Jump to content

GMC Remote access, yay or nay?

ero2
 Share

Recommended Posts

econometrics Senior Enthusiast

econometrics

Posted
Posted

I cashed out some GM points from the purchase of my truck and kept the subscription for like 9 months, then went month-to-month paying $16.99 (post tax) or whatever for about 6 months. 

 

Once COVID hit, and I was working from home all the time, I canceled it. I liked the remote start functions on the truck a lot during winter and summer (cooling down the truck 10 min before getting out of the mall was really nice!). But now both my home office and new work office are within starting range of the key fob, so I never used the app. 

 

That was about all I used it for... other than locking the truck sometimes whenever I couldn't remember if I locked it or not, ha! 

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

TNTSierra
TNTSierra

When I had it for 5 years for FREE on my last 3 GMC trucks I loved it.  Then I traded my 2018 in for my high country and you only get to use the App for 30 days!!  I was p!ss$d.  I couldn’t believe

Monkey
Monkey

As someone who used to travel every week (thanks Rona) it's worth it for me as I used to start the truck when I landed so by the time I got out of the airport the truck was ready to go. Since I haven

Resqu2
Resqu2

I was shocked when they told me what had been free for years was now $15 a month, yea right. They can keep it at that price. I’d pay $5 but that’s it! 

2016 Sierra Owner Senior Enthusiast

2016 Sierra Owner

Posted
Posted

I had it and used it on my 16. It came with 5 years of service for free though. After my 1 month on the 20 expired I have actually deleted the app off my phone. I only really used it a work during the winter anyway.

 

Therickyp Enthusiast

Therickyp

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 11/11/2020 at 4:33 PM, omegafiler said:

Agreed. It's ridiculous that they only give you a 30-day trial, which is the shortest I've seen from any manufacture. Heck, I won't pay for it out of principle alone. The full connected services should be included for 3-5 years, if not longer. The safety and security plan could be useful on a long trip, but that's still too much. 

 

Sending a message to GM/OnStar aside, I think most folks will still find it overpriced unless they rely on it every day. But as usual, only you can decide if the features are "worth it."

You can get it for free for 3 months if you put your card on file when you do the welcome call. I also told them I could only pay $100 a year and they agreed to it. I remote start my truck every day. 

Edited by Therickyp
ero2 Enthusiast

ero2

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The only thing that’s kind of cool that I miss, now that it’s cancelled, is that I could lock, unlock, remote start, etc regardless of range, and I don’t have to open the garage door to hear if I held the button long enough for it to start.  So some have had luck in negotiating the pricing by calling in?

 

It’s cool for sure, just struggle with it being 15 a month.

omegafiler Senior Enthusiast

omegafiler

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, Therickyp said:

You can get it for free for 3 months if you put your card on file when you do the welcome call. I also told them I could only pay $100 a year and they agreed to it. I remote start my truck every day. 

Yeah, I saw that extra few months offer, which I didn't bother with. Although I'm curious just how little they'd accept for an extended contract. I was wondering if they'd even proactively offer something more reasonable after I let it expire. 

slj2008 Senior Enthusiast

slj2008

Posted
Posted

i used it a few times for free , then GM wanted money ?  Key Fob have no range , had better range on my 2015 . Even with NEW Battery's . GM need's to inprove the Fob Range , or lower the price on there plan ??

aseibel Senior Enthusiast

aseibel

Posted
Posted
On 11/10/2020 at 4:16 PM, ero2 said:

Is It worth the $120 a year to you?

I thought having the remote access app was a pretty cool feature. I got it free for 5 years, which expired this past June.

 

Turns out in the past 5 months, there hasn't been a single time I wish I still had it.

I'd rather pay $1 per use and probably wouldn't even cover the cost of 1 month of their new plan over a whole year.

 

If they offered something much cheaper, I'd probly buy it just for the rare chance of getting locked out or something, but, nope, sorry. Onstar is not getting any of my money.

Jason Pepin Enthusiast

Jason Pepin

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, ero2 said:

So some have had luck in negotiating the pricing by calling in?

