Jump to content

Towing with a 91/93 Octane Tune? Worth it?


Ezekiel2517

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all. Ive tried researching this and cannot find a clear answer so I thought I would ask it more directly.  Does anyone have a Black Bear or Diablew 93 Octane tune that is used for towing?  I have a 2014 GMC 5.3/3.42/z71 and tow my 4500lb (empty) RV and it feels very anemic.  It can do the job, but it is a struggle, especially in a headwind.  6mpg at times.   I know that one should expect this to an extent, but I long for more oomph.  And better shifting  Even in manual mode the transmission sucks.   Will the 93 tune provide any tangible benefit for towing?  Or is it more for seat-of-your-pants feeling driving fun? 

 

Im considering getting the tune as a stopgap between this truck and my next.  Hoping for some less chromey trim options to be released on future 6.2 models.  Right now the LTZs and SLTs are too shiney for my taste. 

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I don't have any experience with a tune on a 2014+ truck..but I'm wondering, do you have stock wheels and tires? 2wd or 4wd?  I assume 4wd because of the Z71 but I'm not sure if that was 4wd only. 

 

I think your best bet is 4.10 gears with a tune.  Hopefully others have more experience towing in a tuned truck. 

Posted

Yes, 4wd.  I have 33" tires so that effectively reduces my axle ratio a little bit.  I would love to do 4.10s or 3.73s but the cost just does not seem worth it.  have to do both differentials I have heard. 

Posted

Due to your increased tire size, your truck now feels like it has 3.08 gears.

Going back to OEM size tires would boost your truck back to feeling like 3.42.

 

That would be the easiest thing you can do. But I suppose that is not an option for you?

Posted

I’ve got a 015 Silverado crew LT 5.3 3.42s like yours mines leveled 285/70/17s

 

I’ve towed before and after with my Blackbear tune I’m running a 91 tune and a tranny tune.

 

  Before with stock wheels/tires not leveled after with current set up.

 

The biggest difference is how the tranny shifts loaded and unloaded. Way better.

 

I notice minimal power gains while towing. Definitely more “sporty” unloaded.

 

Loves summer blend E85 definitely feel in the pants will break the rears loose on 91 it won’t.

Supposedly a well tuned 5.3 on 100% E85 gains 30+ horses.

MPGs take a major hit running E85 so I have to figure cost per mile between the two.

 

Played Mr.Rescue for my buddy he lost a tire on his 79 T/A couple hours North of home. My 20’ tilt bed weights a good 1800+ with toolbox, ect. Car weights 34-3500 so we’re in the same ball park trailer weight wise. According to the DIC I was well North of 10mpg and even up over 12mpg loaded on the two lane black tops running 65-70. I didn’t hand calculate but DIC is usually fairly close. So I’m guessing you’re really buckin the wind.

 

I pulled close to 10k home 40 miles that trip sucked btw I was way down in the single digits then.

 

My plow/tow/work/farm truck is a 01 reg cab 2500HD 6.0 4.10 4L80E 285/70/17s horsepower and torque wise it’s close to a stock K2 5.3 minus all the obvious reasons why I’d rather tow with it and not comparing 1/2 to 3/4 ton stuff I will say it gets moving ALOT easier from a dead stop and maintains speed on a incline better. Comparing towing the same load on the same trailer on the same roads.

 

I’d venture to say if you talked to a driveline specialist they might even recommend a steeper gear for a K2 with the 6speed than a non K2 with a 4speed do to final gear ratio?  New F250/F350 even offer a 4.30 from the factory now. 

 

 

Posted

Those mpgs when towing seem awfully low. I have a 17 CC 4x4 5.3 with 7” lift and 35’s and I pull my toy hauler at close to 9000lbs regularly and I can get close to 10mpg going up hill against the wind. Mine to has 3.42 gears. I got a 89 Diablo tune from Diablew and it completely changed the truck. So yes a tune will make towing much better for you. Not sure you need to go with the 93 tune unless you absolutely want to. Lots of guys stick with the lower octane tune to save on gas money and because the differences in performance arent that significant. 

