Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

Which make? 

2013 Odyssey EX-L. I guess that gen of Odysseys have known issues with suspension components. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, econometrics said:

2013 Odyssey EX-L. I guess that gen of Odysseys have known issues with suspension components. 

Yeah, I heard those Odysseys had some issues. Surprising for Honda. 

Posted

My biggest complaint about my 2019 when I got it was that the back end felt "light." I live in a rural area and drive probably 35% gravel roads. My 2017 I could run 60mph down a rough gravel road if I wanted to and it would stay straight. My 2019 was scary on gravel at first and I would notice it even on bumps on the highway. I have since leveled my truck and put airbags on the back axle and it seems better than it used to be, but I may have gotten used to it to in the 12k miles I have put on it. GM must not have tested off the highway much with these trucks. 

Posted

Where are you guys getting Bilsteins for the rear?    I can’t find em anywhere.   I desperately want shocks for the rear.  2019 Silverado

Posted
7 hours ago, CatRacer213 said:

My biggest complaint about my 2019 when I got it was that the back end felt "light." I live in a rural area and drive probably 35% gravel roads. My 2017 I could run 60mph down a rough gravel road if I wanted to and it would stay straight. My 2019 was scary on gravel at first and I would notice it even on bumps on the highway. I have since leveled my truck and put airbags on the back axle and it seems better than it used to be, but I may have gotten used to it to in the 12k miles I have put on it. GM must not have tested off the highway much with these trucks. 

My 2020 rides just like that paved roads.  I can get the rear to step out on just regular roads. Hell it will do it on a Interstate.  I haven't taken it down the washboard dirt road yet.  Already know the outcome. 

Posted (edited)

I was probably the first one to report it.. RST wasn't that common when I first got it.. and got picked on left and right from GM fanboys.
 

I was so pissed over it. Fortunately, other RST Z71 and Elevation X31 owners are reporting the same thing. I was shocked it could actually keep sliding sideways with the wild shuddering and I had to slam my brakes.

Bilsteins 5100s are the way to go. The front end stays planted to the road but the back end was a completely different story. The F-150 I had before that would have all four tires bobbing up and down, but at least all four were the same so it never fishtailed.

The comments from those who couldn't dish it are why I have over 20 members here blocked.

Edited by Wiggums
Posted

The only thing that helped the ride and control in such situations was adding a Hellwig Big Wig anti-sway bar at the rear axle. No change in ride with a heavy load in the bed but when the bed was empty there was a lot of wheel hop before adding the Big Wig.

 

If shocks were the problem it would be evident with irregular tire wear. If you have a bad shock it should be evident if you bounce on the corners of the truck and compare the results. I have had GM and Mercedes shocks fail after as few as 20,000 miles.

Posted (edited)
On 7/17/2020 at 7:30 PM, ohskigod said:

Where are you guys getting Bilsteins for the rear?    I can’t find em anywhere.   I desperately want shocks for the rear.  2019 Silverado

i believe the 2018 rears are same and fit new model.....its the fronts that are different

Edited by Dunn
Posted
On 7/10/2020 at 11:33 AM, tonto340 said:

I just put Bilstein 5100s on the rear of mine today. I haven't driven it yet.

There is now a 5100 for the front but no one has it yet. Part # for the front will be Part Number: 24-293297. The rear is Part Number: 24-293471.

Did you drive it yet? Was there an actual difference or do you believe that it is more in your mind?

Posted

BlancoSilverado: I think my truck rides a little better with the Bilsteins. The 5100s react faster which keeps the tires in contact with the road surface, i.e., less bounce.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/18/2020 at 6:29 PM, Wintersun said:

The only thing that helped the ride and control in such situations was adding a Hellwig Big Wig anti-sway bar at the rear axle. No change in ride with a heavy load in the bed but when the bed was empty there was a lot of wheel hop before adding the Big Wig.

 

If shocks were the problem it would be evident with irregular tire wear. If you have a bad shock it should be evident if you bounce on the corners of the truck and compare the results. I have had GM and Mercedes shocks fail after as few as 20,000 miles.

Did you install the sway bar yourself? Seems pretty straightforward from the instructions on their website... 

Posted (edited)

2019 Sierra Elevation 4x4.

Have a levelling kit and LT275/65R20 BF Goodrich KO2 tires set at 42 PSI.

My truck also has the Max Trailering/NHT option with stock shocks.

I definitely get a lot of bounce or “bunny hoping when going over bumps like the back end bounces sideways.

My last truck 07 Silverado Z71 didn’t do this.

I find it annoying for sure at times and my wife really notices it while in the truck.

 

We did a camping trip a pulled our 24’ trailer and it towed beautifully.  No bouncing once loaded but when driving the truck down a dirt road without the trailer there was quite a bit of bouncing around!

I guess having high payload and towing capacity comes at a cost!

Edited by madconcept
Posted

they dont spend alot of money or time on stock suspension....its one of many parts that have to meet a pricepoint and still work.....so any reputuable shock should be better than OEM....

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I added a double leaf set of Supersprings to my truck and so the wheel hop was quite noticeable when hitting a pothole or rut or expansion joint on an overpass. What fixed the problem was adding a Hellwig Big Wig rear anti sway bar to the rear axle. Anti sway bars will cause a road shock at one wheel to be transmitted to the opposite wheel which is usually viewed as a negative aspect of their use but on a truck it means that a good portion of the shock from the wheel hitting the pothole is shared by the opposite wheel.

 

I added the Big Wig in an effort to reduce roll with a 3700 lb camper in the bed and for this it made no improvement. Later when I had the camper off the truck and the bed more or less empty other than the weight of a fiberglass cap I soon noticed the improved ride. Not cheap at $450 but it took only an hour of my time to attach it and did so with the truck's wheels on the ground. I now consider a rear anti-sway bar as a must have on my pickups.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...