Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I use to offer FREE Red Line oil in this context to Harley riders. Let me do a three hole fill on you TC88 and if you can't FEEL the difference by the end of the block I'll eat the cost and refill for free with anything you like. I NEVER had a guy come back and ask for anything else. Of course if he liked it, he paid me. I like getting paid. I did have one fella so hung up on his Mobil 1 he refused to even try it. 
 
That's how impressed I was with it first time I used it. I was even more impressed when I noted how much lower my oil temperatures were. I've never used any oil that gives a lower bulk oil temperature in an air cooled motor than Red Line and yes I've put AMSOIL to the test in that regard. It came in second of a dozen or so oils I tired. 

Initially in the early 90s if memory serves there weren’t synthetic oils out there. Anyway in my pulling trucks one tons pulling heavy. There was a noticeable drop in temperature and an uptick in fuel mileage. The same temperature wise in our clearing equipment. I noticed my brother selling Redline now along with Amsoil. This is more of a convenience for consumers. It’s definitely not an high profit maker.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Posted
About the easiest way to explain it is here.  [emoji4]


Yeah, I won’t hold my breath on if and when I’m randomly going to receive anything other than a bent sticker ha!


Sent from Above
Posted (edited)

Ok, AMSoil is good.  So is Royal Purple.  But GM's own Dexos-rated oil and Shell Rotella Gas Truck motor oil are just as good or better for 99% of the people out there, they are cheaper, and the Shell oil is readily available at WalMart nationwide; so you don't have to pay dealer or parts store prices.  

 

If you're not entering pulling contests or races, it is more important for Joe/Jill Public to change their oil at the OLM-indicated intervals (or sooner!) with a quality oil and filter than it is to spend 10,000 hours studying oil videos on YouTube.  After all, even mediocre engine oil is manufactured with better quality control than GM's AFM lifters.  

Edited by MaverickZ71
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, MaverickZ71 said:

Ok, AMSoil is good.  So is Royal Purple.  But GM's own Dexos-rated oil and Shell Rotella Gas Truck motor oil are just as good or better for 99% of the people out there, they are cheaper, and the Shell oil is readily available at WalMart nationwide; so you don't have to pay dealer or parts store prices.  

 

If you're not entering pulling contests or races, it is more important for Joe/Jill Public to change their oil at the OLM-indicated intervals (or sooner!) with a quality oil and filter than it is to spend 10,000 hours studying oil videos on YouTube.  After all, even mediocre engine oil is manufactured with better quality control than GM's AFM lifters.  

Pardon my presumptuousness but I'm going to rewrite a sentence: 

 

But GM's own Dexos-rated oil and Shell Rotella Gas Truck motor oil are "GOOD ENOUGH" for 99% of the people out there,...….

 

I'm sure that is what you actually meant and you're correct in THAT statement. There is no version of reality wherein a Group III oil will out perform a PAO/Ester blend when pushed to the extreme. But as you note, Joe and Jill Public don't fit that specific context. That said I will offer this. I drive allot and in doing so I observe others. 1500 Owners pulling insane (RV) loads in 4th gear at 70 mph in mid summer. That sir is a pulling contest that will not fit the context of "Good Enough" unless you are into 500 mile OCI's. 

 

I know, I know it sounds ticky-tac but others of lesser experience than yourself might take that statement as written as gospel even though I know you know better. :thumbs: I broke a nail typing that! :crackup:

Posted
2 hours ago, TXGREEK said:

 


Yeah, I won’t hold my breath on if and when I’m randomly going to receive anything other than a bent sticker ha!


Sent from Above

 

Well, not so much as waiting for them to include a hat but with the extra points you build up you can add a hat to the order and use those points to pay for the hat.  :)

 

I've had customers have as much as $35 in points that they used towards their orders.  

Posted
16 hours ago, CamGTP said:

 

 

Also if that stuff is the best ever, why doesn't Nascar or top fuel drag cars run it?

 

 

I'll be just fine running Mobil 1

This guy said it's pretty good stuff.

