Jump to content

Blackout Project started today


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, bass mechanic said:

yes i have a 60" by 60" roll of tail light tinted vinyl, the really dark stuff. its like a clear bra product. ill be doing the upper and lower grill with that along with the running boards. i am a fan of "black chrome" and ideally the light smoke overlaid on chrome makes it look pretty sweet, but unless you could cover the entire grille that way i don't know how it would look. so i am going to try the dark stuff (the roll was only $36.00 from amazon) so ill see how black it looks on the grille, and it should resist abrasion better than the vinyl wrap. i think the rubber treads on the running boards will pop off to make the install cleaner, ill have to see otherwise i think i can trim around them.

also have some light smoke ill do the side markers in as well as an outline of the headlights. basically the sides and the C shaped running lights leaving the headlights clear.

probably do the tails in light smoke as well.

ill be getting the Banks Exhaust in black.

the wheels are going to be 22x10 wrapped in Nitto terra grappler G2 exact same height as stock the tire size will be 285/55/22 E rated 10 ply tires.

so basically about 2 inches wider than stock, i am still searching for the right wheel, i want to be positive offset, about 5 inches backspacing or more to keep them tucked under the truck.

should look pretty sick.

having a hard time deciding between these wheels

 

XD829-Black-1.jpg

71RGZdj3VML._SX466_.jpg

REBEL-8LUG-20x10-ET-18-MATTE-ANTHRACITE-W-BLK-RING-A1_1000_2862.png

Did you decide on which rim? I really like the bottom one..... until I go lookup the price ?

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
5 minutes ago, NoMoreMoney said:

Did you decide on which rim? I really like the bottom one..... until I go lookup the price ?

the problem is that rim doesn't show any specs offset, back spacing or sizes

no prices either.

if you saw one with anything probably was last years model

Posted
5 minutes ago, bass mechanic said:

the problem is that rim doesn't show any specs offset, back spacing or sizes

no prices either.

if you saw one with anything probably was last years model

Ah, ok. I was just looking (discount tire) to see what’s available. I really like the bottom one. I will stick with the factory tire size though. I sure don’t want to do anything that makes the truck any taller (I only have 1” of space between the truck roof and the garage door frame).

Posted
5 minutes ago, NoMoreMoney said:

Ah, ok. I was just looking (discount tire) to see what’s available. I really like the bottom one. I will stick with the factory tire size though. I sure don’t want to do anything that makes the truck any taller (I only have 1” of space between the truck roof and the garage door frame).

truck with these wheels and tires will be exactly the same ride height, when you go up in wheel size you down down in aspect ratio, less tire, and more wheel same tire diameter, same height.

Posted
7 minutes ago, bass mechanic said:

truck with these wheels and tires will be exactly the same ride height, when you go up in wheel size you down down in aspect ratio, less tire, and more wheel same tire diameter, same height.

Ahhh, good to know. When I start looking into changing tire sizes, I go to my father-in-law (retired Firestone Mechanic/store manager). It makes perfect sense though. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I've also been looking into rims... I pick my Denali 2500 up Monday. Been looking at either 22's or 24 x 10's. Might just level it out. Not sure on that yet. Went with the maroon color. Definitely gonna color match the fender flares, and the chrome piece in the front below the grille.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I also have a set of all black steps from my AT4. Had them on for a couple weeks until I switched them out. Just sitting in the garage, PM me if interested... Phoenix area

20190926_181249.jpg

Posted
On 11/10/2019 at 6:07 PM, bass mechanic said:

the problem is that rim doesn't show any specs offset, back spacing or sizes

no prices either.

if you saw one with anything probably was last years model

This is from fuels website.  They show all available options. This is for the 8 lug. 

7C351D5C-D3EB-4A6F-A24F-EA8124CD565A.png

Posted
5 hours ago, James89436 said:

This is from fuels website.  They show all available options. This is for the 8 lug. 

7C351D5C-D3EB-4A6F-A24F-EA8124CD565A.png

Yep no 22” option and all their backspacing is 4.75” I need to be 5-5.5 to even get close to the factory fitment  

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 11/10/2019 at 7:05 PM, NoMoreMoney said:

Did you decide on which rim? I really like the bottom one..... until I go lookup the price ?

so it turns out FUEL will be making the bottom wheel in a 22x10x+13 offset they aren't available yet for a couple more months. but a 10" wide wheel with +13 has a 6.09 backspace! the factory wheel is 6.3" so this is great news!

this means the aftermarket wheel will tuck under the truck with just 1/4 inch to spare from factory. i believe the 22" wheel will place the sidewall 1" higher from the only obstruction i see which is the upper ball joint.

at present the ball joint sits about 1" or so higher then the factory rim edge, meaning where the factory tire bulges out theres still about 3/4" before it would rub the tire. the new wheels will move the bulge of the sidewall above this location so i don't see anything that might rub on the inside.

this means the outer sidewall of the tire will be about 1.75 inches farther poke out that factory. with the tire size i picked i believe the truck will not need any modification to clear these tires.

unfortunately have to wait for them to become available before i can try it.

Posted

I have those Fuel wheels on order in a 22x10 but the -18 version, I like the wider stance look. Should be just a tad wider than fenders which is what I like, nothing crazy.

If they do end up making a +13 in that size I could see it being a good option for those who want the stock fitment. It’s always nice when we have options as typically with many 20’s and 22’s you get one offset option for a specific wheel width for your bolt pattern.

Posted
1 minute ago, FirstAscent said:

I have those Fuel wheels on order in a 22x10 but the -18 version, I like the wider stance look. Should be just a tad wider than fenders which is what I like, nothing crazy.

If they do end up making a +13 in that size I could see it being a good option for those who want the stock fitment. It’s always nice when we have options as typically with many 20’s and 22’s you get one offset option for a specific wheel width for your bolt pattern.

those should be about an inch more stick out than the +18 and pretty sure they will rub without a lift or modification. let us know how they fit and post plenty of pics!

Posted

Just my opinion could have bought a black work truck, you would have the same look for a lot less money. 

Posted
Just my opinion could have bought a black work truck, you would have the same look for a lot less money. 

Money was no object for me, I wanted all the bells and whistles and this is not my daily just for pulling the camper+boat and snow weather duty. I wanted he fancy truck so when we go on trips and vacation we can ride in style with the tow vehicle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 minutes ago, bass mechanic said:


Money was no object for me, I wanted all the bells and whistles and this is not my daily just for pulling the camper+boat and snow weather duty. I wanted he fancy truck so when we go on trips and vacation we can ride in style with the tow vehicle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ill  agree with that ,nothing like riding in style on a long trip towing your toys. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...