being discussed here. However, further discussion should have its own thread to avoid hijacking this thread. I'm interested in the mod, and the info. Hopefully you'll start a new thread.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

It will not run at optimum stoichiometric efficiency at first.  The s-trims will try to balance out the AFR first and the l-trims will adjust overtime as long as the range is within the factory set fuel maps.  Is it optimum, no, but it works.  Proper tuning will set your trims immediately and there will be no adjustment period, or rather an extremely short adjustment period.  Again though, with no tuning you will run slightly leaner at first, maybe a couple 10ths of an AFR value, but nowhere near dangerous levels and your computer will make slight adjustments as you drive it more.  Now, if you do major mods as well like full length headers, ORY, fab'd intake, etc., your computer will not be able to adjust accordingly and will most likely start throwing codes right out of the gate.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,480 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...