Kevin_harvick_blue.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I was listening to WBBM radio (Chicago) the other day after a Cubs game. They've been the team station forever. They are talking about the pitching title for this year and mention of course John Lester. 

 

His rant starts John is third from the bottom of the list. OUCH!!

 

Then he says there are only 30 pitchers eligible for the title. Okay so he's 27 on a list of 30. Lots of MLB pitchers, right. 

 

He explains that to be on this list you have to have pitched 180 full innings as a STARTER. Well that cuts out most pitchers right there. 

 

He proceeds to say that if you move the filter to 120 innings the list doubles. Alright so now Mr. Lester has moved from near dead last to a bit above mid pack. 

 

Including pitching stats from all MLB pitchers Lester is in the top 5%!

 

This is how you market your product. You move the filters to paint the best result to suit your narrative.

 

Take away the filters (hype) and Lester is a pretty darn good pitcher based on what it should be based on. Reality.

 

These ASTM, SAE and ILSAC PERFORANCE tests are filters. They don't paint a realistic picture of anything but a particular narrative. Cherry pick your opponents and I'm a pretty good boxer even at 65. Sign that guy in the wheel chair for my next fight. :) Include onlyh those who are inferior in your testing adn you look like sunshine on a cloudy day. 

 

What I'm interested in IS Chemistry. Physics. Atoms, molecules, things that can not lie and don't have agendas. No filters. ASTM physical property test interest me. Apples to apples like viscosity test at various temperatures. Lubricity would be good if they would publish it. you get the idea.  

 

You can't learn anything from the results of a rigged game. Forget the hype. What does the chemistry say? Says the food chain is still in tact. 

 

POA/Ester BLENDS 

Group III 'Marketing Synthetic"

Group II "Marketing Synthetic"

Group II

Group I

  • Like 1
Posted
I was listening to WBBM radio (Chicago) the other day after a Cubs game. They've been the team station forever. They are talking about the pitching title for this year and mention of course John Lester. 
 
His rant starts John is third from the bottom of the list. OUCH!!
 
Then he says there are only 30 pitchers eligible for the title. Okay so he's 27 on a list of 30. Lots of MLB pitchers, right. 
 
He explains that to be on this list you have to have pitched 180 full innings as a STARTER. Well that cuts out most pitchers right there. 
 
He proceeds to say that if you move the filter to 120 innings the list doubles. Alright so now Mr. Lester has moved from near dead last to a bit above mid pack. 
 
Including pitching stats from all MLB pitchers Lester is in the top 5%!
 

This is how you market your product. You move the filters to paint the best result to suit your narrative.

 
Take away the filters (hype) and Lester is a pretty darn good pitcher based on what it should be based on. Reality.
 
These ASTM, SAE and ILSAC PERFORANCE tests are filters. They don't paint a realistic picture of anything but a particular narrative. Cherry pick your opponents and I'm a pretty good boxer even at 65. Sign that guy in the wheel chair for my next fight. [emoji4] Include onlyh those who are inferior in your testing adn you look like sunshine on a cloudy day. 
 
What I'm interested in IS Chemistry. Physics. Atoms, molecules, things that can not lie and don't have agendas. No filters. ASTM physical property test interest me. Apples to apples like viscosity test at various temperatures. Lubricity would be good if they would publish it. you get the idea.  
 
You can't learn anything from the results of a rigged game. Forget the hype. What does the chemistry say? Says the food chain is still in tact. 

 

POA/Ester BLENDS 

Group III 'Marketing Synthetic"

Group II "Marketing Synthetic"

Group II

Group I


Ah, two up the top are from Houston. Not because it’s my team. Oh I forgot this is about oil.[emoji2960]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 hours ago, CamGTP said:

Also if that stuff is the best ever, why doesn't Nascar or top fuel drag cars run it?

Red Line is in many TF cars. Rails and Floppers. Shock Proof Heavy keeps the diff in one piece. 70W Nitro in the crankcases. 

Many Prostock cars and bikes use Red Line 0W or 5W straight weight racing oils.

