Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

But no 6.2L, no G80 in the rear, not even a solid axle. This is supposed to be the off road version???

 

Chevy got so close for me and then there are these two glaring issues. 

Posted (edited)

I hear you on the 6.2. 

 

That said, the independent rear suspension is why the G80 isn't there and instead the RPO code G86 mechanical limited slip is (standard on all trims too).  There is an eLSD on the GMCs which those are pretty sweet tech pulled from the Camaro/Corvette.  I think I'd rather take either limited slip over the G80 anyway.  LSD won't spontaneously explode.        

 

The switch from SRA to IRS was well known for a few years too so no surprises there.  Better ride, they lowered the load floor 5 inches, better 3rd row configuration, flat load floor, etc.   

Edited by newdude
  • Like 3
Posted
On 8/18/2020 at 5:08 PM, newdude said:

I hear you on the 6.2. 

 

That said, the independent rear suspension is why the G80 isn't there and instead the RPO code G86 mechanical limited slip is (standard on all trims too).  There is an eLSD on the GMCs which those are pretty sweet tech pulled from the Camaro/Corvette.  I think I'd rather take either limited slip over the G80 anyway.  LSD won't spontaneously explode.        

 

The switch from SRA to IRS was well known for a few years too so no surprises there.  Better ride, they lowered the load floor 5 inches, better 3rd row configuration, flat load floor, etc.   

I’m unfamiliar with this eLSD...is it similar to Toyota’s A-TRAC system?

 

While the cargo area may be 5” taller, I have a flat load floor in my 2012. I do have to take the 3rd row out, though.

Posted
I hear you on the 6.2. 
 
That said, the independent rear suspension is why the G80 isn't there and instead the RPO code G86 mechanical limited slip is (standard on all trims too).  There is an eLSD on the GMCs which those are pretty sweet tech pulled from the Camaro/Corvette.  I think I'd rather take either limited slip over the G80 anyway.  LSD won't spontaneously explode.        
 
The switch from SRA to IRS was well known for a few years too so no surprises there.  Better ride, they lowered the load floor 5 inches, better 3rd row configuration, flat load floor, etc.   
I read that about the lsd on all models but i am curious as to why TFL couldnt get their z71 tahoe to get both rear wheels to spin. It was kind of pathetic how the tahoe couldnt get traction on a simple obstacle.

Do we know if the Chevy's will get the Elsd? Its part of a 9k.option package for the at4 which sucks.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
I’m unfamiliar with this eLSD...is it similar to Toyota’s A-TRAC system?
 
While the cargo area may be 5” taller, I have a flat load floor in my 2012. I do have to take the 3rd row out, though.


Works great in my Camaro. They even have a track program you can pay to have added. Haven’t gone that far with mine


Ryan B.
Posted
9 hours ago, Chebby said:

I’m unfamiliar with this eLSD...is it similar to Toyota’s A-TRAC system?

 

While the cargo area may be 5” taller, I have a flat load floor in my 2012. I do have to take the 3rd row out, though.

 

Should be similar to the Camaro and Corvette one, but not sure on how adjustable it is.  

 

 

Posted

The limited slip rear end on the new Z71 Tahoe does not look very impressive... (if the link doesn't work, play it at 6:35)

 

 

I mean... ugh. That's not a very crazy obstacle they're trying to clear there. ??‍♂️ 

 

Posted
The limited slip rear end on the new Z71 Tahoe does not look very impressive... (if the link doesn't work, play it at 6:35)
 
 
I mean... ugh. That's not a very crazy obstacle they're trying to clear there. [emoji2359] 
 
Yup, thats the video I was talking about in my comment above. Not sure whats going on but definitely did not lock up.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Posted

GM figures that most folks that drive Suburbans don't do heavy duty off roading with them. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 8/30/2020 at 2:13 AM, Colossus said:

GM figures that most folks that drive Suburbans don't do heavy duty off roading with them. 

Yeah, that’s fine. It just makes the marketing confusing. This is supposed to be the tough off-road version. But nope. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/7/2020 at 6:36 AM, Chebby said:

Yeah, that’s fine. It just makes the marketing confusing. This is supposed to be the tough off-road version. But nope. 

I think Z71 has recently been the "slightly tougher than the non-Z71" version. They add skid plates, a different grill insert and/or bumper, some badging, and slightly stiffer shocks or something. It's not *really* going to compete offroad with things like a Jeep or a Bronco. But it's a 3-ton 18 foot long SUV. It's not a rock crawler. Even the Z71 version is basically just telling people "Look, if you go camping, this can probably go through a dirt road that's got some mud and/or holes in it, provided they're not too bad." 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Just wish they'd throw in vented seats to the Z71 trims. I have no idea why they're so stingy with those considering the price of the vehicle. 

  • Like 2
Posted

I had just seen a z71 Tahoe bombing up the highway near Toronto, not too many of these here yet and absolutely no suburbans or xl or esv yet. But with the Z71 and probably others I noticed the rear control arms down near the wheel and they were low. Even the Expedition does not hang that low. I am not sure the airbags are going to raise this but i would be concerned.

Posted
On 8/30/2020 at 3:13 AM, Colossus said:

GM figures that most folks that drive Suburbans don't do heavy duty off roading with them. 

Suburbans are too long to really do a whole lot of serious off-roading anyway

Posted

I think we can all agree it is not intended to be a serious off road vehicle but a rear locking diff, vented front seats and a 6.2 would go a long way to please a lot of people. After all it is a “Z71”. It should come with something more than a badge. I just sold my 2017 Z71 suburban and i didnt rock crawl it but it did get used in 4wd in the mountains. Worked great to road trip there and then to get to more remote places. The Z71 trim deserves better. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,063 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...