Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just kit 45k and want to do a trans fluid / filter change. I checked my dip stick and the first wipe was black. Checked it after and its light pink. Firet time I really checked it since owning at 10k miles. I have the diablo tune. I think i want to turn off torque management.. Not sure tho. Service manual only says to change it at 45k for severe use. I tow my 900lb atv once every few weeks. And I have 34" tires. Otherwise thats all.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Posted

Fluid changes are cheap insurance IMO. 

Owners manual also shows you how to check your oil. Do I need to elaborate?

  • Like 2
Posted

Did you check for any tsbs? Sounds eerily similar to the 8spds problem's until they came out with the new trans oil.  

Posted
7 hours ago, acinquegrana said:

I just kit 45k and want to do a trans fluid / filter change. I checked my dip stick and the first wipe was black. Checked it after and its light pink. Firet time I really checked it since owning at 10k miles. I have the diablo tune. I think i want to turn off torque management.. Not sure tho. Service manual only says to change it at 45k for severe use. I tow my 900lb atv once every few weeks. And I have 34" tires. Otherwise thats all.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

I would consider the larger tire to be taxing on the trans and would have the fluid filter changed.  Maybe some other guys can chime in also about whether switching the Torque management off will actually help.  In theory I would think yes but get some more opinions.

Posted

Being that these are a torque based computer, turning off torque management is not an option. The problem isn't torque mngt either because you can make the transmission do exactly what you want it to do without ever really touching it.

 

Adjusting shift points, shift time and torque converter settings are key to a good transmission tune.

Posted

Been a busy week for me. I didn't watch the video and I get on here when I can.  How often did you change out the transmission fluid?

Posted
10 hours ago, aanold said:

 

Torque converter chewed up my 6L80E.

 

https://youtu.be/pcSJN_E1KOw

 

2016 Silverado 1500 LT

Black

2.5 Level with Eibach Springs and Struts

Flowmaster 40 Series

Well, it wasn't the transmission that failed then, it was the converter!  6L80s are very reliable but were made less reliable when GM put the thermostat on them to help with emissions.  Get rid of it and change the fluid every 40K miles or less if towing a lot and they'll last a long time.  Average life in a GMT900 is about 170K miles and that is usually just the solenoids that need rebuilding which costs $100 plus fluids and you do it on your kitchen table.

  • Like 1
Posted

Mine started acting up at 45,000 miles. 

 

Did a pan drop and filter change, no help. Torque converter shudder. Sold it with 52,000 miles. Truck was babied from day one, mostly highway mileage, never towed, never hauled anything, bone stock tires and rims. Well maintained, made no difference. 

 

And I wasn't the only one that I personally knew with the same problem.

Posted

Shoulda beat on it more lol. I like watching the grandma car pull out into traffic and it's the first time they really stepped on the throttle in forever. Massive clouds of black soot come out the tailpipe because of all the carbon build up.

 

Not saying that driving it harder would have saved it but I drive all my vehicles hard and have yet to suffer any major failure because of it.

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)
On 10/15/2020 at 4:15 PM, aanold said:

I would consider the larger tire to be taxing on the trans and would have the fluid filter changed.  Maybe some other guys can chime in also about whether switching the Torque management off will actually help.  In theory I would think yes but get some more opinions.

we all know what the problem is . but no one is saying' lol  .10 cent part cost everyone $4000 i call it GM's planned obsolecence

Edited by flyingfool
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, flyingfool said:

we all know what the problem is . but no one is saying' lol  .10 cent part cost everyone $4000 i call it GM's planned obsolescence 

So agree!  Horrible way to do business. 

Posted

Since the rebuild I love the truck again but I notice that with the stock tune you can notice the torque management easing in to the next gear way too much. 
 

It reminds me of when someone rides the clutch too much to try and smooth out the operation of a standard tranny. 

Posted
1 hour ago, aanold said:

Since the rebuild I love the truck again but I notice that with the stock tune you can notice the torque management easing in to the next gear way too much. 
 

It reminds me of when someone rides the clutch too much to try and smooth out the operation of a standard tranny. 

you might need to have a tuner correct the timing tables for the engine vs TM

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,838 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...