NASCAR you bet. 

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, dieselfan1 said:

I'll be just fine running Mobil 1

This guy said it's pretty good stuff.

Kevin_harvick_blue.jpg

He goes where ever the money takes him....

Posted
15 minutes ago, elcamino said:

He goes where ever the money takes him....

That's a given.

  • Like 1
Posted
That's a given.


Funny how that works, anyone can be bought for their adds with the right amount of money, from automotive manufacturers to celebrities


Sent from Above
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, dieselfan1 said:

I'll be just fine running Mobil 1

This guy said it's pretty good stuff.

Kevin_harvick_blue.jpg

That's funny.  Last year's NASCAR Cup Champion drove a yellow car that said PENNZOIL all over it.  Guess that means Pennzoil is the best, if you believe all that marketing hype crap.  Which I don't.  In my old age, I go by the product, not by the pusher.  

Edited by MaverickZ71
  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, MaverickZ71 said:

That's funny.  Last year's NASCAR Cup Champion drove a yellow car that said PENNZOIL all over it.  Guess that means Pennzoil is the best, if you believe all that marketing hype crap.  Which I don't.  In my old age, I go by the product, not by the pusher.  

Actually I don't buy into the marketing hype. Harvick is just another schmuck to me.

I've used Mobil 1 since Harvick was in first grade.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • In the 6.6 gas thread, I added information in my fluid change thread about these gauges and temperatures. With very limited data, it so far looks like ~30 degrees difference between front and rear.
    • I know; crap pictures.   Anyway, as a finale of sorts to this thread, I had replaced both differential covers and since they had the capability of adding temperature probes, I did that. These are MaxTow analog/digital gauges with stepper motors. They'll flutter around like crazy for a moment and start at a nominal 100 degrees Fahrenheit.   I drove a 30-mile loop to the grocery store, averaging 70 MPH (as much as 80 to see if there was a quick spike in temperature. The air temperature is 102 (ambient ?). but the first pic is 7 miles into the trip. The second is getting back into the truck after leaving the store; differential temperatures dropped about three to four degrees in 15 minutes. The third pic in on the road to my house, about a mile away.   In that run, I saw a high of 150F on the rear differential, and 121F on the front. I'm sure a longer drive or towing will see higher than that, and when that happens, I can update the observations. 
    • You don't want to become predictable now, do you? 😏
    • Fully warm, coolant temp >194, closed loop.   Run time can be anywhere from just reached operating temperature to having driven 30+ miles.   The O2 chart (which is a feature I just discovered after reading) for the bad idle seems to be "most" of the time. For the little time I've been watching it (scanning and driving! watchout!) I can't seem to isolate any cause or condition yet.   It definitely idles rougher sometimes than others and so far what I've seen is the rougher idles are always rich. But not enough to set a CEL.   In other news I replaced the starter solenoid. Everything on this truck is such a PITA. Starter "snout" is mangled up with the torque converter inspection cover which is tangled up with hard cooling lines and the driveshaft. But I got 'er done without too much swearing...I just go into everything now knowing it's going to be a frustrating mess.   The starter solenoid replacement kicks off the next round of work: AC, injector rebuild, cat, exhaust. I'm just going to do it all. But first:   I don't know what my fuel pressures are. I can't definitively say the issue is the injector without first verifying fuel pressures and any leakdown. I "rented" a test kit ($199.99 at O'Really's ...intentional misspelling). They don't "rent" tools anymore, they charge you for the tool and then you return it when you're done. No joke. It is listed as a rental on the receipt but the guy told me there's no difference between renting and buying  now, you just return it when you're done and they refund the credit card. Mmmkay, whatever.   I will rule out fuel pressure issues (too much), and any leaking (that's how I'll know the problem is inside the intake). I think someone said the return line could be plugged or not flowing and that could cause high fuel pressure (and too much fuel being pushed through injectors). I'll cross that bridge if I get high readings.   As of now I'm ready to tear off the intake cover, extract the injector, and have it sent off to be rebuilt just so I can rule that out.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...