Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

X2   curious as well.  I've been searching all over the internet and could not find anything.  My truck has a TPW of 4/20.   I'm 5 weeks after you.  Probably looking at June now. 

 

Posted

Mine is TPW 4/20 and last I’ve heard GM is not announcing a restart date any time soon. Ford and Ram are restarting limited production next week I believe. 

Posted

Ford and GM are still on indefinite close status and FCA said May 4.  I don't see any plants opening before first week of May in Michigan.

 

#iworkforGM 

Posted (edited)

I also have a tpw 4/20  im getting another truck heading towards my dealer now missing some stuff but id rather have the truck then the stuff at this point

 

with gm building vents for govt to be completed by august  I would assume they will not open much till then

 

Edited by mkeddie
Posted

Published date: 06 April 2020

 

GM said it continues to evaluate restarting its facilities when it is safe to do so.

 

Posted

Michigan's stay at home order extended to April 30.  Best case opening will be around May 4.  It takes an day or two to get body and paint shop running after cold shutdown.

 

#iworkforGM 

Posted

Was at dealership yesterday and talked with general manager.  He said they were on call earlier this week with GM and estimates are mid June before Flint, MI get back to manufacturing trucks.  There will also be supply channels that will have to be primed and back filled to get parts back to the factory.   In the end, he was told to not expect any new vehicles until mid/late July or possibly August if things lag in how the current  C-19 tracking goes.  Depending on features ordered and supply line challenges, it could be longer for some orders.  His thoughts were about July/August 2021 to get his dealership inventory back up to where it should be.  Tough Times!!!!!!

Posted

I found this forum looking for information so I joined! I also was TPW 3/16 so I feel your pain. I got a VIN on 3/20 from the GM chat, but now they say I am in 3400 with no VIN. No real idea if it got built or not, and no new information since then. I guess we will all sit, wait, and hope all this stuff gets under control so we can get back to working. 

 

 

Posted (edited)

had to cave.... went to the lot today, canceling the order.

 

Edited by eagle4495
Posted
On 4/15/2020 at 10:42 PM, eagle4495 said:

had to cave.... went to the lot today, canceling the order.

 

Did you ask the dealership if they would offer any kind of deal with using a truck in the meantime if you need a truck? I can’t go fishing without a truck to pull it. My build week was 03/23 so I’m just thinking positive as of now. Hopefully Flint starts in May.

Posted

But by then they will likely be 2021 models and no more 2020 models.  Existing orders would be cancelled.  Just a hunch

Posted

I wouldnt think they would cancel already tpw builds they may turn into 21s but to just remove them I don't think so

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using Tapatalk

Posted
7 hours ago, Toops said:

Did you ask the dealership if they would offer any kind of deal with using a truck in the meantime if you need a truck? I can’t go fishing without a truck to pull it. My build week was 03/23 so I’m just thinking positive as of now. Hopefully Flint starts in May.

My original build was 4/20 like I said. The dealership and GM customer service said if GM reopens in May then I will be slotted for mid/late July (I don’t remember the date). 
They actually started to back out of my trade deal, then they shut down so I could not buy through them or change my order. 
I went to another dealership who offered me a great deal on a Sierra instead of my Silverado and let me drive my truck as a free no fault rental until they finished adding some options to the Sierra. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,096 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...