Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So several of you have added the 1.5" motofab leveling kit. Some even a 2" on the 2019+ fb group. I am wondering how is your suspension responding and how many miles have you been running with the leveling spacer? Recently I started to notice a trend on the trailboss owners opting for the 1" instead to stay on a safer side. I have the 1.5" sitting in my garage and now am having second doubts on installing it or ordering a 1". I really want to just bite the bullet and go with the 1.5". My old 17 z71 ltz had a 2.5" and developed a steering noise after a couple of miles. So overall how is your truck doing; any noises or cv axle leaks?

Posted

1.5" motofab  on my Trail Boss with about 750 miles........no unusual noises or problems to report.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for the quick reply! Hopefully more people report their stats too and this can serve others like me as an assurance!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
6 hours ago, asalinasz39 said:

So several of you have added the 1.5" motofab leveling kit. Some even a 2" on the 2019+ fb group. I am wondering how is your suspension responding and how many miles have you been running with the leveling spacer? Recently I started to notice a trend on the trailboss owners opting for the 1" instead to stay on a safer side. I have the 1.5" sitting in my garage and now am having second doubts on installing it or ordering a 1". I really want to just bite the bullet and go with the 1.5". My old 17 z71 ltz had a 2.5" and developed a steering noise after a couple of miles. So overall how is your truck doing; any noises or cv axle leaks?

1 1/2 motofab on mine. 5k miles and smooth as can be! No problems at all. Zero regrets!

20190325_075841_HDR.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Ben Berkenpas said:

1 1/2 motofab on mine. 5k miles and smooth as can be! No problems at all. Zero regrets!

20190325_075841_HDR.jpg

 

19 hours ago, destrada127 said:

5k miles here too on my AT4 and I've had no issues whatsoever6678ceb6aa5bbd0592e73b1e71ad0f4a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

Wooow awesome guys! Trucks are looking great

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Chred said:

Around 1500 miles since installing the 1.5” Motofab.  No issues yet

E03999DC-16BE-42EB-80D1-3EE3B8387DB5.jpeg

What Re the wheels and tires you are running, looks great 

Posted
10 hours ago, Jmonty said:

What Re the wheels and tires you are running, looks great 

Thanks! They are the Fuel Assault rims with Toyo Open Country AT2 305/55/20

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Can you post the link to the kit for the 2019 silverado? are you just doing the front? appreciate it and good luck!

 

 

Www.motofablifts.com

Posted
On 4/24/2019 at 9:20 PM, Ben Berkenpas said:

1 1/2 motofab on mine. 5k miles and smooth as can be! No problems at all. Zero regrets!

20190325_075841_HDR.jpg

Did you get it alligned after the motofab lift? If not have you noticed your tires wearing unevenly?

Posted

You should always align after any suspension work, I did after my 1.5" install and it was off by looking at the before and after alignment sheet, and it drove better after the alignment.

  • Like 1
Posted

Absolutely need an alignment. It will drive fine without it, but you will get uneven tire wear for sure. I didn't get mine in for the alignment for a couple hundred miles and that didn't cause any problems but I wouldn't wait too long! 

  • Like 1
Posted

Heck mine drives better now with a fresh alignment with the leveling kit than it did brand new. Now i'm not saying the leveling kit made my truck better, i'm just skeptical to how well my truck was actually aligned from the factory. I have the 1" motofab kit on mine. I did get an esc trouble fault running through the mud at my property the other day but once i turned the truck off it went away. I haven't been able to replicate the issue again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • LOL west coast they need to see what the midwest actually has.  We have been holding at 2.99 for a few weeks now.  Even by work they have come down to 3.02 for the past week.
    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...