Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, Colossus said:

Bulletproof?  No.  They have their issues.   Plenty of disappointed crapota owners out there. I'm one of them.  But they certainly have a better reputation than any of the others out there, that's true. 

we've been patiently waiting more than six months now for you to list all of their issues......Son.  

Posted

 

6 hours ago, 1997SierraSLT said:

we've been patiently waiting more than six months now for you to list all of their issues......Son.  

 

Wow, how sad.  You have no ability to go do your own research.  Grow a set, please.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Colossus said:

 

 

Wow, how sad.  You have no ability to go do your own research.  Grow a set, please.

oh, I have.....Son.  Folks over at the Tundra site are just really enjoying life and their ultra reliable and functioning as intended vehicles.  

 

I've also now learned you can't win an argument with an idiot

Edited by 1997SierraSLT
Posted

My 2020 6.2L makes a similar noise. Just over 5,000 km on it. GM says it’s normal and not doing damage?

Posted
20 hours ago, 1997SierraSLT said:

oh, I have.....Son.  Folks over at the Tundra site are just really enjoying life and their ultra reliable and functioning as intended vehicles.  

 

I've also now learned you can't win an argument with an idiot

Or someone who uses the word "Son" when talking to people on a public forum board. Seriously what are you 12 years old, are the rubber and glue cracks next here, grow up!

Posted
On 9/15/2020 at 9:08 PM, 1997SierraSLT said:

Boring but bulletproof and reliable so you can actually enjoy life.  Plus the Toyotas have the highest resale value on the market.  
 

GM truck owners are going to be left with a giant money pit once the warranty expires.

 

On 9/16/2020 at 2:16 AM, Colossus said:

Bulletproof?  No.  They have their issues.   Plenty of disappointed crapota owners out there. I'm one of them.  But they certainly have a better reputation than any of the others out there, that's true. 

 

I had a 2013 Tundra 4x4 until I traded it in for my 19 Silverado Z71 LT.  Only issues I ever encountered with the Tundra was the 4x4 not engaging properly and it flashing on the dash.  Then having to wait for it "unlock" or try some other method to undo the 4x4.  Silverado had the same issue years ago.

 

No other issues with my Tundra.  It's bulletproof compared to these newer Silverado's.

Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Vigilante375 said:

 

 

I had a 2013 Tundra 4x4 until I traded it in for my 19 Silverado Z71 LT.  Only issues I ever encountered with the Tundra was the 4x4 not engaging properly and it flashing on the dash.  Then having to wait for it "unlock" or try some other method to undo the 4x4.  Silverado had the same issue years ago.

 

No other issues with my Tundra.  It's bulletproof compared to these newer Silverado's.

Yes, it is true, the 2-HI to 4-HI and 4-HI to 2-LO will not always engage properly on the Toyotas if you do not "cycle" the transfer case actuator and front differential actuator on a monthly basis.  This cycling maneuver is clearly outlined within the owners manual.  The shift yokes within each actuator tend to gum up from lack of use and it can take several cycling attempts to free them up.  

Edited by 1997SierraSLT
Posted
1 hour ago, 1997SierraSLT said:

Yes, it is true, the 2-HI to 4-HI and 4-HI to 2-LO will not always engage properly on the Toyotas if you do not "cycle" the transfer case actuator and front differential actuator on a monthly basis.  This cycling maneuver is clearly outlined within the owners manual.  The shift yokes within each actuator tend to gum up from lack of use and it can take several cycling attempts to free them up.  

I actually found it to happen more below 50 degree's outside, whether or not the engine/trans was cold or warm.  Above that, it would always engage and disengage properly whether the engine/trans was cold or warm..  I had to let it sit overnight before it would free up a majority of the time.

Posted

Ok so I can't guarantee this will fix your issue, but I'm pretty sure it was mine. My truck made a similar noise to the video on the original post, and I could not figure it out. GM was no help. So, to anyone who has this noise and it's not just your DI system, CHECK YOUR IGNITION COILS AND PLUG WIRES! Somehow one of the plugs on mine loosened and was arking to the header, causing the tick (I believe) and when the engine warmed up, for whatever reason it stopped arking. This could also be a cause for poor, choppy idle if the plug is far enough away from the spark plug head. Probably not a fix all for everyone, but worth a shot. 

Posted

my idle started to get pretty rough around the 12k mark. I have a friend who is a GM tech so we hooked up the scanner and the truck had a misfire at idle but wasn't enough to set a hard fault. 

Gm can say all they want that this noise isn't doing any damage but this is always their default statement with motor issues.  I can almost 100% guarantee  that its a lazy lifter that GM knows about but has no interest in fixing for people.  You can tell its a lifter issues because the noise almost goes away with a fresh oil change.  You may not see any major failures from this right away but a lazy lifter WILL cause issues down the road. By the time it does it will be on your dime. 

Posted
1 hour ago, ct_corey said:

my idle started to get pretty rough around the 12k mark. I have a friend who is a GM tech so we hooked up the scanner and the truck had a misfire at idle but wasn't enough to set a hard fault. 

Gm can say all they want that this noise isn't doing any damage but this is always their default statement with motor issues.  I can almost 100% guarantee  that its a lazy lifter that GM knows about but has no interest in fixing for people.  You can tell its a lifter issues because the noise almost goes away with a fresh oil change.  You may not see any major failures from this right away but a lazy lifter WILL cause issues down the road. By the time it does it will be on your dime. 

It is called MTBF.  Hence the reason why GM offers a 3yr/36,000 mile warranty.   If GM produced a quality product, their warranty would be considerably longer.  The GM actuaries determined a few years back their 5yr/60,000 mile warranty was reducing profitability due to vehicle components failing before the warranty period expired.  So, GM in true fashion simply reduced their warranty period.  

 

In addition to offering a reduced warranty, GM has also patented the "cannot duplicate", "functioning as intended", and "the ECM did not record any trouble codes, therefore your problem doesn't exist".  

Posted

I may be way off track here but, any possibility of this being carbon build up? 

Posted

The new 3rd gen tacomas do have some issues. Not nearly as many as the new Silverado. I replaced my truck with a 2015 Tacoma(last year of the second gen). Its not the most fancy truck but at least it runs right and the brakes don't randomly fail. 

 

Not sure why people are giving heat on the tundra interior. The new Silverado interior isn't that much better and its a newly designed truck. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,189 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...