Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Is it just me, or is there no where near the stock suspension rake that there was on the previous model?

my last truck was a 2017 Sierra and the lower front rake was extremely noticeable, with this truck it almost looks dead nuts even.

mine is an RST, does that change the suspension height front or rear from any other trims? I haven’t noticed except realizing it doesn’t look like it has a rake like my ‘17 did. 

I just bought cheap 285/45/22 all seasons for cost at the moment, but want to swap to larger AT or MT tires at some point, looks like I could fit considerably more tire in front and rear without any suspension mods? 

Edited by Brown324
Add info
Posted
A spacer clears the caliper but now the bad thing is your truck isn't hub centric anymore and is now lug centric.  Gm trucks don't like to be lug centric.  The max spacer thickness that can be used is 3mm (1/8") to remain hub centric.  There's only one place I know that makes a 3mm spacers for these trucks.

I don’t care to have spacers to begin with, that’s why they are sold. Currently installing the new setup. I will post pics when done


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
2 hours ago, Brown324 said:

Is it just me, or is there no where near the stock suspension rake that there was on the previous model?

my last truck was a 2017 Sierra and the lower front rake was extremely noticeable, with this truck it almost looks dead nuts even.

mine is an RST, does that change the suspension height front or rear from any other trims? I haven’t noticed except realizing it doesn’t look like it has a rake like my ‘17 did. 

No, your suspension is not different with the RST.

 

The rake on my RST Z71 with 20's is barely noticeable. It's much less than the K2s, for sure. 

Posted

New setup on. And I love it

Black Rhino Roku 17x9.5 +12 offset

315/70/17 BFG ko2

Very minimal rub, barely touches the back mud flap on the inner side

I’m on a 2 inch ready lift level

e83f606d759a3c1f7c909d6abc0662bf.jpg

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
Added 1.5 Motofab level, 1 1/2" wheel spacers. Stock tires going today for 285/60r20 Toyo R/T's 
 

 

20190723_194619.jpg

20190723_194434.jpg

20190723_194508.jpg

20190723_194606.jpg

Edited by anthony2558
edit photos
  • Like 5
Posted
34 minutes ago, anthony2558 said:
Added 1.5 Motofab level, 1 1/2" wheel spacers. Stock tires going today for 285/60r20 Toyo R/T's 
 

 

20190723_194619.jpg

20190723_194434.jpg

20190723_194508.jpg

20190723_194606.jpg

What brand spacers you get 

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, dctackett10 said:

What brand spacers you get 

Got YitaMotor off amazon. Normally i purchase Bora, but wasnt sure 1 1/2" would work, and didnt want to go threw the hassle of returning with Bora. But I have to say that this brand I got off Amazon seems to be just as good. 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07C9ZFB4H/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

Note: I did not have to cut any studs for these to work. These stock wheels are notched in the back so any stud that pokes out after the spacer has a place to go. 

Edited by anthony2558
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, anthony2558 said:

Got YitaMotor off amazon. Normally i purchase Bora, but wasnt sure 1 1/2" would work, and didnt want to go threw the hassle of returning with Bora. But I have to say that this brand I got off Amazon seems to be just as good. 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07C9ZFB4H/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o02_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

 

Note: I did not have to cut any studs for these to work. These stock wheels are notched in the back so any stud that pokes out after the spacer has a place to go. 

Any noticeable vibrations at highway speeds?

Posted
29 minutes ago, RUSSH said:

Any noticeable vibrations at highway speeds?

None. I drive 35 mins every day at an average speed of 65-70mph and have no vibrations to report.

  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, anthony2558 said:

None. I drive 35 mins every day at an average speed of 65-70mph and have no vibrations to report.

Care to send a link to where you got em from 

Posted
24 minutes ago, dctackett10 said:

Care to send a link to where you got em from 

Look 3 posts up from yours. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
    • It was all part of the tiny bit of fuel savings it goes towards what was mandated by the government. Much like cylinder deactivation. That was relaxed by the recent administration. All that doesn’t help the individual buyer. But as a whole helps the manufacturer to try to reach the previous ridiculous past mileage per gallon mandate. So yes it was mandated and added cost to the vehicle. 
    • You do realize that auto stop/start...was never mandated by the fed...right?     EPA Says It's 'Killing' Stop-Start, and Here's What Automakers Have to Say   "Start‑stop technology has never been federally mandated, and the EPA’s recent action removes regulatory incentives associated with it rather than prohibiting its use."
    • Anytime the government mandates something, you can bet on it being absolutely senseless.
    • just logged my best MPG for one leg this am - drove home from the Denver Airport, 45 min drive - all freeway, lots of traffic so speeds were limited and some stop and go, got 17.7 for the ~30 mile trip.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...