Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I called GMC directly and they said that the mismatched height in the pedals was a "Safety Feature" that was engineered into the vehicle. Also no dealerships in my area would be willing to modify the height because it would invalidate the warranty. If I got aftermarket pedals that would also void the warrantee.

Posted
23 hours ago, FailSafe said:

If I got aftermarket pedals that would also void the warrantee.

I don't think that's accurate, but I'm not a lawyer. However, I'd definitely fight it in court if it came down to it because I could see the opposite side. That because the pedals were offset so much it made it more difficult to brake since I have to readjust my foot and then brake. That's an increase in response time which could be critical in avoiding an accident.

 

Anyways, it appears Jeeps have this issue too. I saw these on Amazon and a lot of the reviews echo our complaints as well.

https://www.amazon.com/Hooke-Road-Heightening-2007-2018-Unlimited/dp/B07DHK34PW/ref=sr_1_7?dchild=1&keywords=car+pedal+extender&qid=1601571568&sr=8-7

Posted

This was really bugging me, so I went out and measured all three of my vehicles. Basically, the positioning (in respect to each other) of the brake and gas petals were the exact same. I even went as far as measuring the height difference and on all three vehicles the brake petal is 2 1/2" higher than the gas pedal. All three vehicles are made by different manufacturers. 

 

I have never noticed a difference in any vehicle that I have ever driven. I would think this would be a standard for safety reason, but who knows?

 

Maybe the distance you are seated from the pedals is affecting you more than the difference in distance between the brake and gas pedals? Perhaps you are seated either closer or further away from the pedals and that is what is affecting you?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I agree with the OP,  he’s not crazy...
 

2020 Silverado RST and the pedals are way too far out of plane. Much different than my 2019 Tahoe RST.

 

I’m cutting and welding...and I could give two ****** on anyone’s opinion of that...

  • Like 1
Posted
I agree with the OP,  he’s not crazy...
 
2020 Silverado RST and the pedals are way too far out of plane. Much different than my 2019 Tahoe RST.
 
I’m cutting and welding...and I could give two ****** on anyone’s opinion of that...

If you do it, please post back on how you get the brake pedal off. I’ve considered this myself.
Posted

I don’t like the new gas pedal shape and position.  It’s too small and too far away from the trans tunnel.  I wear size 11 shoes and my foot can slide off the right side of the gas pedal.  On my ‘15 and ‘18 I could rest my foot against the trans tunnel and on the gas pedal.    

Posted

Maybe I’m wrong but, is there a height adjustment rod for the brake pedal? Older cars had em, not sure if they’ve gone away.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

It's funny, at first I hated it and I was seriously contemplating getting the blocks I linked to above. But after owning the truck for 3 months now and almost daily driving it, I've gotten quite used to it. I wear size 13 shoes FWIW.

 

And a little off-topic now... this truck is so damn comfortable, I could drive it all day long. I used to get cramps in my leg and the right side of my buttocks driving my 2016 Tacoma to and from my mountain cabin (3 hours). I did it this past weekend in my TrailBoss and it was just so easy. Plus the power!!! That crappy Ford Exploder that squatted in the passing lane on I40 doing 65 MPH didn't stand a chance when I got on the gas to aggressively pass him on the right (while giving him the stinkeye).

Posted

It surprises me that I'm not the only one! For me I find so often when I go from the throttle to the brake my foot hits the side of the brake pedal, either the offset is too great or they are too close together. I've never had this problem in any other car I've owned.

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 7/18/2019 at 9:16 AM, amxguy1970 said:

That has nothing to do with the adjustable pedals they removed. The pedals move forward and back, not closer or further apart. 

 

The reason they probably got rid of the feature is barely anyone actually used it or knew about it. Most would set it once (like myself) and never touch it again because the seat would do pretty much the same thing. I would rather the money be saved or spent somewhere else. 

 

Tyler

Actually, a lot of people do use the adjustable pedals. For various reasons... small people (men and women), pregnant women, large people.. the list goes on. It’s a safety feature that should be standard. Do you realize how many people shred their knees and worse, their chests in accidents because  they have to sit too close to the steering wheel and dash? I am glad you apparently don’t have this problem....

  • 4 months later...
Posted

I agree. I have been an avid fan of GM and owned my 05 1/2 ton Silverado for 15 years. Just decided to "upgrade" to a 2021 3/4 ton GMC. I am bringing my truck in tomorrow to have them look at the pedal position. I am average height 5 - 9 with size 10 foot. I am very uncomfortable with the difference in pedal distance between the brake and the gas. Extremely uncomfortable in traffic as I have to physically move my entire foot to reposition on the brake from the gas pedal. I thought it was only the 3/4 ton but now sounds like the same problem with the 1/2 ton. I'm hoping they can do something. Otherwise I might need to look to the competition for a truck that is actually comfortable to drive. Too bad because I loved my old truck. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,202 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...