Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m talking about these:

0e7960881a29e6ec679799df72a41cfc.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yes they will fit, but the lock/unlock button wont work requires a proximity sensor and proximity key and all the wiring harnesses


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 4/22/2019 at 1:21 PM, Razr20 said:

Hey guys and gals. New to the forums with my first post. I have a 2016 Sierra 1500 Denali with the all chrome grill and looking to swap with the All Terrain black grill if anyone is interested.

20190330_182444.jpg

I have a black 2016 all terrain. I really want a Denali grill. I’ll ship mine to you if you ship yours to me?

Posted
On 9/13/2019 at 11:19 AM, BBrown said:

I have a black 2016 all terrain. I really want a Denali grill. I’ll ship mine to you if you ship yours to me?

I'm seling my denali grill let me know if you're interested.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Phantom_ss13 said:

I'm seling my denali grill let me know if you're interested.

30 minutes ago, Phantom_ss13 said:

I'm seling my denali grill let me know if you're interested.

Shoot me a text. 907 222 3030

Posted

I’ll be honest I wanted to keep my smug Denali grill but hated all the chrome. So I took it apart and painted the grill sections black. I think it came out great.

 

37C8D828-2BC6-4375-BB34-2E0EBE14839A.jpeg

7D6AF735-1CE2-44B9-86FF-542E7B42FA5C.jpeg

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I may have to just paint it. People were doing the swap before I bought the truck and now that I have one..... Nothing. Figures LOL!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 9/13/2019 at 12:19 PM, BBrown said:

I have a black 2016 all terrain. I really want a Denali grill. I’ll ship mine to you if you ship yours to me?

Still want to swap grills?

Posted
On 9/22/2019 at 8:32 PM, Razr20 said:

I may have to just paint it. People were doing the swap before I bought the truck and now that I have one..... Nothing. Figures LOL!

paint it.. the photo difference above looks awesome.

I'm sure you'll be happy with it, just prep it correctly, take your time and dont put it on thick..

  • Like 1
Posted

This is why I bought an All Terrain twice in a row. The GMT900 All Terrain was nicer looking than the Denali, same holds true for the K2's and now the T1. Sorry Denali guys, but GM made the 2nd highest trim level the nicer looking truck, on the outside. I know you guys are nicer on the inside. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/7/2019 at 1:33 PM, L86 All Terrain said:

 I know you guys are nicer on the inside. 

You really think so?

I think the AT4s that I've been in look better than the Denalis do..

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 5/2/2019 at 2:31 PM, camcamaro1991 said:

Thank you, the pics dont do it justice, unfortunately the grille surrounds are  NOT sold individually hence why I had to buy an entire factory take of black AT. I was not willing to paint it, or paint over my Denali chrome. 

 

however if your order a AT grille new they DO NOT COME PAINTED, they have to be paint matched, so it gets expensive quick and added PPF to the surround. Infact the entire front and full hood and fenders have PPF you cant even tell its installed. 

I’ll take it. I know it’s been 2 years but hoping you still have it. 

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...