Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Puttnutt24 said:

Thanks Nick,

That being said, wouldn't any CAI require the same?

You would think. GM has locked these new trucks down tight and other CAI companies can’t tune for their intake. To me, if that’s the case then I don’t see much of a difference from stock. That is the reason I went with GM. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Black02Silverado said:

You would think. GM has locked these new trucks down tight and other CAI companies can’t tune for their intake. To me, if that’s the case then I don’t see much of a difference from stock. That is the reason I went with GM. 

Thanks again Nick,

Now the million dollar question, do you think we're going to be able to tune these trucks any time soon?

I've tuned my last three trucks and the difference was night and day..

Hey Blackbear Performance, are you hearing this? lol

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Puttnutt24 said:

Thanks again Nick,

Now the million dollar question, do you think we're going to be able to tune these trucks any time soon?

I've tuned my last three trucks and the difference was night and day..

Hey Blackbear Performance, are you hearing this? lol

HP Tuners can tune them now. But it is expensive. Not sure if it will be available from others anytime soon. 

Posted

The ECM flash that GM does when you get their CAI is - from what dealers say - just to help the computer understand there is more air flowing thru the MAF, and to read it back to the truck more accurately for filter replacement or any other MAF error. 
 

The other thing about the GM CAI is that it is legal in all 50 states for emissions. I think the Rotofab one is, too, but I’m not sure. I do know that not all of them are. 

Posted

So far the best intake from the ones ive seen, S&B , Volant, Cold Air Inductions, rotofab, k&n, GM, AFE. 
 

Out of these the S&B looks better and flows better. With good data to back it up.

Just tough to find it stock.

 

Posted
45 minutes ago, Chips said:

So far the best intake from the ones ive seen, S&B , Volant, Cold Air Inductions, rotofab, k&n, GM, AFE. 
 

Out of these the S&B looks better and flows better. With good data to back it up.

Just tough to find it stock.

 

You are correct. S&B flows better than any other CAI. They don’t claim HP numbers but they are cheaper than Rotofab and GMs intake by $150. And there build quality is very nice. This is my second one. 

Posted

No.

 

Aftermarket intake systems are designed to work with the factory calibration. If the intake diameter does not change, the MAF sensor does not need to be re-calibrated. That is why anyone can buy a kit from Airaid, AFE etc etc and just slap it on the truck. The minimal gains come from a smoother design with no baffles or resonator tubes.

Posted
11 hours ago, CamGTP said:

No.

 

Aftermarket intake systems are designed to work with the factory calibration. If the intake diameter does not change, the MAF sensor does not need to be re-calibrated. That is why anyone can buy a kit from Airaid, AFE etc etc and just slap it on the truck. The minimal gains come from a smoother design with no baffles or resonator tubes.

You are correct. That’s why S&B requires u to disconnect the battery for 2 hours. Truck relearns new intake system. I’ve had mine on for week. Put on almost 600 miles on it. Just got back from lake house driving 87 mph on the interstate and didn’t/haven’t had an issue yet. ??
I believe all the GM recalibration does is shut off the filter life. It has nothing to do with recalibrating the amount of air. 

Posted
45 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

You are correct. That’s why S&B requires u to disconnect the battery for 2 hours. Truck relearns new intake system. I’ve had mine on for week. Put on almost 600 miles on it. Just got back from lake house driving 87 mph on the interstate and didn’t/haven’t had an issue yet. ??
I believe all the GM recalibration does is shut off the filter life. It has nothing to do with recalibrating the amount of air. 

The ECM flash doesn't shut off the filter life, you are instructed to do that per the installation instructions in the DIC.  I didn't just because.  Wanted to see how fast the filter life goes down in relation to time and miles driven.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

The ECM flash doesn't shut off the filter life, you are instructed to do that per the installation instructions in the DIC.  I didn't just because.  Wanted to see how fast the filter life goes down in relation to time and miles driven.

The point is the ECM flash they do isnt a tune , it also 100% cannot change the way the maf works. The ECM “flash” is a reset . It equates to the same function unplugging the battery does, it resets the fuel trims and relearns based on conditions .
 

This is why if you are after the best intake , its best to look at design and airflow numbers . In this case the S & B is the best per the data published . The design is also the nicest but thats opinion not data.

Edited by Chips
Posted
2 hours ago, Chips said:

The point is the ECM flash they do isnt a tune , it also 100% cannot change the way the maf works. The ECM “flash” is a reset . It equates to the same function unplugging the battery does, it resets the fuel trims and relearns based on conditions .
 

This is why if you are after the best intake , its best to look at design and airflow numbers . In this case the S & B is the best per the data published . The design is also the nicest but thats opinion not data.

So if it is the same as a rest, as in just disconnecting the battery, which the instructions tell you to do, then why does GM waste their Techs time and money having you take it in to do a "flash".   GM is not in the game to spend money that is for sure.  There has to be another reason.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

So if it is the same as a rest, as in just disconnecting the battery, which the instructions tell you to do, then why does GM waste their Techs time and money having you take it in to do a "flash".   GM is not in the game to spend money that is for sure.  There has to be another reason.

Its to reset the fuel trims , Disconnecting the battery can do this too but it can take several hours to do. You need all residual power to leave the ecm.

 

and dont kid yourself its not for free the intake is priced accordingly. If the GM intake came with any kinda “tune” every single person would go this route .

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Chips said:

Its to reset the fuel trims , Disconnecting the battery can do this too but it can take several hours to do. You need all residual power to leave the ecm.

 

and dont kid yourself its not for free the intake is priced accordingly. If the GM intake came with any kinda “tune” every single person would go this route .

 

 

They would make more money keeping the price the same and then just including in the instructions to disconnect the battery for 12 hours.  Taking it in to have the ECM flashed is taking up a slot for another customer that they could be making more money on.  Looks like the GM bean counters didn't do their job on this one then.

Posted
1 hour ago, Black02Silverado said:

They would make more money keeping the price the same and then just including in the instructions to disconnect the battery for 12 hours.  Taking it in to have the ECM flashed is taking up a slot for another customer that they could be making more money on.  Looks like the GM bean counters didn't do their job on this one then.

you are right GM wouldnt do it for no reason.

 

Its possible that it also prevents the ecu from throwing a code due to the higher air flow. I guess the main thing im pointing out if you installed the intake and didnt to the ecm flash vs doing the flash , you arent going to see a hp/Torque discrepancy between the two setups.


 

 

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 1/1/2020 at 5:56 PM, Billet Bowtie said:

I felt the same way. I ended up purchasing the Volant. With the MIT and filter costing over $200 and the Rotofab at $500 the Volant seemed to be the best of both worlds at $275. I really like the look of the Rotofab but for almost twice the price and most likely about the same performance it just seems over priced for a air intake. The above picture of the Volant is accurate. The top of the airbox is a couple of inches higher so the higher volume cone filter can fit. Here is a picture of mine installed. 

20200101_161258.jpg

Have you realized an increase in mpg, especially at highway speeds? Did you need to get a tuner adjustment or did the system adjust automatically? Thank you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,980
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Fishboat
    Newest Member
    Fishboat
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 521 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...