Jump to content

Jeep Gladiator - Nail in the coffin for the ZR2?

Chris walker

Recommended Posts

Chris walker Enthusiast

Chris walker

Posted
Posted

I'm a huge fan of the ZR2 and am heavily considering a ZR2 or a Trail boss for my next purchase. I wont buy a Jeep product after their latest JL release nightmare so Im not a Jeep fan boy in disguise. 've been wondering, however,  if the Gladiator isnt the nail in the coffin for the ZR2.

 

Where the ZR2 better:

-MUCH more reliable

-Better power plants

-Better shocks

-Better on road driving (potentially)

-will cost less

 

Where will the Gladiator be better::

-Aftermarket will be insane

-Lift tires will be zero issues. You should be able to put up to 37's with factor warranty mopar lift

-Light years ahead in tech

-Removable top (some may not see this as an improvement)

-Industry leading towing

-Off road focused interior

-Much better gearing options

-Much better rear seat room

 

Where they are equal:

-Both will be insanely capable off road (ZR2/Rubicon will be comparable)

 

What will drive the serious off road market to purchase a ZR2? 

 

 

 

rkj__ Enthusiast

rkj__

Posted
Posted

I think the ZR2 will provide a much quieter and smoother on road ride, as well as a smoother high speed off road ride.  Wind noise will be much lower in the ZR2, with it's fixed roof.  It will be a better value IMO.  The styling of the ZR2 is much smoother, and more cohesive.  I believe the ZR2 will be easier to live with day to day for many buyers.

 

There is no doubt though, that the Rubicon's tow rating crushes that of the ZR2.  It can tow a full 2,000lb more.  And, the ability to add 35s stock, and 37s, with an easy to install, fairly inexpensive lift  is another huge advantage.  That's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to aftermarket upgrades.  The Rubicon will definitely have the advantage when it comes to rock crawling, with its solid axles, disconnectable swaybar, and bigger tires.  While the Jeep may shine off road, you will have to trade off some on road noise and comfort.  You also get somewhat polarizing styling, that will leave some shoppers with the impression that the Gladiator looks like a hacked up Wrangler. 

 

It will be fun to watch buyers and the media put the ZR2 Bison head to head with the Gladiator Rubicon.

i82much Enthusiast

i82much

Posted
Posted

I have owned two Rubicons, and three GM trucks.  No GM truck is going to keep up with a Rubicon-based truck off road.  I am back in a GM truck because Jeep makes junk, but let's not kid ourselves - the Wrangler setup with sfa, lockers, and disconnects is shockingly capable.

  • 2 weeks later...
j-ten-ner Senior Enthusiast

j-ten-ner

Posted
Posted

I consider the new "Gladiator" a fail.

Jeep could have nailed it if they had the balls to bring this concept truck into production.

I'd be all over it.

 

JeepCrewChiefConcept.thumb.jpg.a56456f558276a6f911badd0df143400.jpg5c1577cfe114d_jeep-crew-chief-715-concept-rear-side-view(1).thumb.jpg.fb9cd2db627f8dd8e0cd2e68825c070c.jpg

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • 4 weeks later...
madcratebuilder Enthusiast

madcratebuilder

Posted
Posted

The Gladiator is 3" narrower, 10" longer with 11" more wheelbase compared to the ZR2.  Depending on  what it drives like and price has a major impact on success.

  • 1 month later...
Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted

Sizing up the Jeep Gladiator to a Chevy Colorado ZR2, is like comparing a Toyota Prius to a Challenger Hellcat! :smash:

Apples and Oranges all day long.

The ZR2 and Gladiator both look cool but the similarity ends there.

  • 2 months later...
Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted

The gladiator is at least another 10K more than A diesel equipped ZR2 or the new Bison version.

Would gladly take one of those two over the 60K Jeep any day unless all I wanted to do was rock climb.

  • 4 weeks later...
Likarok Senior Enthusiast

Likarok

Posted
Posted

I don't think the ZR2 has anything to worry about. The fact that the Jeep looks like a Jeep is all that has to be said. 

MaverickZ71 Senior Enthusiast

MaverickZ71

Posted
Posted

Bull.  Recent magazine reviews have already ranked the Colorado/ZR2/Bison above the much-ballyhooed newer Gladiator and Ranger, not to mention the ancient Tacoma and Frontier.  Besides, only Jeep fanboys will pay $60K for a midsize Gladiator Rubicon when a few more bucks will get you into a fullsize Raptor or Power Wagon.  TFL did a towing test with the Gladiator and thought it sounded like it was going to blow its engine towing it's rated capacity.  A regular cab Gladiator Rubicon may have gone over better--the longer wheelbase of the crew cab kills its breakover angle.   

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

The reviews I read complimented the new Jeep. I know around here Jeeps are popular and hold their value. Not my thing, but that’s me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MaverickZ71 Senior Enthusiast

MaverickZ71

Posted
Posted
On 12/15/2018 at 3:55 PM, j-ten-ner said:

I consider the new "Gladiator" a fail.

Jeep could have nailed it if they had the balls to bring this concept truck into production.

I'd be all over it.