 

With that said though I am getting my truck regeared on the 27 of this month. I do a lot of towing and hauling and it will be a huge benefit to me. Worth every penny imo if you tow a lot

Posted

I would love to get 10mpg towing.   I can only do that on the flat with a tailwind it seems.   It seems worse in the winter but I don't really know if they change the gas in Texas or not.  

 

with an 89 tune can u run 87 for day to day driving or will it mess up your engine?  

 

I'm not sure if the $2k+ for new gears would be worth it on 33s.  seems like it would be better to save for my next truck, since this one is going on 6 years old.  i  really want a 6.2 max tow.  if only it could be had with trailboss package...

Posted

Yeah my gas mileage has taken a hit since it’s gotten cold. 

If you go through Diablew for your tuner just tell him you wanna run 87 and he’ll tune it for that octane. I run 89 so that’s how he tuned it. 

If you’re thinking of getting rid of your truck then gears is a waste. 

Posted

Thanks for all the info.  I may try the tune.  Its a minimal investment to add a little fun and maybe capability to this truck.  If it doesnt work for towing, at least it will be more fun to drive.

Posted
4 minutes ago, TexasGMCZ71 said:

Thanks for all the info.  I may try the tune.  Its a minimal investment to add a little fun and maybe capability to this truck.  If it doesnt work for towing, at least it will be more fun to drive.

I have a 15 , 5.3 , 3.42 , bbp tune ,headers , custom exhaust,  

 I dont tow as much as I did before but it does decent . The tune is helpful and can be customized 

Posted

Damn!!!  I was about to buy the Intune i3 on ebay refurbed for $189 and they just sold out :-(

 

 

Posted

Thanks for the post. I was also wondering the same thing. Have a Denali with 37's and just bought a 7000 pound dry trailer. Was going to use my Bully dog to tune for 94 octane but at $1.52 liter/$5.74 gallon not sure it's worth the change.

Posted
On ‎2019‎-‎03‎-‎13 at 10:14 AM, TexasGMCZ71 said:

Hello all. Ive tried researching this and cannot find a clear answer so I thought I would ask it more directly.  Does anyone have a Black Bear or Diablew 93 Octane tune that is used for towing?  I have a 2014 GMC 5.3/3.42/z71 and tow my 4500lb (empty) RV and it feels very anemic.  It can do the job, but it is a struggle, especially in a headwind.  6mpg at times.   I know that one should expect this to an extent, but I long for more oomph.  And better shifting  Even in manual mode the transmission sucks.   Will the 93 tune provide any tangible benefit for towing?  Or is it more for seat-of-your-pants feeling driving fun? 

 

Im considering getting the tune as a stopgap between this truck and my next.  Hoping for some less chromey trim options to be released on future 6.2 models.  Right now the LTZs and SLTs are too shiney for my taste. 

Your 5.3 (3.42) should have more than enough power to pull your trailer.   I pull a similar load with my 4.3 (3.42) and appreciate that higher speeds and headwinds will burn the fuel and play havoc on performance.  I am not provoking debate about engine size.  I'm suggesting that a tune may not be the answer to your towing concerns.  The challenges of pulling a 8'X10' sail behind you increases dramatically with speed and wind. Get a tune to tweak your performance but don't be disappointed if the challenges of towing on a windy day haven't improved.

Posted

I get anywhere from 8.5-10MPG towing my trailer and SXS. Its about 3500lbs. Towing 7000lbs I got about 8MPG @ 65-70MPH. This is all with tow/haul mode, I wouldn't tow without that mode enabled as it slows down the shifts and gets rid of the lock up in most points.

IMG_20181223_132644.thumb.jpg.d359692e9e5800ac9f39a06515a8d426.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 534 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...