Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am hoping I can get some input with selecting the best gear ratio regarding my current set up:

 

2015 Silverado 1500 High Country 6.2L with 8L90

BDS 4" Coil Over Lift

33 X 12.5 R20 Nitto Ridge Grapplers 

20X10 -18mm Fuel Contra D616 

Wheel and Tire package is 75 lbs. heavier than stock

 

We are upgrading our travel trailer which will run about 8,000 lbs. gross.  We tow maybe a dozen times a year and half of it is over two mountain passes in the Cascades.  And we do get plenty of days in the summer that are over 100 degrees.  As a result, I will be upgrading to a NHT radiator with a 180 degree thermostat and will be reprogramming the fans.  Air bags are being installed with the lift and gear package but I am debating between re-gearing to 3.73 or 4.10 as the 8L90 comes with a 7.0 overall and a 4.56 first gear ratio while the tires are only 1" higher and wheel are 75 lbs. heavier.  Thoughts?

 

Posted

I'm also curious. Subbed.

 

Great username OP!

 

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Posted

I'm also curious. Subbed.

Great username OP

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

Posted

If you have 3.23's from the factory I'd go with 3.73's.

 

4.10's would be okay too but that just more aggressive.

Posted

Creed, although I live in SC now, I was born in Wenatchee and spent a lot of time there after my parents retired from the farm to live there, so I'm well familiar with the area. Whatever gear change you go with, you're going to really enjoy the difference, even driving empty. Unless you're just driving north to Chelan, you have significant grades in all the other directions, Stevens Pass to the west, Pine Canyon to the east and that short grade on Trinidad hill to the south. I try and keep up with the local news there by perusing the KPQ and Wenatchee World websites. BTW, welcome to the forum!

Posted
2 hours ago, m3n00b said:

I'm also curious. Subbed.

Great username OP

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
 

 

Thanks man, appreciate that!

 

39 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

If you have 3.23's from the factory I'd go with 3.73's.

 

4.10's would be okay too but that just more aggressive.

 

Yes, I have the 3.23's since the 3.42's were only available in the NHT package which wasn't offered on the HC.  I am leaning towards 3.73's and I like the idea that I could get factory AAM gears rather than needing a spacer kit to fit the 4.10's in the 9.76" axle. 

 

Curious to see if anyone has a similar set up and are more than pleased with the 3.73's or wished they would have stepped up to the 4.10's.

Posted
30 minutes ago, garagerog said:

Creed, although I live in SC now, I was born in Wenatchee and spent a lot of time there after my parents retired from the farm to live there, so I'm well familiar with the area. Whatever gear change you go with, you're going to really enjoy the difference, even driving empty. Unless you're just driving north to Chelan, you have significant grades in all the other directions, Stevens Pass to the west, Pine Canyon to the east and that short grade on Trinidad hill to the south. I try and keep up with the local news there by perusing the KPQ and Wenatchee World websites. BTW, welcome to the forum!

Garagerog, small world! You know the area well.  Most of the time we are headed over Blewett, Snoqualmie, and Stevens pass.  Appreciate the input and welcome!

  • Like 1
Posted

Do it once go 4:10. I have a 2500 and had the 4:10 rpm was around 1700. I know have 4:88 and love it, rpms at 60 are around 2000.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Do it once go 4:10. I have a 2500 and had the 4:10 rpm was around 1700. I know have 4:88 and love it, rpms at 60 are around 2000.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted

The 8 speed auto helps his cause with 3.73's.

 

It would be like going to 4.10's on a 6L80/90e.

  • Like 1
Posted

4.10 has my vote. Best RPM range on the highway!

 

@ 70 MPH

 

6th gear = 2900 RPM

7th gear = 2500 RPM

8th gear = 1900 RPM

Posted
4.10 has my vote. Best RPM range on the highway!
 
@ 70 MPH
 
6th gear = 2900 RPM
7th gear = 2500 RPM
8th gear = 1900 RPM
With that, all the more reason to go lower. Wish i had the new 10spd

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted

I say 4.10.
I tow a TT that weighs about 6000 with a 5.3 3.42.
That ratio will probably keep your trans from dropping down too many gears on the grades.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Posted

I have 3.23 also but I am leaning towards 4:10s I think its the better choice with the size of the truck and the weight you would carrying.

Posted (edited)

3.73 for sure if you must change them

 

8 speed with 4.10’s is absurd, unlikely you will see any performance benefit whatsoever.

 

and 3.73’s they made oem, 4.10’s you have to go aftermarket

 

IMO people put way to much importance on this in this day in age.

 

For nearly a century when you had 2-4 gears, it was indeed very important. Mild importance with 6 speeds. Now with 8 and 10speeds, it doesn’t matter much.

 

i think people forget the entire point of the rear end ratio is to place the ideal ratio of the number of times the engine spins to the number of times the tires spin. It’s a lot easier to do that when you have 8-10 gear ratio’s to choose from.

 

 

Edited by truckguy82

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...