Jump to content

Speed Limited ???????


Phil Mac

Recommended Posts

Posted

Quick question. I have a 2017 Sierra w a 6.2L . Opened it up on a open roadway and hit approximately 100MPH when it wouldn't pull anymore. Is it possible it has a speed limiter on it ????

Thanks in advance.

 

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
Quick question. I have a 2017 Sierra w a 6.2L . Opened it up on a open roadway and hit approximately 100MPH when it wouldn't pull anymore. Is it possible it has a speed limiter on it ????
Thanks in advance.
 
I've heard they were. Never had mine past 90.

Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk

Posted

It's not that's possible, it's that it's a 100% fact that it's speed limited.

 

95% of the limiters are 98mph, so once you bumped over that it stops you.

 

This is for several reasons. One being that the factory tires have speed ratings and most aren't that much over 100mph and the other one is that the factory driveshaft is not rated above 100mph. They are tons on threads and some cool youtube video's of stock driveshafts exploding on the dyno or the street.

 

When they grenade the results aren't pretty, broken transmission housings, dented bed floors and damaged fuel tanks.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Booger T said:

Why the need to go over 100 mph is beyond me.

The T1s will do over 100, they're limited to 113 MPH I believe. Sounds like it's time to trade up OP. :driving:

Posted

If one wants to go over 100 mph I guess that is their prerogative. I personally out grew that desire years ago and think that it is for the most part stupid unless it is on an approved course with the appropriate safety measures in place.

Posted
1 hour ago, jlong1984 said:

The T1s will do over 100, they're limited to 113 MPH I believe. Sounds like it's time to trade up OP. :driving:

Some will. It depends on the vehicle package and tires installed. Many are still limited to 98mph.

Posted

I've heard it depends on the speed rating of the tires that came from the factory, and it also has to do with if it is a 4x4 or not.  there have been reports of 140ish MPH Top speed with the limiter removed by a programmer on the half tons.  Then you need more HP to overcome the aerodynamic brick you are driving, and also hope that the transmission, drive shaft, and axles don't blow up because they were not engineered to go that fast. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Phil Mac said:

Quick question. I have a 2017 Sierra w a 6.2L . Opened it up on a open roadway and hit approximately 100MPH when it wouldn't pull anymore. Is it possible it has a speed limiter on it ????

Thanks in advance.

 

My 2014 5.3L was limited to 98.  My 2018 5.3L has a limit beyond what I have been comfortable pushing the truck to so far.

Posted
13 hours ago, jlong1984 said:

The T1s will do over 100, they're limited to 113 MPH I believe. Sounds like it's time to trade up OP. :driving:

yeah, trade up to a Downgrade, lol

Posted

I’m definitely not one for unsafe high speed driving. I’ve been out west we’re the limits are high. I remember being on back roads in the pine barrens in NJ. My father driving 1970 CST 400 small block P/U on miles of deserted open road, with the speedometer coming back around to zero. Him saying keep an eye out for deer. With a big old smile on his face, that didn’t come often. Risky you bet. I don’t want big brother telling me you can’t, I want the choice. The stretch of road is just as barren. I can imagine my fathers response if his new 6.2 10 speed truck shut down at 99 MPH.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

The way the vehicle is equipped varies and so does the speed limiter.  2019 Silverado crew cab short bed 5.3L 8speed with 17 inch wheels limited to 98MPH.  2017 Silverado WT 4x4 crew cab, 17 inch wheels 5.3L 6speed did 106MPH.

 

2020 K2XX police package Tahoe has no electronic limiter and with 5.3L/6speed/3.08 (2WD version) does 139 and if I remember correctly, acheives this speed at the top of 4th gear.  I doubt a half ton truck would be able to acheive faster than that unless is was a 6.2L.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 362 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...