Jump to content
Message added by Zane,

Hey everyone, we noticed this question comes up a lot, so we finally put together one master cheat sheet. It covers the exact oil capacity, filter numbers, and drain plug torques for every GM truck and SUV from 2016 through 2026. Bookmark the full guide here so you never have to guess again: https://www.gm-trucks.com/gm-engine-oil-capacity-guide/

Recommended Posts

Posted

They created the new oil spec for a reason.

 

They only use it in this motor.

They don't call for it in the 6.6L big brother.  It uses the same spec as most semi truck-sized and large offroad diesels.

They don't call for it in the 2.8L little brother either. It calls for a third type of oil.

 

The emissions stuff on the 3.0L is combined in a way we have not seen before.

I haven't seen any document that says for sure, but it would seem likely that the additives in DexosD are different from the other oils so that are compatible with the unique emissions on the 3.0L. 

 

Emissions stuff is stupid expensive to replace.

And there won't be any warranty if they determine the wrong oil spec was used.

 

 

 

 

Posted

Unfortunately one of the reasons I went back to gasoline when I purchased the Sierra. I traded in a colorado diesel, I loved the diesel but the 5w-30 dexos 2 oil was relatively expensive. I really wanted the 3.0 duramax but between several emissions related issues on my colorado (all covered) and knowing that the 3.0 was using yet a different and, for now, relatively pricier oil, I just couldn't justify all the added costs.

I know it's not necessarily what this post was about, but it's so unfortunate that the diesel emissions systems need to be so complicated, which does bring us back to the dexosD oil!

-Dave
2020 GMC Sierra Elevation Double Cab PBM

Posted

I did use the oil kit from Amazon and everything went fine.   I will say they designed the crossbars and parts underneath to make the oilchange very simple and clean.  No dripping onto your frame or anything.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

I save enough in fuel expenses vs. either v8 to pay a little extra for oil changes and still come out ahead.  

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/24/2021 at 6:38 PM, Dmax3 said:

I save enough in fuel expenses vs. either v8 to pay a little extra for oil changes and still come out ahead.  

Don't forget it holds less oil than the V8's....:thumbs:

Posted

FYI 

 

In the newest AMSOIL magazine is a 0W20 Diesel oil for Dexos D applications.

Also a 5W30 for Dexos D.

 

Every time an OEM designs a new motor someone starts the oil FUD routine.

:shakehead:

GM does not have a 3.0 only/specific exhaust catalyst.

:wtf:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

Will have to check that out. I know of a dealer not far from me. Amsoil is always good stuff. Problem is the truck sits 90% of the time with working from home! Just not putting the miles on it.

  • 8 months later...
Posted

WIX10351 didn’t work for me, felt like the thread pitch was different and I wasn’t about to chance it. Had to search for a PF66 but finally found one and it spun on correctly. Just FYI

Posted

Here is some info from GM service bullitin. 

 

Good info from GM

...
Reference Number: GCUS-9-11766

PF66 (GM #55495105) Oil Filter Shortage and Replacement Parts Effective 8/20/2021


Due to increase in demand in the past 6 months, the PF66 oil filter (GM# 55495105) is currently backordered.

In the immediate interim, GM Engineering has recommended the ACDelco UPF66R as the preferred approved filter.

While not equivalent with the OE filter, considering the potential impact on GM vehicle owner satisfaction, we are allowing the usage of the following aftermarket filters for a limited time until a solution is identified. Additional bulletins will be distributed advising of sufficient PF66 availability and ending the competitive aftermarket filter warranty. We will also continue to warranty the engines (subject to remaining warranty) that receive one of the following aftermarket filters:
 

  • Mighty – M9510
  • Valvoline – VO202
  • Parts Master – WL610351
  • Luber-finer – PH10066
  • Champ – PH10066
  • Wix – WL10351
  • NapaGold – 100351
  • PurolatorTech – TL11241
  • Purolator – L11424

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,479 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...