Definitely. I called pretending not to know the standard price and when they offered it for $15 per month, I explained that it just wasn't worth that to me. I told them that $5 per month was more reasonable and I'd be wiling to pay for a full year at a discount. I got put on hold and the rep came back with an offer for $99 for a year. I said that still wasn't good enough and they countered with $90 for the year ($7.50 per month). I ended up accepting that.

omegafiler Senior Enthusiast

omegafiler

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jason Pepin said:

Definitely. I called pretending not to know the standard price and when they offered it for $15 per month, I explained that it just wasn't worth that to me. I told them that $5 per month was more reasonable and I'd be wiling to pay for a full year at a discount. I got put on hold and the rep came back with an offer for $99 for a year. I said that still wasn't good enough and they countered with $90 for the year ($7.50 per month). I ended up accepting that.

Sounds like the same thing SiruisXM have done for years. Hah. Usually for them it was the 3rd push-back before they finally got to their ~$5/mo offer. Eventually I stopped even accepting that as with music royalty fee and taxes, it wasn't worth it. Especially now that we've got Android Auto and Carplay. 

 

I'm still not really driving all that much to justify paying for the Onstar services. I'll probably just add them "as needed," such as taking a long road trip. Then just pay for a month of the top package, add in hotspot, etc. 

RWTJR Enthusiast

RWTJR

Posted
Posted

Nay, and it's all because of the price. I think the features are cool but they just don't meet the cost vs benefit for me.

 

I find the pricing scheme to be short sighted just like SiriusXM. The difference is, you can get SiriusXM to reduce the price by negotiating. Although I think Sirius would be better off and have a ton more subscribers if they just made it 5 bucks a month WITHOUT having to call and negotiate every 6 months to a year. That said, because I can/do negotiate Sirius down to $5 a month, I have it in all 3 of my vehicles (and have for years).

 

Why am I going on about Sirius in a thread about Onstar services? Because I view Onstar the same way. If the Onstar packages/features were more reasonably priced I would also have them in all 3 vehicles. However, they seem to have chosen a less volume, higher price scheme vs a high volume, lower price scheme.

 

It's not about the money per se, as it is the value. Even in the free introductory period I never used any Onstar features on any of my vehicles but if were inexpensive enough I'd buy it just for insurance and convenience. Under those circumstances Onstar would still be making some money off me while I probably still wouldn't use the services except in an emergency. Instead they choose to not get any of my money.

 

JMHO

No expertise implied or expressed

LD New Member

LD

Posted
Posted

I just declined onstar's sales pitch on my 2020, In all honesty I love the truck ( and the past truck ) both GM's. They really drop the ball on stuff like this.  They lost a lot of credit with me when they cut the remote access off two years early on my last truck.. If they can do that crap I wouldn't be surprised if they cut off our warranty's .

I am a believer that onstar's time has past, we already all have the same services with our smart phones..why pay double?

I used the remote start app 1 time during trial so its definitely not worth $15.00 a month for me

HOLLYWOOD

slj2008 Senior Enthusiast

slj2008

Posted
Posted

2019LD Silverado - remote start - new battery - still work like S--t . truck is park 60ft away , problems starting ?  Does any one know  if there a software update ???  My 2015 had better range .  Both KEY Fob's have New Battery's .

Bob2C Enthusiast

Bob2C

Posted
Posted
2019LD Silverado - remote start - new battery - still work like S--t . truck is park 60ft away , problems starting ?  Does any one know  if there a software update ???  My 2015 had better range .  Both KEY Fob's have New Battery's .

I am not sure about pickups but I can assume they have the same module. I replaced the amplifier on my Tahoe and the range is great. I was having issues and also key not present showing. Others in the suv world have had same issues and replaced. The part was 15 bucks from rockauto and 20 min of my time. They make 2 different ones with different frequencies.

9b8c05ff5424d21f1da2b467f492aee5.jpg
47f8da24a81af65c60785db42db7e39f.jpg
75f62df891243f8e939ec725fecd4cd2.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Bob2C Enthusiast

Bob2C

Posted
Posted
Thank You - Were is it mounted ??  Thanks

I’m not sure on the pickups but I’m guessing the back window possibly. Mine was located on the passenger rear window.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...