 

JeepCrewChiefConcept.thumb.jpg.a56456f558276a6f911badd0df143400.jpg5c1577cfe114d_jeep-crew-chief-715-concept-rear-side-view(1).thumb.jpg.fb9cd2db627f8dd8e0cd2e68825c070c.jpg

 

so long

j-ten-ner

THIS x 1000.  The Gladiator does nothing for me, but this truck has got it all going on.  

Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted

The hardcore Jeepsters will gladly hand over their hard earned 50-60k for one.

It is a novelty vehicle much like Hummer H2s and 3's  More of a status symbol than anything.

I see so many jeeps with large tires running down the road detailed out to the max with not a spec of dirt on them.

  • 2 months later...
BIGDOGx Senior Enthusiast

BIGDOGx

Posted
Posted
On 6/13/2019 at 3:20 PM, Sierra Dan said:

The hardcore Jeepsters will gladly hand over their hard earned 50-60k for one.

It is a novelty vehicle much like Hummer H2s and 3's  More of a status symbol than anything.

I see so many jeeps with large tires running down the road detailed out to the max with not a spec of dirt on them.

I watched a youtube review of this jeep vs. the zr2 bison and while the bison essentially was better in almost every facet you could tell they were jeep fans. Too me i wouldn't pay a nickel for that jeep as it is by a far margin the ugliest disproportionate land yacht on the road today, and unless you have ideal conditions" Like a pathway that a 747 can fit down " That jeep simply wouldn't fit on most off road trails. I don't count rolling through mud puddles and climbing over a boulder as off roading. Driving down trails that only snowmobiles and quads use is what i call off roading.

 

It is so oddly long and terrible looking it is going to take another 20-30 grand of aftermarket buys to make it look halfway decent imo. The Bison is essentially so much nicer looking and better performing along with being way more practical imo, only a huge jeep fanboy could come to the conclusion that the gladiator is a better choice between the two.

Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, BIGDOGx said:

I watched a youtube review of this jeep vs. the zr2 bison and while the bison essentially was better in almost every facet you could tell they were jeep fans. Too me i wouldn't pay a nickel for that jeep as it is by a far margin the ugliest disproportionate land yacht on the road today, and unless you have ideal conditions" Like a pathway that a 747 can fit down " That jeep simply wouldn't fit on most off road trails. I don't count rolling through mud puddles and climbing over a boulder as off roading. Driving down trails that only snowmobiles and quads use is what i call off roading.

 

It is so oddly long and terrible looking it is going to take another 20-30 grand of aftermarket buys to make it look halfway decent imo. The Bison is essentially so much nicer looking and better performing along with being way more practical imo, only a huge jeep fanboy could come to the conclusion that the gladiator is a better choice between the two.

Not quite as ugly as the Pontiac Aztek, but close!  LOL

My point exactly. The thing is hideous for a modern vehicle. It looks like a 4 door version of the 70s Jeep Honcho  :loser:

BIGDOGx Senior Enthusiast

BIGDOGx

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Sierra Dan said:

Not quite as ugly as the Pontiac Aztek, but close!  LOL

My point exactly. The thing is hideous for a modern vehicle. It looks like a 4 door version of the 70s Jeep Honcho  :loser:

True the aztek is without question the ugliest duckling gm has ever produced imo, how they even sold one model to an actual paying customer is a testament to the salesman that sold it haha.

 

That Jeep though is so horribly long that i could almost see the frame flexing when they did the bump section at 35-40mph. The Bison handled it no sweat with the shocks that thing has on it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined

  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,284 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Sugar Bears 2015 GMC Terrain SLE-2 2.4 AWD

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      286,740 Mile Services   8/6/2026   New AC Compressor. Refrigerant oil and dye, evacuate and charge system.  New exhaust system from cat back.  New Iridium plugs plus replace #3 coil Repair/rewire headlamp wiring (passenger side) and replace all forward bulbs. Polish lenses of both assemblies.  Pull rear rotors, clean and adjust parking assembly. Inspect, clean and grease front calipers. Check pads and shoes.  4 wheel power bleed of brake system. Dot 4 Reset idle speed 50 rpm higher New Serpentine belt.    Will need new pads in the rear in about 5K more miles.    Tax Title and License out the door just short of a grand.    AC clutch had bitten the dust. 1 year warranty on the pick and save replacement. Thing will make a Polar Bear cry Uncle.  He spent quite some time on the wiring. It was in the harness and he does nothing half. I got off cheap. I have considerable more light down the road. Sylvania Silver Star replacements.  Gas seal between the porcelain and shell of plug #3 was blown, cooked the coil. That was the cold miss.  Love the new exhaust. I can sneak into the neighborhood again.  Nice to have a working parking brake again. Belle Tire never got it done. That was disappointing.    This was one of her bigger bills and still way cheaper than a payment even given the oil consumption. This thing cost me under a hundred a month in repairs and normal routine costs. What is my incentive to replace it? 🤔           
    • AidenVorpagel
      cam upgrade in CA

      By AidenVorpagel · Posted

      hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • B14Sierra
      Noise after AFM delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Did you figure it out?
    • B14Sierra
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By B14Sierra · Posted

      Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...